I enjoy that there is more than one archetype of priest now, the new stealing cards are very interesting in my opinion, too. So many people complaining about the games being too long... I actually enjoy games that are not just decided by who can do more face damage within the first five turns. Some people like games that take more than five minutes where you have to think several turns ahead and try to create as much value as possible.
You play an aggressive deck and hate playing against priest(or any kind of control deck) because you lose after 15 minutes+? You clearly doing something wrong, if you can't tell the game is over when your aggrodeck hasn't beaten the other deck by turn 10 and you keep playing, that is your own fault. I played against a face hunter yesterday who only conceded after he played the very last card in his deck. I was at 20+ health the whole game and had have control over the board since turn 5. But it sure was my fault the game took so long...
similar idea actually comes to my mind before.... some players hate priests because they do aggro and can only do aggro, and they have not noticed this for themselves :P~~~
... so everytime their broads are being controlled by oppo, they think the oppo is using a deck out of ordinary. they think there is only one playing style : 5 rounds of face hitting with some 1-2-3 drops determines who win. :P~~~
Priest won't make new players quit as fast as face hunter can.
Trust me, it will. Faster than a light year.
Hunter losses are mostly painless, happens before you know it. Turn 5, its over. Now this sound obnoxious, that I agree with. Priest games are a fucking torture. Resurrect mechanic is the worst thing a card game can experience. Priest minions are already annoying to deal with in the first place (Convincing Infitrator, and Obsidian Statue if you play wild)
What's even worse for me is, I love control/attrition types of priest decks. Its Galakrond is the one I played the most out of all 5. But those damn mirrors make me question my life in a bad way.
How is it painless when you lose after 5 rounds game after game after game???
Neither of these classes are 'game after game after game' for one. They are both in meta, but the not only card with hunter being slightly more prevalent.
Not true. You can easily meet 3 hunters or rogues game after game, which does not happen with any other class.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
The win rate isn't the issue. Res priest is a problem because the cards the opponent plays are largely irrelevant.
Control highlander shaman owns res priest. The problem is that it loses vs anything else.
similar idea actually comes to my mind before....
some players hate priests because they do aggro and can only do aggro,
and they have not noticed this for themselves :P~~~
... so everytime their broads are being controlled by oppo,
they think the oppo is using a deck out of ordinary.
they think there is only one playing style : 5 rounds of face hitting with some 1-2-3 drops determines who win. :P~~~
:P~~~
Not true. You can easily meet 3 hunters or rogues game after game, which does not happen with any other class.