Hearthpwn

any aggro deck is boring. and any control deck is awesome because thinking is fun and challenging. thank you. bow.

Quote from BerserkMidget08 »

Must agree with the comments about Warrior - it's my least played class by a mile.
Not sure how Hunter is top - Control, Midrange and Aggro are all viable and the Traps are all strong and can be interchanged to mix things up.

How is Hunter top? Proly 'cause it's a poll about the most boring class, not which has the most playstyles/deck types.

Warrior being 1-D could be said for many classes. Warrior has many more options than some other classes. Paladin does same thing every game: play minions, play minions, play minions. No matter which version of Paladin you face, you know they will be flooding the board with minions, its all they can do. Doesn't matter if aggro, mid or control, Paladin plays minions. Hunter: go face, go face, go face, no matter which version, you go face. Rogue: draw, draw, draw, combo. Druid: sticky minions til SR lethal.

Most classes have a pretty defined playstyle. Which class is the most boring is the question, not who has the most different deck types. I'd agree with Hunter being it. They have the least choices to make, and they have little effect. Not saying aggro/hunter is brainless, it does require some skill, albeit a very small amount, just that Warrior/control classes you have to make so many more choices. Having choices kills boredom. Also the choices are tougher, and pretty much every turn in a control match up is extremely important, and you have to make tough decisions more often, and the consequences of a mistake are much harsher. Makes it thrilling. Going down to the wire.

Who wants to pay to see a 1 round boxing match? NO ONE EVER. Every one wants it to go the full 15 rounds. See how people react when they are at the end of their rope, when their goose is cooked, and they got nothing left but will. That's exciting. No one wants to see a 1 round knockout, nothing could be more boring. And that's kind of what Hunter is: the one round knockout, depends on if he gets the luck to mess you up in the first round. Skill/will of players doesn't matter, luck of the first punch(first draw/mulligan) decides most of the match. Nothing could be more boring.

Someone mentioned changing the Hunter Hero Power to "Gain 2 Attack this turn." This would be amazing. Now Hunter has to get through TAUNTs to do damage, and they would have to take damage to trade with their new Hero Power. The amount of thinking required would be through the roof compared to current Hunter. And that would be great. Would make Hunter such a fun, and non-boring class. Choices would have to be made. And many more mistakes would be made, because it would be harder to play, making it more fun and less boring in the process.

Quote from Sisuwolf »

Quote from BerserkMidget08 »

Must agree with the comments about Warrior - it's my least played class by a mile.
Not sure how Hunter is top - Control, Midrange and Aggro are all viable and the Traps are all strong and can be interchanged to mix things up.

How is Hunter top? Proly 'cause it's a poll about the most boring class, not which has the most playstyles/deck types.

Warrior being 1-D could be said for many classes. Warrior has many more options than some other classes. Paladin does same thing every game: play minions, play minions, play minions. No matter which version of Paladin you face, you know they will be flooding the board with minions, its all they can do. Doesn't matter if aggro, mid or control, Paladin plays minions. Hunter: go face, go face, go face, no matter which version, you go face. Rogue: draw, draw, draw, combo. Druid: sticky minions til SR lethal.

Most classes have a pretty defined playstyle. Which class is the most boring is the question, not who has the most different deck types. I'd agree with Hunter being it. They have the least choices to make, and they have little effect. Not saying aggro/hunter is brainless, it does require some skill, albeit a very small amount, just that Warrior/control classes you have to make so many more choices. Having choices kills boredom. Also the choices are tougher, and pretty much every turn in a control match up is extremely important, and you have to make tough decisions more often, and the consequences of a mistake are much harsher. Makes it thrilling. Going down to the wire.

Who wants to pay to see a 1 round boxing match? NO ONE EVER. Every one wants it to go the full 15 rounds. See how people react when they are at the end of their rope, when their goose is cooked, and they got nothing left but will. That's exciting. No one wants to see a 1 round knockout, nothing could be more boring. And that's kind of what Hunter is: the one round knockout, depends on if he gets the luck to mess you up in the first round. Skill/will of players doesn't matter, luck of the first punch(first draw/mulligan) decides most of the match. Nothing could be more boring.

I despise everything about Hunter. I hate playing it, I hate facing it. I just outright hate it. I've tried in the past to make a Hunter deck that I actually enjoy but nothing about it clicks with me, not only that but I seriously just cannot recall a single game I've played against a Hunter that was fun in any way shape or form. I'm a little bit biased right now because of the abundance of Face Hunters but I have the same hatred for Mech Mage and I still have fun playing that class.

I also really dislike Rogue but not for any good reason, the playstyle of Rogue has just never appealed to me. I think the only time I've played Rogue was when TotalBiscuit showed off his Spellpower Rogue gimmick deck, I had some good fun with that for a couple of days. 

In terms of enjoyment for me it'd probably have to go Priest > Paladin > Shaman > Druid > Warlock > Mage > Warrior > Rogue > Hunter.

id have to agree druid is pretty boring. every variation of their decks use the same core cards and they only have 2 win conditions, grind people down, or burst with FoN/SR. and everyone knows what losing to wombo combo is like

BLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

my real complaint is that Malfurion doesnt get FoN SR as an ult in HotS kappa

I think Warrior is the most boring because there is not enough deck archetypes to play.  Druid is also very boring because they use roughly the same decks since the beginning of Hearthstone.

I don’t like playing face or aggro Hunter, but I still have fun with this class because of feign death control decks and all of the fun shot cards in arena.

Shaman is my favorite class, but I think oil rogue, freeze mage, and demonlock are probably the most interesting and fun decks to play right now.

Definitely Zzzzzzarrosh the Zzzzzzarrior.

priest is very boring and near impossible to come up with alternative play styles ATM

Druid is very bland and boring. very standard cards that are just chunky and efficient. there are no exciting cards or even good card design. Even the BORDER is brown. So very bland. 

Note: I do play druid but it is with reluctance and only for quests.

Quote from Redoing »

 

I also found Overload and all the RNG to be frustrating

I find shaman very unique but not very appealing atm as it doesn't feel fully fleshed out yet. Overload was the only unique class icon that had a positive/negative impact which I think turned off a good amount of people but with Lava Shock I think the developers are really starting to fully flesh out Shaman as a full. Hopefully we see more similar to Lava Shock