I don't understand why op wants to nerf these classes.
Face Hunter is pretty easily countered by healing and armor gain and can be beaten frequently even without those.
Shaman has had a second to be good and also is pretty countable. I personally don't like playing against shaman but that doesn't mean it needs to be nerfed.
Demon hunter has a pretty cool deck that can be incredibly strong but is often inconsistent.
Some decks have to be tier 1 and these are pretty reasonable tier 1 decks. Now, there might be a problem if these are the only decks being played in a couple of weeks. But there hasn't been enough time to find that out.
Perpetual Flame is fine. The main reason nobody puts it in their decks is the fact that it is a Fire spell. Right now Shamans only main deck Nature Spells for the synergy with Primal Dungeoneer. Making Perpetual Flame 0 mana would somewhat make it worse because it could no longer be generated by Wandmaker.
I like how people here are anti-stats, while people in the other threads, especially the thread made by a guy who reached Legend with Control Warrior, talk greatly about stats.
It's as if there are two completely different and opposite circles in one community.
Either that or you are just pretentious hypocrites.
A lot of my suggestions, while just an opinion, are based on stats. Mankrik and Warsong Wrangler specifically.
Admittedly, I didn't look very sharply at the stats before suggesting the other three nerfs, but for Lilypad Lurker, I chose that because it was unnecessarily buffed.
I'm going to revise my list here and change the cards need to be nerfed:
Skull of Gul'dan to either Deathspeaker Blackthorn or Illidari Inquisitor, more on the latter. The latter can have a ridiculous win rate of 75% if played.
Next time, before calling someone "sore loser because you lose a match", actually back your arguments.
This very much seems like a kneejerk reaction. Face hunter is always particularly good when new cards get played because it punishes pretty much most jank decks. I'd wait at least a week or two after the miniset is out to judge how good or otherwise decks and classes are and then, if there's any need, nerf or buff. As is, I wouldn't agree with any of the buffs/nerfs OP suggested as I see no need or real justification for any of them. Maybe in another week, if somehow face hunter is the best unquestionably dominating deck on ladder, there can be consideration for nerfing it but as is...nah.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I don't understand why op wants to nerf these classes.
Face Hunter is pretty easily countered by healing and armor gain and can be beaten frequently even without those.
Shaman has had a second to be good and also is pretty countable. I personally don't like playing against shaman but that doesn't mean it needs to be nerfed.
Demon hunter has a pretty cool deck that can be incredibly strong but is often inconsistent.
Some decks have to be tier 1 and these are pretty reasonable tier 1 decks. Now, there might be a problem if these are the only decks being played in a couple of weeks. But there hasn't been enough time to find that out.
Perpetual Flame is fine. The main reason nobody puts it in their decks is the fact that it is a Fire spell. Right now Shamans only main deck Nature Spells for the synergy with Primal Dungeoneer. Making Perpetual Flame 0 mana would somewhat make it worse because it could no longer be generated by Wandmaker.
Imagine being this dense
This very much seems like a kneejerk reaction. Face hunter is always particularly good when new cards get played because it punishes pretty much most jank decks. I'd wait at least a week or two after the miniset is out to judge how good or otherwise decks and classes are and then, if there's any need, nerf or buff. As is, I wouldn't agree with any of the buffs/nerfs OP suggested as I see no need or real justification for any of them. Maybe in another week, if somehow face hunter is the best unquestionably dominating deck on ladder, there can be consideration for nerfing it but as is...nah.