Ok Blizz. I hereby declare I Will not give You any more of my money (and I've spent a lot) on packs, bundles and expansions.
Unless... You implement an option to ban a class from being your opponent. Just a small feature to add. Pick one class and You Will not face it in duels. Life saver and time saver :)
The class ban will never happen, and do you know why? Because the next day after the class ban is implemented, you'll have Zeddy Hearthstone leading his 17k mouth breathers in a crusade to have ten new balance discussions, one for each "class banned" meta.
And funnily enough, they would be right to do so. If such a stupid idea was to be implemented, it would create eleven sub metas (including the one where people don't choose to ban), all of which would have an expectation of balance. Good luck with that.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Helpful Clarification on Forbidden Topics for Hearthstone Forums:
Enjoying Americans winning in the Olympics is forbidden because it is political. A 14 plus page discussion of state-sponsored lawsuits against a multi-national corporation based on harassment, discrimination, and wrongful death allegations is apparently not political enough to raise an issue.
I Will still play the game, I Just wont Pay any more for doing it. No need to "bye" me. I like the game but playing against certain decks almost all the time sucks the fun out of it.
IT is a valid point Shadowrisen, yet again they almost never balance Wild, the option might be a Wild only feature.
To all the priest haters out there: Happy new year!!!
If you can't change the situation change your perspective they say....
so what some people do in wild -including me- is to reach Diamond 5 with a fresh deck we enjoy to climb with and then swich to a priest killer
Maly druid some months ago, now mill rogue, both priest are just rage quit after a long fight, you lose 80% to aggro so you are just not going to hit legend, but you will win ALL priests. So...... the more annoying opponents the more disguisting priest decks i face the More fun i have playing HS.
Hahaha, but frankly, while Mill Rogue indeed gets destroyed by aggro, Maly Druid, at least until a couple of months ago, was a very viable and competitive deck with quite some anti-aggro tools (mainly Spreading Plague and Swipe) and I made legend with it multiple times.
if the option is ever added not sure I'd ban Hunter or.....wait that's the only class that I truly suffer with with the deck I'm currently playing.....
Ok Blizz. I hereby declare I Will not give You any more of my money (and I've spent a lot) on packs, bundles and expansions.
Unless... You implement an option to ban a class from being your opponent. Just a small feature to add. Pick one class and You Will not face it in duels. Life saver and time saver :)
You can buy that mode for $99,- per expansion period.....bargain if you ask me.
Do it in wild and priests will have 11 hour waits.
Yup. Then they'd be crying about not being able to cheat out 8/8's 10/10's for 2 or 3 mana, I'd feast on those tears.
On the bright side they could always drive each other nuts with priest mirrors. then maybe they'd finally see why priest is broken and needs toning down, desperately. Priest is NOT fun to play, and I feel dirty when I have to use the class.
Apparently "mouth breather" has joined the inconsistent lexicon of terms that can draw a warning from moderators on this forum.
I can't keep up anymore. The last two threads I was involved in have at least six pages each in which I am called every name in the book, mostly in posts that don't have a point to them. But I'm sure each one of those posts drew a warning as well. Except not, because they were made by the same two people over and over and over.
Whatevs, sorry to the 12 people who upvoted. You are apparently promoting "flaming".
From now on, I will only speak in Zeddy-level euphemism.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Helpful Clarification on Forbidden Topics for Hearthstone Forums:
Enjoying Americans winning in the Olympics is forbidden because it is political. A 14 plus page discussion of state-sponsored lawsuits against a multi-national corporation based on harassment, discrimination, and wrongful death allegations is apparently not political enough to raise an issue.
Apparently "mouth breather" has joined the inconsistent lexicon of terms that can draw a warning from moderators on this forum.
I can't keep up anymore. The last two threads I was involved in have at least six pages each in which I am called every name in the book, mostly in posts that don't have a point to them. But I'm sure each one of those posts drew a warning as well. Except not, because they were made by the same two people over and over and over.
Whatevs, sorry to the 12 people who upvoted. You are apparently promoting "flaming".
From now on, I will only speak in Zeddy-level euphemism.
Sounds like something a mouth breather would say 🧐
There's actually a really good way to ban all 10 classes at once. If you press Alt + F4 every time you queue up, you never need to face any of the 10 classes ever again.
@shadowrisen: Your frustration with the fanbase is justified imo.
Helpful Clarification on Forbidden Topics for Hearthstone Forums:
Enjoying Americans winning in the Olympics is forbidden because it is political. A 14 plus page discussion of state-sponsored lawsuits against a multi-national corporation based on harassment, discrimination, and wrongful death allegations is apparently not political enough to raise an issue.
