-I will agree that wild is full of them and has been since KoFT, but in Arena I'm just facing DH to the max and I think that Standard should have more DH, Hunter and Rouge. Have you tried running a decktracker or something? Then you will know that's it's not just your hatred that exaggerates the numbers. I can tell since I hate playing against priest as well ;)
I don't use a tracker, but it's not that hard. When I play any mode, I can easily see when I'm facing more Priests than I should, because I instantly end an Arena/Duels Run, or I instantly lose a bunch of stars back to a floor. That is how I lose like 7 or 8 stars in a matter of 10 minutes, I concede to Priests.
-I will agree that wild is full of them and has been since KoFT, but in Arena I'm just facing DH to the max and I think that Standard should have more DH, Hunter and Rouge. Have you tried running a decktracker or something? Then you will know that's it's not just your hatred that exaggerates the numbers. I can tell since I hate playing against priest as well ;)
I don't use a tracker, but it's not that hard. When I play any mode, I can easily see when I'm facing more Priests than I should, because I instantly end an Arena/Duels Run, or I instantly lose a bunch of stars back to a floor. That is how I lose like 7 or 8 stars in a matter of 10 minutes, I concede to Priests.
damn sorry to hear that. I mean it's not exactly an unpopular class, but I suppose it's one of the medium played ones in arena and duels... You should be facing more DH I believe. Maybe team 5 just hate you...
damn sorry to hear that. I mean it's not exactly an unpopular class, but I suppose it's one of the medium played ones in arena and duels... You should be facing more DH I believe. Maybe team 5 just hate you...
Yeah, in theory I would face more DH, I would like that very much, but no, it's a spam of Priests. From what you are saying I should be seeing them in opposite amounts, more DH and less Priest. It is not even close, Demon Hunter are rare compared to Priests.
Whoa Popeye, you just went way off the deep end. I'm out.
And yes, everyone who agrees with me is a Blizzard spy. They have a multi-million dollar network of forum posters. Which, again, doesn't answer my question about which part was wrong.
I used to get packs. Then I wrote the wall of text to end all walls of text. It had the fanciest, most impressive words . . . the best words . . . everyone said so. I mean it had to be at least . . . 5 paragraphs.
Now I get paid by the word, so the wallier the wall, the better.
EDIT: In more serious terms, I think I got a life-changing job today, so that's good.
I don't usually commented, but I got irritated by how yepapep and popeye randomly attack person in the internet just because he elaborate his opinion clearly. If I was the moderator, this is not kind of discussion I wanted and both person should have get banned.
Discussion should stay objective and based on the what point discussed, or what statement brought to the table, not suddenly changed to attacking the person who just gives his opinion on the topic. Only a very low person do that.
Also, surely my paragraph above is out of topic discussion. But I feel the need to pointed this out because this will be unhealthy forum to have. And I want this two people to know that this their harassment (?) to shadowrisen Is actually more hurtful to read than the wall of text shadowrisen has wrote. And I don't like the wall of text either but I still read it and doesn't feel bad about it, at all.
i applaud how you reason out to those who is attacking you and not the argument. when they use "Ad hominem", just don't reply its not educational or entertaining anymore.
I don't usually commented, but I got irritated by how yepapep and popeye randomly attack person in the internet just because he elaborate his opinion clearly. If I was the moderator, this is not kind of discussion I wanted and both person should have get banned.
Discussion should stay objective and based on the what point discussed, or what statement brought to the table, not suddenly changed to attacking the person who just gives his opinion on the topic. Only a very low person do that.
Also, surely my paragraph above is out of topic discussion. But I feel the need to pointed this out because this will be unhealthy forum to have. And I want this two people to know that this their harassment (?) to shadowrisen Is actually more hurtful to read than the wall of text shadowrisen has wrote. And I don't like the wall of text either but I still read it and doesn't feel bad about it, at all.
I don't usually commented, but I got irritated by how yepapep and popeye randomly attack person in the internet just because he elaborate his opinion clearly. If I was the moderator, this is not kind of discussion I wanted and both person should have get banned.
Discussion should stay objective and based on the what point discussed, or what statement brought to the table, not suddenly changed to attacking the person who just gives his opinion on the topic. Only a very low person do that.
Also, surely my paragraph above is out of topic discussion. But I feel the need to pointed this out because this will be unhealthy forum to have. And I want this two people to know that this their harassment (?) to shadowrisen Is actually more hurtful to read than the wall of text shadowrisen has wrote. And I don't like the wall of text either but I still read it and doesn't feel bad about it, at all.
I only got personal when his responses were condescending toward my intelligence, saying I was complaining because I was too stupid to understand his book. Like fr, i’m all for giving ones opinion but Jesus Christ, his opinion literally could’ve been edited down to 5-6 sentences. And when I say something toward that he responds by assuming I just dint have the literacy to understand the information within. Narcissistic at it’s finest and your a snowflake at it’s finest
To ALL of you defending blizzard, are you telling us that the game is truly random, there is no pre-defined matchmaking, there is no gambling strategy behind the game and that whoever is best wins??
