I wouldn't completely trust the data at least with paladin. Just wait a week or two for people to figure out how the nerfs affected the meta and what class is best. I will say however that hunter is indeed in a good spot at the moment after I went 7-1 with my own list to legend. Didn't run into any paladins though.
never trust on HSreplay data ... they take their statistics from DeckTracker .... everyone knows that you can delete duel history or if you left games , losses are not count
Paladin was on the top basically since the very beginning of the format and I was struggling to see any on the higher ladder.
Also more reliable piece of information is looking at the higher ranks. I do not necessarily downplay Gold or Plat. But there's hell a lot of people playing on Bronze and Silver and if anything - these at least should always be excluded.
Agreed, I find the premium stats to be better. Their meta stats are usually for the average of all players, which includes a lot of piss poor players and not optimal decks. It does reflect the general meta, but it does not include outlier and high skill decks for their stats for when they are played optimally.
All I know is that pre-nerf I couldn't get any traction with my Highlander Hunter deck. Now I've shot from Platinum 2 to Diamond 5 with only a single loss. I spanked murloc paladins and mages, stole a few games from priests, and my only loss was to a Warrior that drew the nuts. Highlander Hunter is back baby!
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Hunter and Pally are the best classes now :D
I wouldn't completely trust the data at least with paladin. Just wait a week or two for people to figure out how the nerfs affected the meta and what class is best. I will say however that hunter is indeed in a good spot at the moment after I went 7-1 with my own list to legend. Didn't run into any paladins though.
never trust on HSreplay data ... they take their statistics from DeckTracker .... everyone knows that you can delete duel history or if you left games , losses are not count
Paladin was on the top basically since the very beginning of the format and I was struggling to see any on the higher ladder.
Also more reliable piece of information is looking at the higher ranks. I do not necessarily downplay Gold or Plat. But there's hell a lot of people playing on Bronze and Silver and if anything - these at least should always be excluded.
You are not using HSReplay Premium Stats either, the one on Frontpage is usually inaccurate.
Agreed, I find the premium stats to be better. Their meta stats are usually for the average of all players, which includes a lot of piss poor players and not optimal decks. It does reflect the general meta, but it does not include outlier and high skill decks for their stats for when they are played optimally.
I warrior still good? Was thinking about dusting DQ Alextrazsa and craft Ancharr
Expansion coming so these stats now useless anyway. We all know any class only need 2-3 broken cards to rise from deep bottom to the top
With my warrior I always win against paladins and hunters. I have hard times against priests and mages though...
If you think warrior is bottom of the barrel your SADLY MISTAKEN LOL!!
:)
https://hsreplay.net/replay/27u2NJTZZJgToJ6k6n5BTM
Anyone got the winrate stats at legend or diamond5-legend rank?
OP: Rip Demon hunter.
Data: demon hunter is a top 4 class.
heh
Good. Now imprison him for 10000 years.
Warrior being low is more a function of it being a high skill class. Combo and armor warrior are both very good.
Here’s top EU legend. Paladin and hunter still reign supreme
All I know is that pre-nerf I couldn't get any traction with my Highlander Hunter deck. Now I've shot from Platinum 2 to Diamond 5 with only a single loss. I spanked murloc paladins and mages, stole a few games from priests, and my only loss was to a Warrior that drew the nuts. Highlander Hunter is back baby!