It is hard to not troll, when you basicaly helping more and more. For example you can look on bold ones in your last message. I really don't see anything superior on your arguments. It is just ridiculusly funny how you can't understand how much proud person you are.:-D
You know what, fair enough. My bad for taking you seriously, clearly you're just an idiot lol.
Good grief. Again, my argument, which consists of me making the point that legend requires skill, time, and dedication to achieve, does not make presumptions. Me presuming that you and elnur are lower ranked has no direct correlation to aforementioned argument, it's just an off the cuff observation that I'm making bc both of you seem like you don't know what you're talking about. As for your feeling that you would mop the floor with legend players in arena, you're certainly entitled to feel however you like. That doesn't mean your feeling is even remotely realistic/true tho. The primary problem I see with your argument is that you're not couching anything you're saying in logic or rationale or experience. You're just saying you think and feel stuff, but you can't back any of it up. Plenty of people make mistakes sure, you see it all the time at high rank. What separates the best players from very good or average players is that they make less mistakes on average: they are more consistent. Also, you took my assertion of you saying "any legend player [could be] mediocre" out of context, and it doesn't misinterpret your argument at all. You said legend players "can even be pretty mediocre". That's a direct quote. I said it's difficult to make the case that any legend players are mediocre bc they are the top 0.1 percent of all players. No contradiction or presumption there.
I would react untraditional from end to start...
Ok we can assume i maid presumption and you maid presumption. Than i just ask, why the hell are you react on something out of context. Or why else would you argument... On my "legends can be mediocre players" by answering "all legends can't be mediocre". Becose i was presumptional only becosei thought it was reaction to context and not some random sentence just to write at least something close to the theme. (Like hey, global warming can cause lost of house to sea... Yeah? But people in Tibet are pretty safe.)
Nevermore... pointless to prolonging who is presumptional.
And to the point...
Everybody base on feeling, nobody have hardproof data of how much people in legend are people without misstakes, with few misstakes, with lots of misstakes... SO there definitely is not way to base information on other basis then are our feels/knowledge. And each of us would have different feels/knowledge, becose we all live different lives.
For me it more like... I was once legends and it was so hard for me, pleas stop letting fown value of my achievment. Man, it doesn't matter how others looks on it, if you feel like it was achievment, then it was achievment for you. For me is for example achievment which i am proud of beating Rastakhan Rumble with hunter overkill cost reduce, even if nobody else five it value.
So now i am maybe presumptional, but ve honest to yourself... When you wrote "That doesn't mean your feeling is even remotely realistic/true tho." didn't you in real just completly denied my idea about how being legend does not neccesery mean you should be proud of your game skill in HS? And it is about everything what i wrote... If you want just completly denny all what i write you definetly can. But please stop transform meaning of words back in time... Like hey i didn't meaned it like absolutly denny. It should be more like... You are not close, becose it is something and it will be something. Which i would agree it is something. Not everybody have legend. But i still say on the same time... That this something mean almost same to nothing if its primary meaning you are skillfull master in game is almost nonexistent.
Ok, this is clearly a language barrier issue. You don't know what I mean when I say you took something out of context and you may not know what presumption means. To be honest I'm not entirely sure what you're attempting to say in general with this last post, but I do want to say a few things to try to address what I think you're saying. To start with, this is not personal to me. The points I've made thus far were not made to attempt to defend myself or what an achievement in a game means to me. I don't need to validate what achieving legend means to you. What I've said is an honest representation of my perspective, which I've substantiated with my own experience, knowledge, and logic. Where I take issue is that you and one or two others are attempting to speak on said achievement when you ostensibly have no experience, factual evidence, or convincing reasoning to legitimize anything you're saying. You can't say you know what it's like to get to legend bc you've never gotten to legend, you can't provide statistics to prove your argument bc they directly contradict it (if legend is so easy how is that only 0.1 percent of the player base is there?), and the best rationale you could up with to support your argument is "I saw some players in legend on streams and I didn't think they were good". In sum, you have no experience, you have no evidence, and your logic is weak and predicated solely on your opinion. I'm sorry if you can't understand everything that I'm saying, but I hope the main theme of it comes across here.
Presumption is guessing for others or?
Than sorry, i really felt like you i hit you somewhere where it hurt, which i definitely didn't aim. Like i want just argue about why i have my opinion on this theme like this...
But, there is no value in arguing by "You can't prove i am wrong!", when you can't prove you are right either. Or how is your experience more valuable than my? Are you better human? I don't get it. (Or do you want say. Living here where i live is definitely good place to live. Why? Becose i live here. And you will never prove me wrong. Muhahaha!!!Or at least this is how i picture you.:-D)
And yes it is my best argument, as videos of actual misstakes are better proof than... Huh, could there be better evidence?
This is kind of a pointless argument at this stage, and it kinda feels like you're trolling tbh. I've demonstrated multiple times at length why my argument is superior to yours. My experience is more relevant than yours bc I have it firsthand (meaning I've been thru the grind to get legend and you haven't) and you don't. If you can't understand this extremely simple principle then, again, there's no reason to continue this conversation. I acknowledge it may be a language issue, but what I'm saying is not difficult to understand. My logic is superior to yours bc it's based on actual empirical evidence (read: statistics), common sense, and the direct experience I just mentioned, whereas yours is based on what you think and literally nothing else. If you can't understand what I mean than I suggest you refrain from posting further until you learn better English or, if that isn't the issue, learn how to understand information.
Videos in which people make mistakes means absolutely nothing BTW, lol, and I already addressed this in a prior comment. Every single person that has ever played HS has made mistakes, legend players are no exception to that rule. This is not "evidence" that legend is easy to achieve, it's evidence that they play the game.