There is definitive and published proof that the game is driven by sophisticated blizzard algorithms, not the players or luck, what on earth are you going on about?!?
Blizzard started investing in forums i see .. nice.at least we know they hear us.and that video is 100% real.every time i craft a new legendary .. that legendary gets intk the honeymoon period for at least 5 games(being the card that wins the game).and Random ( as generated by a computer ) does not exist . Machines know algorithms . That s all.
Blizzard started investing in forums i see .. nice.at least we know they hear us.and that video is 100% real.every time i craft a new legendary .. that legendary gets intk the honeymoon period for at least 5 games(being the card that wins the game).and Random ( as generated by a computer ) does not exist . Machines know algorithms . That s all.
That’s exactly my point in the previous post. a) it’s obvious to whoever plays 4-5 games, more importantly b) it’s published evidence, written by blizzard’s lawyers. What other proof do these flat earthers need??
Come on, Yep, accusing someone in discussion to be get paid as a spy is clearly an attack. You doesn't have to be sensitive to know it. And then change the course discussion to attack his method of elaborating? To criticize the wall of text? That so low..
Discussion's spotlight should not be about the motive or the method or who was talking, discussion's spotlight should be the thing that matters. We should respect every opinion and count every facts brought to the table.
How if, that shadowrisen refuse to hear your thoughts about the game because you can't even make a proper paragraph to elaborate. You should not join the the discussion. Doesn't it feels as an attack to you, yep?
But no, he not do that or attack your persona in any other way. He instead elaborate his point again and again and counter your argument. Which is very noble thing to have in discussion. I can't be that patience. That's a patience of real life lawyer for sure.
Come on, Yep, accusing someone in discussion to be get paid as a spy is clearly an attack. You doesn't have to be sensitive to know it. And then change the course discussion to attack his method of elaborating? To criticize the wall of text? That so low..
Discussion's spotlight should not be about the motive or the method or who was talking, discussion's spotlight should be the thing that matters. We should respect every opinion and count every facts brought to the table.
How if, that shadowrisen refuse to hear your thoughts about the game because you can't even make a proper paragraph to elaborate. You should not join the the discussion. Doesn't it feels as an attack to you, yep?
But no, he not do that or attack your persona in any other way. He instead elaborate his point again and again and counter your argument. Which is very noble thing to have in discussion. I can't be that patience. That's a patience of real life lawyer for sure.
Come on, Yep, accusing someone in discussion to be get paid as a spy is clearly an attack. You doesn't have to be sensitive to know it. And then change the course discussion to attack his method of elaborating? To criticize the wall of text? That so low..
Discussion's spotlight should not be about the motive or the method or who was talking, discussion's spotlight should be the thing that matters. We should respect every opinion and count every facts brought to the table.
How if, that shadowrisen refuse to hear your thoughts about the game because you can't even make a proper paragraph to elaborate. You should not join the the discussion. Doesn't it feels as an attack to you, yep?
But no, he not do that or attack your persona in any other way. He instead elaborate his point again and again and counter your argument. Which is very noble thing to have in discussion. I can't be that patience. That's a patience of real life lawyer for sure.
tldr
Thanks for quoting my wall of text for nothing so it can be read twice. And now I quoting your quote so it can be read thrice!
Come on, Yep, accusing someone in discussion to be get paid as a spy is clearly an attack. You doesn't have to be sensitive to know it. And then change the course discussion to attack his method of elaborating? To criticize the wall of text? That so low..
Discussion's spotlight should not be about the motive or the method or who was talking, discussion's spotlight should be the thing that matters. We should respect every opinion and count every facts brought to the table.
How if, that shadowrisen refuse to hear your thoughts about the game because you can't even make a proper paragraph to elaborate. You should not join the the discussion. Doesn't it feels as an attack to you, yep?
But no, he not do that or attack your persona in any other way. He instead elaborate his point again and again and counter your argument. Which is very noble thing to have in discussion. I can't be that patience. That's a patience of real life lawyer for sure.
tldr
Thanks for quoting my wall of text for nothing so it can be read twice. And now I quoting your quote so it can be read thrice!
What a value. Thank you!!
maybe you should shorten your wall of text and get to the point
Come on, Yep, accusing someone in discussion to be get paid as a spy is clearly an attack. You doesn't have to be sensitive to know it. And then change the course discussion to attack his method of elaborating? To criticize the wall of text? That so low..
Discussion's spotlight should not be about the motive or the method or who was talking, discussion's spotlight should be the thing that matters. We should respect every opinion and count every facts brought to the table.
How if, that shadowrisen refuse to hear your thoughts about the game because you can't even make a proper paragraph to elaborate. You should not join the the discussion. Doesn't it feels as an attack to you, yep?
