Hearthpwn

Quote from JoeByeDon >>

Quote from RomanKnight >>

If shaman becomes a problem, people will just start running ooze and shaman is gone. 

 If you think running an ooze is going to stop that deck, then I have a bridge to sell you.

 Maybe not stop but lower its wr 100% sure

Quote from HatShapedHat >>

Quote from EvilZero >>

Standard is just aggro again. 

 It always will be.  People really gotta start accepting it because as long as the game is popular on mobile the majority of people will flock to aggressive decks because they make for quicker matches.

I exclusively play aggro or mid-range decks when I'm on phone because if I'm on my phone, it means I have less time to play games

 Aggro is one of the factors why this game has become unfun for so many people. I'm not saying "LOL dead game", but when aggro is always, ALWAYS the top deck, it is not nearly as fun as it could be. Hearthstone has so many interesting cards and effects, but aggro runs over the majority of it. They introduced the most aggro of the aggro with demon hunter. 

Quote from xanzan1 >>

I would be surprised if Shaman doesn't get a nerf. Rockbiter weapon has a 71.2% played winrate.  They've nerfed cards at a lower played winrate than that.

 Lol what? This feels relevant here.

Quote from EvilZero >>

 

Quote from HatShapedHat >>

Quote from EvilZero >>

Standard is just aggro again. 

 It always will be.  People really gotta start accepting it because as long as the game is popular on mobile the majority of people will flock to aggressive decks because they make for quicker matches.

I exclusively play aggro or mid-range decks when I'm on phone because if I'm on my phone, it means I have less time to play games

 Aggro is one of the factors why this game has become unfun for so many people. I'm not saying "LOL dead game", but when aggro is always, ALWAYS the top deck, it is not nearly as fun as it could be. Hearthstone has so many interesting cards and effects, but aggro runs over the majority of it. They introduced the most aggro of the aggro with demon hunter. 

 Literally up to a week ago, the best deck in the game was Secret Libram Paladin. A midrange deck. If DH is the "most aggro of aggro", then why is the currently best performing and most played DH list also a midrange deck? Or have aggro and midrange suddenly become the same?

how is this fun? ppl are saying that there is a new deck "elemental" shaman or "deathrattle" dh,all i see is another face hunter,shamans doesnt do shit all they do is equip doomhammer go face finish with alex or alakir.Face hunter = doomhammer shaman = ilidari demon hunter

OMG imagine having to actually hit face eventually in order to finish off an opponent and win a match....what a concept!

The meta is either super greedy or super aggressive, and it's pretty much gotten worse over the last year.

I thought the core set would fix that but it's really only made it worse. It's just made a lot of these aggro decks had way more longevity and the ability to play into the midgame.

Like the tension versus a heavy aggro or face deck used to be... could I outlast it, could I keep their threats off the board. Now, that no longer works because a lot of these decks just have SO much burst from hand. Playing for board is just entirely pointless almost, even more so than it used to be.

I'm glad people are having fun with this meta, but I'm really not personally. It just frustrates me.