Hearthpwn

Quote from jazzfan27 >>

Meh, I've tried using albatross vs. Highlander Hunter.  It just isn't good enough.

When it was 3 mana it might have been worth including going turn 4 into psychopomp.  Turn 4 albatross into turn 5 psychopomp just leaves you dead.

 Now we have the answer... You're mad that Highlander Hunter counters Priest... The Surge in appearance of Priest is why there's so many HL Hunters out there now... Play any other deck and it's not so bad.

It should have been the other way round. Un-nerf albatross and make highlander decks run an understatted tech card with a high mana cost for removing 1 mana minions. That way they lose valuable deck space to a poor card that maybe useless, may burn their own useful 1 mana cards but do have an answer to BLA.

Quote from jazzfan27 >>

Meh, I've tried using albatross vs. Highlander Hunter.  It just isn't good enough.

When it was 3 mana it might have been worth including going turn 4 into psychopomp.  Turn 4 albatross into turn 5 psychopomp just leaves you dead.

 So you play priest? Well highlander hunter is maybe the worst matchup for priest alongside with highlander rogue. So you are asking a nerf to highlander decks cause they counter the deck you play?

I would rather see anti-quest tech. Quests are played on a large scale and in wild there are even more quests. Personally I meet a lot of decks that use quests in their deck. Maybe something like remove two quest points from your opponents quest, 3 mana 2/2, epic/rare. Or maybe even something harsher.

Quote from TheFFsage >>

Quote from jazzfan27 >>

Meh, I've tried using albatross vs. Highlander Hunter.  It just isn't good enough.

When it was 3 mana it might have been worth including going turn 4 into psychopomp.  Turn 4 albatross into turn 5 psychopomp just leaves you dead.

 So you play priest? Well highlander hunter is maybe the worst matchup for priest alongside with highlander rogue. So you are asking a nerf to highlander decks cause they counter the deck you play?

 Not asking to nerf them.  Only to have the tools to be able to build my deck to withstand them.  I'm willing to hurt my win% some vs. other decks, but the tech card actually has to make a difference in the matchup I'm trying to adjust.  And Albatross isn't making a difference for me in my matchup vs. Highlander Hunter.  So, there is no point in playing Albatross.  

I think they over-nerfed it.  Probably making it a 3/3 would have been sufficient.  Even as a 3/2 for 3 it would probably have been better than it is now.