But no, he not do that or attack your persona in any other way. He instead elaborate his point again and again and counter your argument. Which is very noble thing to have in discussion. I can't be that patience. That's a patience of real life lawyer for sure.
At least shadowrisens walls of text were legible and had correct grammar, this right here is just cancer
I don't use a tracker, but it's not that hard. When I play any mode, I can easily see when I'm facing more Priests than I should, because I instantly end an Arena/Duels Run, or I instantly lose a bunch of stars back to a floor. That is how I lose like 7 or 8 stars in a matter of 10 minutes, I concede to Priests.
Could be they just delayed it or the first version was just beyond shitty XD
But I would never accuse Blizzard of ever being dishonest. They are the best people on earth! Now please give me a golden legendary in my next pack :P
I agree blizzard people are good people
golden legendary plox
damn sorry to hear that. I mean it's not exactly an unpopular class, but I suppose it's one of the medium played ones in arena and duels... You should be facing more DH I believe. Maybe team 5 just hate you...
Yeah, in theory I would face more DH, I would like that very much, but no, it's a spam of Priests. From what you are saying I should be seeing them in opposite amounts, more DH and less Priest. It is not even close, Demon Hunter are rare compared to Priests.
Wait, they pay you in $? I get only packs :(
I used to get packs. Then I wrote the wall of text to end all walls of text. It had the fanciest, most impressive words . . . the best words . . . everyone said so. I mean it had to be at least . . . 5 paragraphs.
Now I get paid by the word, so the wallier the wall, the better.
EDIT: In more serious terms, I think I got a life-changing job today, so that's good.
I don't usually commented, but I got irritated by how yepapep and popeye randomly attack person in the internet just because he elaborate his opinion clearly. If I was the moderator, this is not kind of discussion I wanted and both person should have get banned.
Discussion should stay objective and based on the what point discussed, or what statement brought to the table, not suddenly changed to attacking the person who just gives his opinion on the topic. Only a very low person do that.
Also, surely my paragraph above is out of topic discussion. But I feel the need to pointed this out because this will be unhealthy forum to have. And I want this two people to know that this their harassment (?) to shadowrisen Is actually more hurtful to read than the wall of text shadowrisen has wrote. And I don't like the wall of text either but I still read it and doesn't feel bad about it, at all.
i applaud how you reason out to those who is attacking you and not the argument.
when they use "Ad hominem", just don't reply its not educational or entertaining anymore.
Good luck with the new job you got.
how is saying tldr a personal attack?
yall too sensetive
I only got personal when his responses were condescending toward my intelligence, saying I was complaining because I was too stupid to understand his book. Like fr, i’m all for giving ones opinion but Jesus Christ, his opinion literally could’ve been edited down to 5-6 sentences. And when I say something toward that he responds by assuming I just dint have the literacy to understand the information within. Narcissistic at it’s finest and your a snowflake at it’s finest
To ALL of you defending blizzard, are you telling us that the game is truly random, there is no pre-defined matchmaking, there is no gambling strategy behind the game and that whoever is best wins??
There is definitive and published proof that the game is driven by sophisticated blizzard algorithms, not the players or luck, what on earth are you going on about?!?
Blizzard started investing in forums i see .. nice.at least we know they hear us.and that video is 100% real.every time i craft a new legendary .. that legendary gets intk the honeymoon period for at least 5 games(being the card that wins the game).and Random ( as generated by a computer ) does not exist . Machines know algorithms . That s all.
That’s exactly my point in the previous post. a) it’s obvious to whoever plays 4-5 games, more importantly b) it’s published evidence, written by blizzard’s lawyers. What other proof do these flat earthers need??
Come on, Yep, accusing someone in discussion to be get paid as a spy is clearly an attack. You doesn't have to be sensitive to know it. And then change the course discussion to attack his method of elaborating? To criticize the wall of text? That so low..
Discussion's spotlight should not be about the motive or the method or who was talking, discussion's spotlight should be the thing that matters. We should respect every opinion and count every facts brought to the table.
How if, that shadowrisen refuse to hear your thoughts about the game because you can't even make a proper paragraph to elaborate. You should not join the the discussion. Doesn't it feels as an attack to you, yep?
But no, he not do that or attack your persona in any other way. He instead elaborate his point again and again and counter your argument. Which is very noble thing to have in discussion. I can't be that patience. That's a patience of real life lawyer for sure.
tldr
Thanks for quoting my wall of text for nothing so it can be read twice. And now I quoting your quote so it can be read thrice!
What a value. Thank you!!
maybe you should shorten your wall of text and get to the point
At least shadowrisens walls of text were legible and had correct grammar, this right here is just cancer
This one too
https://youtube.com/watch?v=g8FIefv8API
Started Nov 2015 @ eu: DH 32 /Dr 268 / Hu 611 / Ma 2365 / Pa 1000 / Pr 870 / Ro 1514 / Sh 1209 / Wl 590 / Wr 536