Ohhh I cannot wait for the sac pact nerf. They can do whatever they want with altruis, Glaivebound. Once warlocks don't have their ridiculously broken "0 mana destroy a 7 drop heal 5," they're going to be food again.
Ohhh I cannot wait for the sac pact nerf. They can do whatever they want with altruis, Glaivebound. Once warlocks don't have their ridiculously broken "0 mana destroy a 7 drop heal 5," they're going to be food again.
Someone is enjoying the free wins from a broken class.
Ohhh I cannot wait for the sac pact nerf. They can do whatever they want with altruis, Glaivebound. Once warlocks don't have their ridiculously broken "0 mana destroy a 7 drop heal 5," they're going to be food again.
Someone is enjoying the free wins from a broken class.
so it would seem. kids getting angry couse their WR dropped below 51% after the class got a little tuned ;)
On a serious note noone would be techin' sac pack if DH wasn't so busted. But hey lets kill a counterplay that keeps it at least a little bit in check, let's pretend it's "for jaraxxus" and instead of just balancing the power level of class cards. sounds like a good plan.
also, albatross should become like 3/2 for 3mana or 3/3 for 4 or something. 4/3 for 3 is decent, 4/3 for 3 that dickslaps your worst matchup as aggro is just too good.
Ohhh I cannot wait for the sac pact nerf. They can do whatever they want with altruis, Glaivebound. Once warlocks don't have their ridiculously broken "0 mana destroy a 7 drop heal 5," they're going to be food again.
Someone is enjoying the free wins from a broken class.
so it would seem. kids getting angry couse their WR dropped below 51% after the class got a little tuned ;)
On a serious note noone would be techin' sac pack if DH wasn't so busted. But hey lets kill a counterplay that keeps it at least a little bit in check, let's pretend it's "for jaraxxus" and instead of just balancing the power level of class cards. sounds like a good plan.
This is ignorant and has nothing to do with anger or the like. It has been broached many times on this forum, and not once have a seen a good response. And that is that sac pact, in its current form, was fine when the only class it effected was its own class. Warlocks, other than some bad neutral ones, were the only ones with demons worth playing. That's not the case anymore.
People's blind rage against demon hunters completely warps their logical thinking. There is not a single good counter argument that I have heard that can convince me that sac pact should remain as is now that a non warlock class runs demons.
Oh and even when it does get changed to friendly only, gala lock will still run two because 0 mana heal 5 and only having to lose one imp will still be good in warlock.
Ohhh I cannot wait for the sac pact nerf. They can do whatever they want with altruis, Glaivebound. Once warlocks don't have their ridiculously broken "0 mana destroy a 7 drop heal 5," they're going to be food again.
Someone is enjoying the free wins from a broken class.
Ohhh I cannot wait for the sac pact nerf. They can do whatever they want with altruis, Glaivebound. Once warlocks don't have their ridiculously broken "0 mana destroy a 7 drop heal 5," they're going to be food again.
Someone is enjoying the free wins from a broken class.
so it would seem. kids getting angry couse their WR dropped below 51% after the class got a little tuned ;)
On a serious note noone would be techin' sac pack if DH wasn't so busted. But hey lets kill a counterplay that keeps it at least a little bit in check, let's pretend it's "for jaraxxus" and instead of just balancing the power level of class cards. sounds like a good plan.
This is ignorant and has nothing to do with anger or the like. It has been broached many times on this forum, and not once have a seen a good response. And that is that sac pact, in its current form, was fine when the only class it effected was its own class. Warlocks, other than some bad neutral ones, were the only ones with demons worth playing. That's not the case anymore.
People's blind rage against demon hunters completely warps their logical thinking. There is not a single good counter argument that I have heard that can convince me that sac pact should remain as is now that a non warlock class runs demons.
Oh and even when it does get changed to friendly only, gala lock will still run two because 0 mana heal 5 and only having to lose one imp will still be good in warlock.
