Hearthpwn

Quote from agon_EU >>

Actually I'm ok with them playing tier1 decks in casual cause I use casual to test my decks before going into ladder. Conceded 3 times in a row last time cause I encoutered 3 paladins and who the fuck plays paladins on ladder, I needed to test my control warrior against the aggro shit out there.

Quote from Ogobum >>

So now we have Reno and if aggro can't win by T5, it's over.  What oh what is an aggro player to do?

1. Call it quits, go play a different game.

2. Win by turn 5 with a hyper-aggro deck.

Reno and his buddy Kazakus are the cause of the pirates. 

Quote from Dxiled >>

Quote from agon_EU >>

Actually I'm ok with them playing tier1 decks in casual cause I use casual to test my decks before going into ladder. Conceded 3 times in a row last time cause I encoutered 3 paladins and who the fuck plays paladins on ladder, I needed to test my control warrior against the aggro shit out there.

 I'm offended. I play Paladin on ladder.

Quote from Falbrogna >>

Quote from Ogobum >>

So now we have Reno and if aggro can't win by T5, it's over.  What oh what is an aggro player to do?

1. Call it quits, go play a different game.

2. Win by turn 5 with a hyper-aggro deck.

Reno and his buddy Kazakus are the cause of the pirates. 

 Thanks, I actually needed the good laugh.

"Hey guys If the only deck who can consistently counter them disappears I'm sure everyone will stop playing this super-fast super-easy super-effective deck that seals wins by turn 5 and nets lots of gold/hour!!!11
Damn you Reno this is all your fault forcing people to play Pirate!"

HIlarious.

Quote from Ogobum >>

Quote from Falbrogna >>

Quote from Ogobum >>

So now we have Reno and if aggro can't win by T5, it's over.  What oh what is an aggro player to do?

1. Call it quits, go play a different game.

2. Win by turn 5 with a hyper-aggro deck.

Reno and his buddy Kazakus are the cause of the pirates. 

 Thanks, I actually needed the good laugh.

"Hey guys If the only deck who can consistently counter them disappears I'm sure everyone will stop playing this super-fast super-easy super-effective deck that seals wins by turn 5 and nets lots of gold/hour!!!11
Damn you Reno this is all your fault forcing people to play Pirate!"

HIlarious.

 So my bad for not explaining:

Reno can stand up to pirates half the time.
Midrange can stand up to pirates half the time.
Reno does well against midrange.

Remove Reno and what decks make a comeback and what deck joins Huntertaker and Patron Warrior in the afterlife?  Sad thing is Rogue dies too.

Quote from Ogobum >>

Quote from Falbrogna >>

Quote from Ogobum >>

So now we have Reno and if aggro can't win by T5, it's over.  What oh what is an aggro player to do?

1. Call it quits, go play a different game.

2. Win by turn 5 with a hyper-aggro deck.

Reno and his buddy Kazakus are the cause of the pirates. 

 Thanks, I actually needed the good laugh.

"Hey guys If the only deck who can consistently counter them disappears I'm sure everyone will stop playing this super-fast super-easy super-effective deck that seals wins by turn 5 and nets lots of gold/hour!!!11
Damn you Reno this is all your fault forcing people to play Pirate!"

HIlarious.

 So my bad for not explaining:

Reno can stand up to pirates half the time.
Midrange can stand up to pirates half the time.
Reno does well against midrange.

Remove Reno and what decks make a comeback and what deck joins Huntertaker and Patron Warrior in the afterlife?  Sad thing is Rogue dies too.

A lot of people are complaining about netdecking but the truth is that it's easier to counter ladder meta when everyone is doing it. It's easier to use some tech cards as well.

It's not players fault that there is no space for creative decks in current meta.

Quote from agon_EU >>

Actually I'm ok with them playing tier1 decks in casual cause I use casual to test my decks before going into ladder. Conceded 3 times in a row last time cause I encoutered 3 paladins and who the fuck plays paladins on ladder, I needed to test my control warrior against the aggro shit out there.

Quote from tictactucroc >>

Quote from Killzun >>

Quote from agon_EU >>

Actually I'm ok with them playing tier1 decks in casual cause I use casual to test my decks before going into ladder. Conceded 3 times in a row last time cause I encoutered 3 paladins and who the fuck plays paladins on ladder, I needed to test my control warrior against the aggro shit out there.

 Nothing but Buff Patardins and Buff Huntards in casual, beside your normal morons that play tier 1 aggro decks in casual because they need a morale boost and have to advance that casual rank, rofl.

 Wait so i'm a retard if I play paladin, i'm a retard if I play hunter, and i'm a moron if I play tier 1 decks that is if I play warrior, shaman, or rogue. I guess i'm also a retard if I play Reno decks.

What deck do YOU play that doesn't make you a retard ? I'm curious

Quote from tictactucroc >>

Quote from PanTomaszHS >>

A lot of people are complaining about netdecking but the truth is that it's easier to counter ladder meta when everyone is doing it. It's easier to use some tech cards as well.

It's not players fault that there is no space for creative decks in current meta.

 I have never netdecked, never played T1 decks (unless I randomly created one without knowing) never had any trouble grinding ladder.

I wish idiots would stop claiming there is no space for fun and creative decks, just because them idiots can't build said decks.

It's definitely players fault that nobody plays fun decks because everyone claims fun decks are unplayable for literally no reason, because some idiot tried the most shitty, greedy, unsynergistic deck ever and got hard countered by a meta deck.

Quote from PanTomaszHS >>

 So i guess Savjz is an idiot too because he claimed that in order to create succesful fun deck you need to move to wild. Of course, you can create fun deck and try to play it if you like to be crushed be aggro patches or reno decks. Good luck and have fun.

I spended like 2 weeks trying to make hunter viable on ladder and didnt give a fuck about my winratio so i am a wrong target for these types of comments. I see a huge difference between space for creativity around GvG/Naxx and current state of a game. And i can fully understand if people are pissed losing to nonsense pirate decks and trying to netdeck counters.

Meta was never so punishing for creating fun decks except maybe huntertaker/secret paladin meta. Is it players fault? No, it's blizzards fault for creating too much space for oppressive decks. Slow down the meta and you will see more creativity because i think that most players don't like to play pirate warrior or aggro shaman but they like to win a lot as well.

Quote from TheWamts >>

Quote from PanTomaszHS >>

 So i guess Savjz is an idiot too because he claimed that in order to create succesful fun deck you need to move to wild. Of course, you can create fun deck and try to play it if you like to be crushed be aggro patches or reno decks. Good luck and have fun.

 m8, you have no idea how to have fun if you can't have fun without a 99% winrate.

Reminder that this is STILL an issue.  We desperately need a "doesn't count for anything" mode. 

edit: Ok this is getting really annoying.  I've been playing casual all afternoon and at least 80% of my matches are against netdeck ladder decks from tier 1 and 2.