Ok Blizz. I hereby declare I Will not give You any more of my money (and I've spent a lot) on packs, bundles and expansions.
Unless... You implement an option to ban a class from being your opponent. Just a small feature to add. Pick one class and You Will not face it in duels. Life saver and time saver :)
😂
i was hoping they develop this feature since the beginning
They might as well just remove priest if they do that.
Do it in wild and priests will have 11 hour waits.
every patch i pray its the removal of the priest class, i guess we'll both still be waiting :)
Twitch.tv/boozyfbaby
Least Favorite Cards of All Time: Jade Idol , Divine Favor , Counterspell , Resurrect ,Mecha'thun , Eternal Servitude ,
Bye
The class ban will never happen, and do you know why? Because the next day after the class ban is implemented, you'll have Zeddy Hearthstone leading his 17k mouth breathers in a crusade to have ten new balance discussions, one for each "class banned" meta.
And funnily enough, they would be right to do so. If such a stupid idea was to be implemented, it would create eleven sub metas (including the one where people don't choose to ban), all of which would have an expectation of balance. Good luck with that.
Helpful Clarification on Forbidden Topics for Hearthstone Forums:
Enjoying Americans winning in the Olympics is forbidden because it is political. A 14 plus page discussion of state-sponsored lawsuits against a multi-national corporation based on harassment, discrimination, and wrongful death allegations is apparently not political enough to raise an issue.
I Will still play the game, I Just wont Pay any more for doing it. No need to "bye" me. I like the game but playing against certain decks almost all the time sucks the fun out of it.
IT is a valid point Shadowrisen, yet again they almost never balance Wild, the option might be a Wild only feature.
I would like this too tbh. Saves me an auto concede.
To all the priest haters out there: Happy new year!!!
If you can't change the situation change your perspective they say....
so what some people do in wild -including me- is to reach Diamond 5 with a fresh deck we enjoy to climb with and then swich to a priest killer
Maly druid some months ago, now mill rogue, both priest are just rage quit after a long fight, you lose 80% to aggro so you are just not going to hit legend, but you will win ALL priests. So...... the more annoying opponents the more disguisting priest decks i face the More fun i have playing HS.
: )
Hahaha, but frankly, while Mill Rogue indeed gets destroyed by aggro, Maly Druid, at least until a couple of months ago, was a very viable and competitive deck with quite some anti-aggro tools (mainly Spreading Plague and Swipe) and I made legend with it multiple times.
I'd like to see this in Duels and in casual. Not on standard or wild ladder, though.
if the option is ever added not sure I'd ban Hunter or.....wait that's the only class that I truly suffer with with the deck I'm currently playing.....
You can buy that mode for $99,- per expansion period.....bargain if you ask me.
Silas Darkmoon
Yup. Then they'd be crying about not being able to cheat out 8/8's 10/10's for 2 or 3 mana, I'd feast on those tears.
On the bright side they could always drive each other nuts with priest mirrors. then maybe they'd finally see why priest is broken and needs toning down, desperately. Priest is NOT fun to play, and I feel dirty when I have to use the class.
Apparently "mouth breather" has joined the inconsistent lexicon of terms that can draw a warning from moderators on this forum.
I can't keep up anymore. The last two threads I was involved in have at least six pages each in which I am called every name in the book, mostly in posts that don't have a point to them. But I'm sure each one of those posts drew a warning as well. Except not, because they were made by the same two people over and over and over.
Whatevs, sorry to the 12 people who upvoted. You are apparently promoting "flaming".
From now on, I will only speak in Zeddy-level euphemism.
Helpful Clarification on Forbidden Topics for Hearthstone Forums:
Enjoying Americans winning in the Olympics is forbidden because it is political. A 14 plus page discussion of state-sponsored lawsuits against a multi-national corporation based on harassment, discrimination, and wrongful death allegations is apparently not political enough to raise an issue.
Sounds like something a mouth breather would say 🧐
There's actually a really good way to ban all 10 classes at once. If you press Alt + F4 every time you queue up, you never need to face any of the 10 classes ever again.
@shadowrisen: Your frustration with the fanbase is justified imo.
Lol, Arcengal.
Always a legit option.
Helpful Clarification on Forbidden Topics for Hearthstone Forums:
Enjoying Americans winning in the Olympics is forbidden because it is political. A 14 plus page discussion of state-sponsored lawsuits against a multi-national corporation based on harassment, discrimination, and wrongful death allegations is apparently not political enough to raise an issue.
I would not mind this feature for casual play. For ladder or duels or Arena this isn't even an option that would be remotely fair.
Grammar is the difference between knowing your crap, and knowing you’re crap.
A .gif is worth a thousand words.