0 mana, gain 5 life, lose 2 card spots in the deck. yeah.. no, not that good.
Ohhh I cannot wait for the sac pact nerf. They can do whatever they want with altruis, Glaivebound. Once warlocks don't have their ridiculously broken "0 mana destroy a 7 drop heal 5," they're going to be food again.
Someone is enjoying the free wins from a broken class.
so it would seem. kids getting angry couse their WR dropped below 51% after the class got a little tuned ;)
On a serious note noone would be techin' sac pack if DH wasn't so busted. But hey lets kill a counterplay that keeps it at least a little bit in check, let's pretend it's "for jaraxxus" and instead of just balancing the power level of class cards. sounds like a good plan.
This is ignorant and has nothing to do with anger or the like. It has been broached many times on this forum, and not once have a seen a good response. And that is that sac pact, in its current form, was fine when the only class it effected was its own class. Warlocks, other than some bad neutral ones, were the only ones with demons worth playing. That's not the case anymore.
People's blind rage against demon hunters completely warps their logical thinking. There is not a single good counter argument that I have heard that can convince me that sac pact should remain as is now that a non warlock class runs demons.
Oh and even when it does get changed to friendly only, gala lock will still run two because 0 mana heal 5 and only having to lose one imp will still be good in warlock.
0 mana, gain 5 life, lose 2 card spots in the deck. yeah.. no, not that good.
They were running it before DH came out so I have literally no idea what you're talking about lol.
Ohhh I cannot wait for the sac pact nerf. They can do whatever they want with altruis, Glaivebound. Once warlocks don't have their ridiculously broken "0 mana destroy a 7 drop heal 5," they're going to be food again.
Someone is enjoying the free wins from a broken class.
so it would seem. kids getting angry couse their WR dropped below 51% after the class got a little tuned ;)
On a serious note noone would be techin' sac pack if DH wasn't so busted. But hey lets kill a counterplay that keeps it at least a little bit in check, let's pretend it's "for jaraxxus" and instead of just balancing the power level of class cards. sounds like a good plan.
This is ignorant and has nothing to do with anger or the like. It has been broached many times on this forum, and not once have a seen a good response. And that is that sac pact, in its current form, was fine when the only class it effected was its own class. Warlocks, other than some bad neutral ones, were the only ones with demons worth playing. That's not the case anymore.
People's blind rage against demon hunters completely warps their logical thinking. There is not a single good counter argument that I have heard that can convince me that sac pact should remain as is now that a non warlock class runs demons.
Oh and even when it does get changed to friendly only, gala lock will still run two because 0 mana heal 5 and only having to lose one imp will still be good in warlock.
0 mana, gain 5 life, lose 2 card spots in the deck. yeah.. no, not that good.
They were running it before DH came out so I have literally no idea what you're talking about lol.
it was a tier3 deck then. show me your posts from back then lamenting over how op sac pac was. i somehow dont think you can. It rose to t1 because it's a strong counter to dh.
Ohhh I cannot wait for the sac pact nerf. They can do whatever they want with altruis, Glaivebound. Once warlocks don't have their ridiculously broken "0 mana destroy a 7 drop heal 5," they're going to be food again.
Someone is enjoying the free wins from a broken class.
so it would seem. kids getting angry couse their WR dropped below 51% after the class got a little tuned ;)
On a serious note noone would be techin' sac pack if DH wasn't so busted. But hey lets kill a counterplay that keeps it at least a little bit in check, let's pretend it's "for jaraxxus" and instead of just balancing the power level of class cards. sounds like a good plan.
This is ignorant and has nothing to do with anger or the like. It has been broached many times on this forum, and not once have a seen a good response. And that is that sac pact, in its current form, was fine when the only class it effected was its own class. Warlocks, other than some bad neutral ones, were the only ones with demons worth playing. That's not the case anymore.
People's blind rage against demon hunters completely warps their logical thinking. There is not a single good counter argument that I have heard that can convince me that sac pact should remain as is now that a non warlock class runs demons.
