FIVE combats in a row of him getting the first attack (him leading with mcaw, me leading with Zap). Five. Not one single combat do I get the first attack, and it’s 100% a win for me if I do as I won once, tied three times, and lost the last one and got knocked out.
Both of us at lethal damage on a loss. Like why in the hell is it not designed to just alternate back and forth for first attack when at top two.
And I agree to an extent, auto chess in general is super high RNG. However, when you get the outlier matches like that it feels awful, especially when it was a win to go first. I do feel your pain.
And I agree to an extent, auto chess in general is super high RNG. However, when you get the outlier matches like that it feels awful, especially when it was a win to go first. I do feel your pain.
Trust me I generally don’t get mad at the RNG as I fully know what I’m getting into with any auto battler.
But to lose a 50/50, FIVE combats in a row, where winning even a single win is a tavern win, is beyond tilting.
And I agree to an extent, auto chess in general is super high RNG. However, when you get the outlier matches like that it feels awful, especially when it was a win to go first. I do feel your pain.
Trust me I generally don’t get mad at the RNG as I fully know what I’m getting into with any auto battler.
But to lose a 50/50, FIVE combats in a row, where winning even a single win is a tavern win, is beyond tilting.
Sometimes the game is rigged from the start. (yep it's true, they even have an algorithm for that.) Some players have a "small" advantage some don't. Learn how the game is generating goldens and copies. If they never appear it could be the game won't want you to win. In that case, just have fun. Nothing to do.
The chance of losing 5 coinflips in a row is 3%. Is it that low? I mean, I had less than 0,1% loss in a battle once, pretty sure you had decent amount of 1-2% losses and was not as tilted. Your suggestion is fair, but maybe they want players to think in such situations (from your opponent perspective): "I'm screwed, but if I attack first 5 times in a row I have a chance" rather than "even if I win coinflip once I would still lose".
Sometimes the game is rigged from the start. (yep it's true, they even have an algorithm for that.) Some players have a "small" advantage some don't. Learn how the game is generating goldens and copies. If they never appear it could be the game won't want you to win. In that case, just have fun. Nothing to do.
The game don't want anyone to win or lose, otherwise stats would show it. Not a single person claiming that the game is rigged has yet been able to bring such stats, and it's not like people are not trying, they've even figured out the existence of a pity timer, which is much less important. It's just your obsession with conspiracy theories.
Me and the last guy. Me demons, him beasts.
FIVE combats in a row of him getting the first attack (him leading with mcaw, me leading with Zap). Five. Not one single combat do I get the first attack, and it’s 100% a win for me if I do as I won once, tied three times, and lost the last one and got knocked out.
Both of us at lethal damage on a loss. Like why in the hell is it not designed to just alternate back and forth for first attack when at top two.
/rant
The combat is decided before the first attack begins. You just watch the animations being played.
Op knows this. Clearly you didn't read the post.
And I agree to an extent, auto chess in general is super high RNG. However, when you get the outlier matches like that it feels awful, especially when it was a win to go first. I do feel your pain.
Trust me I generally don’t get mad at the RNG as I fully know what I’m getting into with any auto battler.
But to lose a 50/50, FIVE combats in a row, where winning even a single win is a tavern win, is beyond tilting.
Sometimes the game is rigged from the start. (yep it's true, they even have an algorithm for that.)
Some players have a "small" advantage some don't. Learn how the game is generating goldens and copies. If they never appear it could be the game won't want you to win. In that case, just have fun. Nothing to do.
The chance of losing 5 coinflips in a row is 3%. Is it that low? I mean, I had less than 0,1% loss in a battle once, pretty sure you had decent amount of 1-2% losses and was not as tilted. Your suggestion is fair, but maybe they want players to think in such situations (from your opponent perspective): "I'm screwed, but if I attack first 5 times in a row I have a chance" rather than "even if I win coinflip once I would still lose".
The game don't want anyone to win or lose, otherwise stats would show it. Not a single person claiming that the game is rigged has yet been able to bring such stats, and it's not like people are not trying, they've even figured out the existence of a pity timer, which is much less important. It's just your obsession with conspiracy theories.
English is not my native language, so, with a high probability, mistakes were made.
This could have gone in the group therapy thread and did not need it's own thread, especially not outside of the Battlegrounds forum.
CLOSED.
If you see a bad post on the forum use the report function under it, so I or someone else of the moderation team can take care of it!