Here we go passive aggressive idiots attacking me over an opinion
Why don't you go fuck yourself
Party fiend is different than flame imp and forces different interactions you either have to trade into them 1 at a time, leaving 2 more on board which is a lot different than flame imp
Public Mod Note
(xskarma):
Post Was Warned for Flaming
I hope they nerf maybe one or two Painlock cards, but certainly not all of them. I think increasing the mana on Imprisoned Horror, or decreasing stats on Infernal would be reasonable, though changing stats on infernal would make it inconsistent with other infernals. I’ve also never seen Vona be useful. She’s pretty slow and Painlock as normally either won or lost by the time she would get played in my experience.
Here we go passive aggressive idiots attacking me over an opinion
Why don't you go fuck yourself
Party fiend is different than flame imp and forces different interactions you either have to trade into them 1 at a time, leaving 2 more on board which is a lot different than flame imp
You do realize what they were saying is that your proposed change of Party Fiend would make it the same as Flame Imp but with -2 attack, right?
Maybe read and comprehend the other poster’s argument before calling them names and cursing them out. Especially when your opinion is a heavy handed over-nerf of an entire deck.
Painlock is fine. Aggro destroys it. Control suffers. Someone just loses a few times probably playing pirate demon Hunter and feels silly because 8/10 they should be winning.
Painlock is fine. Aggro destroys it. Control suffers. Someone just loses a few times probably playing pirate demon Hunter and feels silly because 8/10 they should be winning.
Here we go passive aggressive idiots attacking me over an opinion
Why don't you go fuck yourself
Party fiend is different than flame imp and forces different interactions you either have to trade into them 1 at a time, leaving 2 more on board which is a lot different than flame imp
You do realize what they were saying is that your proposed change of Party Fiend would make it the same as Flame Imp but with -2 attack, right?
Maybe read and comprehend the other poster’s argument before calling them names and cursing them out. Especially when your opinion is a heavy handed over-nerf of an entire deck.
You get some reading comprehension instead of being absolutely wrong, it doesn't matter if it's the same its a 1 drop that does what the deck wants dealing damage to yourself, get a brain
Hopefully you learn to read HS replay properly and not just someone’s random deck. I’m currently 26-2 in wild with Pure Paladin today. Beat some top tier decks along the way. Just get better.
Here are some changes I believe should be made so Painlock isn't (O)verly(P)ainfulock
Mass Production 1 mana --> 2 mana
Party Fiend 1/1 --> 1/2, No longer summons Felbeast
Cursed Souvenir +3/3 --> +2/2
Malefic Rook 5/6 --> 4/6
Pop'gar the Putrid 4 mana --> 5 mana
Fearless Flamejuggler 2 mana --> 3 mana
INFERNAL! 6/6 --> 4/6
Blood Treant Cannot be played on your first turn
Trolley Problem 3 mana --> 4 mana
Imprisoned Horror 9 mana --> 12 mana
Party Planner Vona 6 mana --> 7 mana
why don't you just suggest banning warlock all-together?
edit:
Party Fiend 1/1 --> 1/2, No longer summons Felbeast
you do realise that there';s Flame Imp since Hearthstone's inception, right?
Here we go passive aggressive idiots attacking me over an opinion
Why don't you go fuck yourself
Party fiend is different than flame imp and forces different interactions you either have to trade into them 1 at a time, leaving 2 more on board which is a lot different than flame imp
I hope they nerf maybe one or two Painlock cards, but certainly not all of them. I think increasing the mana on Imprisoned Horror, or decreasing stats on Infernal would be reasonable, though changing stats on infernal would make it inconsistent with other infernals.
I’ve also never seen Vona be useful. She’s pretty slow and Painlock as normally either won or lost by the time she would get played in my experience.
Decks are allowed to be good mate. Maybe you should play something good too or get better. It’s very beatable and probably not even top tier.
Totally agree with Painlock not being top tier. Mmmm Paladin (my main class), Druid and Warrior are the current powerhouses at least in Asia server.
You do realize what they were saying is that your proposed change of Party Fiend would make it the same as Flame Imp but with -2 attack, right?
Maybe read and comprehend the other poster’s argument before calling them names and cursing them out. Especially when your opinion is a heavy handed over-nerf of an entire deck.
Painlock is fine. Aggro destroys it. Control suffers. Someone just loses a few times probably playing pirate demon Hunter and feels silly because 8/10 they should be winning.
I thought Blizzard was bad at balancing things. But you are definitely worse.
And telling someone to go fuck themselves because they point out an obvious and basic flaw in your suggestions, is very dumb.
No its a tier 1 deck
They didn't point out shit there was no flaw in anything I Said, You are worse at everything in life
You get some reading comprehension instead of being absolutely wrong, it doesn't matter if it's the same its a 1 drop that does what the deck wants dealing damage to yourself, get a brain
It quite obviously is a top tier deck which statistic will show. 62% winrate.
No shit, its not just good its broken
Hopefully you learn to read HS replay properly and not just someone’s random deck. I’m currently 26-2 in wild with Pure Paladin today. Beat some top tier decks along the way. Just get better.
Since this thread just devolved into OP name calling others instead of having any kind of constructive discussion, we are closing this here.
CLOSED.
If you see a bad post on the forum use the report function under it, so I or someone else of the moderation team can take care of it!