Oh and even when it does get changed to friendly only, gala lock will still run two because 0 mana heal 5 and only having to lose one imp will still be good in warlock.
0 mana, gain 5 life, lose 2 card spots in the deck. yeah.. no, not that good.
They were running it before DH came out so I have literally no idea what you're talking about lol.
it was a tier3 deck then. show me your posts from back then lamenting over how op sac pac was. i somehow dont think you can. It rose to t1 because it's a strong counter to dh.
You clearly haven't been paying attention at all. Of course I didn't make a post about it being op before a class other than warlock had decent demons, because it wasn't. But now there is a class that runs them, and it's too oppressive for now and for future designs, which is obviously agreed with since it is getting nerfed.
I'm guessing Albatross will go to either 4 or 5 mana, Kael'thas 7 or 8 mana, Felwing 5 or 6 mana and Sac Pact only friendly demons.
https://www.newsweek.com/hearthstone-lead-developer-pushed-demon-hunter-limit-1498399
"The thing we are trying to get away from is being able to cast a card on a turn you have no business casting it on"
Fucking KEKW, they suck at it so hard. Mana cheating was always busted in Hearthstone and still is
They've already confirmed it's getting nerfed lol. It's the most played non-legendary neutral card.
"If you are really only interested in winning games, you should take Albatross out of your deck"
Proceeds to nerf the card.
Sacrificial Pact is going to be friendly demons only. Hopefully that doesn't boost Demon Hunter too much.
why nerf felwing?????, not even op since my shaman hero power cant damage.
There are other classes too you know
Thanks for making a new account just to tell us that important info. It's getting nerfed so you may go now.
And no other class can keep up with DH? Coincidence?
Ohhh I cannot wait for the sac pact nerf. They can do whatever they want with altruis, Glaivebound. Once warlocks don't have their ridiculously broken "0 mana destroy a 7 drop heal 5," they're going to be food again.
Someone is enjoying the free wins from a broken class.
let's all be equally fucked, love your line of thinking.
Sac Pact ain't busted, it's the demons DH has makes it so good.
so it would seem. kids getting angry couse their WR dropped below 51% after the class got a little tuned ;)
On a serious note noone would be techin' sac pack if DH wasn't so busted. But hey lets kill a counterplay that keeps it at least a little bit in check, let's pretend it's "for jaraxxus" and instead of just balancing the power level of class cards. sounds like a good plan.
also, albatross should become like 3/2 for 3mana or 3/3 for 4 or something. 4/3 for 3 is decent, 4/3 for 3 that dickslaps your worst matchup as aggro is just too good.
This is ignorant and has nothing to do with anger or the like. It has been broached many times on this forum, and not once have a seen a good response. And that is that sac pact, in its current form, was fine when the only class it effected was its own class. Warlocks, other than some bad neutral ones, were the only ones with demons worth playing. That's not the case anymore.
People's blind rage against demon hunters completely warps their logical thinking. There is not a single good counter argument that I have heard that can convince me that sac pact should remain as is now that a non warlock class runs demons.
Oh and even when it does get changed to friendly only, gala lock will still run two because 0 mana heal 5 and only having to lose one imp will still be good in warlock.
They're nerfing it more so stop complaining?
0 mana, gain 5 life, lose 2 card spots in the deck. yeah.. no, not that good.
They were running it before DH came out so I have literally no idea what you're talking about lol.
it was a tier3 deck then. show me your posts from back then lamenting over how op sac pac was. i somehow dont think you can. It rose to t1 because it's a strong counter to dh.
https://tempostorm.com/hearthstone/meta-snapshot/standard/2020-03-31
You clearly haven't been paying attention at all. Of course I didn't make a post about it being op before a class other than warlock had decent demons, because it wasn't. But now there is a class that runs them, and it's too oppressive for now and for future designs, which is obviously agreed with since it is getting nerfed.
Tempostorm OMEGALUL