if that true then its was not a failure.... then did not overnerf means there did it perf... a nerf should not remove the deck from game its should lower the win rate so its the same as the next best
In Wild not but in Standard maybe the Refreshing was buffed instead nerfed because now you can corrupt and play ring toss in the same turn, before you can't do that.
In Wild not but in Standard maybe the Refreshing was buffed instead nerfed because now you can corrupt and play ring toss in the same turn, before you can't do that.
I noticed the same thing during my gameplay, it's a bonus.
In Wild not but in Standard maybe the Refreshing was buffed instead nerfed because now you can corrupt and play ring toss in the same turn, before you can't do that.
In wild it changed a little bit. I see more control. Like Rez Priest made a comeback.
It seems to me like every meta is "the most hated meta in history". Yet people keep playing by the MILLIONS, suck it up and quit crying, adjust your deck or your game to something different if you can't win. Presumably, that's why you hate it. I've nearly made it to legend at one point or another with every class in the game. They've all had their chance to shine and your deck doesn't have to be tier1 on tempostorm, or the highest winrate deck according to hsreplay in order to win. Those are the decks you can win the EASIEST with, not the only decks that can win.
I've just been playing Duels. But, it would seem like Paly took a bit of a hit with the nerfs, no? Warlock gotta be a bit worse with the Hysteria nerf.
I'm not saying that the buffs did much, but I would think toning down Paladin a bit would have a pretty big effect on the meta.
I disagree, most hated meta was Huntertaker and Shamanstone, they were never so responsive patching and nerfing cards that time, what I can't forgive is the buffs that were completely nonsense, I expected caravan buffs not that weird cards
I don't think this meta is that bad. Not that great either. Just kind of meh. What I do find kind of ironic, however is that this was supposed to be the "minion" meta. And yet we have a bunch of decks that either don't run minions, like mage, or where minions aren't really all that consequential, like warlock. I kind of want to play the rush warrior deck, but I find my opponents just not playing enough minions to rush into.
Meta is fine. Rogue, Priest, Lock, Warr, DH (otk), Pala and Mage are all in tier1 and if u can sniff out what ur opponents play u can rank up easily. Obviously Pala is number uno but not as powerful as Razakus Priest or Call to arms Pala used to be and we tolerated these decks for far longer periods with much less viable decks in tier1.
ofc there is another topic when their fix is a total failure, I just cannot fanthom why people like you even post? like what is the point? to show that you got nothing going on or any cares for anything? lol gtfo
I like balance changes in general and think they need to do some nerfs/buffs more often just to shake meta. But last changes, omg. They waited for so long, they did 3 buffs for shaman and it’s still the same, still unplayable. What’s wrong with these people in Blizzard.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Could it have been more of a failure?
if that true then its was not a failure.... then did not overnerf means there did it perf... a nerf should not remove the deck from game its should lower the win rate so its the same as the next best
Another topic about the same thing.. wow
Det är bättre med en fågel i hand, än tiger i träd!
Blizzard clearly didn't playtest their balance changes.
They didn't play the game, either.
They literally said that they liked this meta, even though this meta is one of the most hated meta in the history of Hearthstone.
In Wild not but in Standard maybe the Refreshing was buffed instead nerfed because now you can corrupt and play ring toss in the same turn, before you can't do that.
An epic fail, just as boomsday "buffs"
I noticed the same thing during my gameplay, it's a bonus.
In wild it changed a little bit. I see more control. Like Rez Priest made a comeback.
lul
It seems to me like every meta is "the most hated meta in history". Yet people keep playing by the MILLIONS, suck it up and quit crying, adjust your deck or your game to something different if you can't win. Presumably, that's why you hate it. I've nearly made it to legend at one point or another with every class in the game. They've all had their chance to shine and your deck doesn't have to be tier1 on tempostorm, or the highest winrate deck according to hsreplay in order to win. Those are the decks you can win the EASIEST with, not the only decks that can win.
I've just been playing Duels. But, it would seem like Paly took a bit of a hit with the nerfs, no? Warlock gotta be a bit worse with the Hysteria nerf.
I'm not saying that the buffs did much, but I would think toning down Paladin a bit would have a pretty big effect on the meta.
Galavant Animation
Care to elaborate?
Care to provide any actual evidence for any of your obnoxious claims?
If you don't enjoy playing the game, then don't. Some of us enjoy it and will continue to play it.
I love that so many people keep playing these decks, as Paladins have become a free win for me.
I hope people don't switch to Priests and Rogues en masse.
More grinding for all of us = nerf success
I disagree, most hated meta was Huntertaker and Shamanstone, they were never so responsive patching and nerfing cards that time, what I can't forgive is the buffs that were completely nonsense, I expected caravan buffs not that weird cards
I don't think this meta is that bad. Not that great either. Just kind of meh. What I do find kind of ironic, however is that this was supposed to be the "minion" meta. And yet we have a bunch of decks that either don't run minions, like mage, or where minions aren't really all that consequential, like warlock. I kind of want to play the rush warrior deck, but I find my opponents just not playing enough minions to rush into.
Meta is fine. Rogue, Priest, Lock, Warr, DH (otk), Pala and Mage are all in tier1 and if u can sniff out what ur opponents play u can rank up easily. Obviously Pala is number uno but not as powerful as Razakus Priest or Call to arms Pala used to be and we tolerated these decks for far longer periods with much less viable decks in tier1.
ofc there is another topic when their fix is a total failure, I just cannot fanthom why people like you even post? like what is the point? to show that you got nothing going on or any cares for anything? lol gtfo
I like balance changes in general and think they need to do some nerfs/buffs more often just to shake meta. But last changes, omg. They waited for so long, they did 3 buffs for shaman and it’s still the same, still unplayable. What’s wrong with these people in Blizzard.