It is hard to not troll, when you basicaly helping more and more. For example you can look on bold ones in your last message. I really don't see anything superior on your arguments. It is just ridiculusly funny how you can't understand how much proud person you are.:-D
he has mental problems fam , leave him alone in his little hearthstone universe :D
Good grief. Again, my argument, which consists of me making the point that legend requires skill, time, and dedication to achieve, does not make presumptions. Me presuming that you and elnur are lower ranked has no direct correlation to aforementioned argument, it's just an off the cuff observation that I'm making bc both of you seem like you don't know what you're talking about. As for your feeling that you would mop the floor with legend players in arena, you're certainly entitled to feel however you like. That doesn't mean your feeling is even remotely realistic/true tho. The primary problem I see with your argument is that you're not couching anything you're saying in logic or rationale or experience. You're just saying you think and feel stuff, but you can't back any of it up. Plenty of people make mistakes sure, you see it all the time at high rank. What separates the best players from very good or average players is that they make less mistakes on average: they are more consistent. Also, you took my assertion of you saying "any legend player [could be] mediocre" out of context, and it doesn't misinterpret your argument at all. You said legend players "can even be pretty mediocre". That's a direct quote. I said it's difficult to make the case that any legend players are mediocre bc they are the top 0.1 percent of all players. No contradiction or presumption there.
I would react untraditional from end to start...
Ok we can assume i maid presumption and you maid presumption. Than i just ask, why the hell are you react on something out of context. Or why else would you argument... On my "legends can be mediocre players" by answering "all legends can't be mediocre". Becose i was presumptional only becosei thought it was reaction to context and not some random sentence just to write at least something close to the theme. (Like hey, global warming can cause lost of house to sea... Yeah? But people in Tibet are pretty safe.)
Nevermore... pointless to prolonging who is presumptional.
And to the point...
Everybody base on feeling, nobody have hardproof data of how much people in legend are people without misstakes, with few misstakes, with lots of misstakes... SO there definitely is not way to base information on other basis then are our feels/knowledge. And each of us would have different feels/knowledge, becose we all live different lives.
For me it more like... I was once legends and it was so hard for me, pleas stop letting fown value of my achievment. Man, it doesn't matter how others looks on it, if you feel like it was achievment, then it was achievment for you. For me is for example achievment which i am proud of beating Rastakhan Rumble with hunter overkill cost reduce, even if nobody else five it value.
So now i am maybe presumptional, but ve honest to yourself... When you wrote "That doesn't mean your feeling is even remotely realistic/true tho." didn't you in real just completly denied my idea about how being legend does not neccesery mean you should be proud of your game skill in HS? And it is about everything what i wrote... If you want just completly denny all what i write you definetly can. But please stop transform meaning of words back in time... Like hey i didn't meaned it like absolutly denny. It should be more like... You are not close, becose it is something and it will be something. Which i would agree it is something. Not everybody have legend. But i still say on the same time... That this something mean almost same to nothing if its primary meaning you are skillfull master in game is almost nonexistent.
Ok, this is clearly a language barrier issue. You don't know what I mean when I say you took something out of context and you may not know what presumption means. To be honest I'm not entirely sure what you're attempting to say in general with this last post, but I do want to say a few things to try to address what I think you're saying. To start with, this is not personal to me. The points I've made thus far were not made to attempt to defend myself or what an achievement in a game means to me. I don't need to validate what achieving legend means to you. What I've said is an honest representation of my perspective, which I've substantiated with my own experience, knowledge, and logic. Where I take issue is that you and one or two others are attempting to speak on said achievement when you ostensibly have no experience, factual evidence, or convincing reasoning to legitimize anything you're saying. You can't say you know what it's like to get to legend bc you've never gotten to legend, you can't provide statistics to prove your argument bc they directly contradict it (if legend is so easy how is that only 0.1 percent of the player base is there?), and the best rationale you could up with to support your argument is "I saw some players in legend on streams and I didn't think they were good". In sum, you have no experience, you have no evidence, and your logic is weak and predicated solely on your opinion. I'm sorry if you can't understand everything that I'm saying, but I hope the main theme of it comes across here.
Presumption is guessing for others or?
Than sorry, i really felt like you i hit you somewhere where it hurt, which i definitely didn't aim. Like i want just argue about why i have my opinion on this theme like this...
But, there is no value in arguing by "You can't prove i am wrong!", when you can't prove you are right either. Or how is your experience more valuable than my? Are you better human? I don't get it. (Or do you want say. Living here where i live is definitely good place to live. Why? Becose i live here. And you will never prove me wrong. Muhahaha!!!Or at least this is how i picture you.:-D)
And yes it is my best argument, as videos of actual misstakes are better proof than... Huh, could there be better evidence?
This is kind of a pointless argument at this stage, and it kinda feels like you're trolling tbh. I've demonstrated multiple times at length why my argument is superior to yours. My experience is more relevant than yours bc I have it firsthand (meaning I've been thru the grind to get legend and you haven't) and you don't. If you can't understand this extremely simple principle then, again, there's no reason to continue this conversation. I acknowledge it may be a language issue, but what I'm saying is not difficult to understand. My logic is superior to yours bc it's based on actual empirical evidence (read: statistics), common sense, and the direct experience I just mentioned, whereas yours is based on what you think and literally nothing else. If you can't understand what I mean than I suggest you refrain from posting further until you learn better English or, if that isn't the issue, learn how to understand information.
Videos in which people make mistakes means absolutely nothing BTW, lol, and I already addressed this in a prior comment. Every single person that has ever played HS has made mistakes, legend players are no exception to that rule. This is not "evidence" that legend is easy to achieve, it's evidence that they play the game.
It is hard to not troll, when you basicaly helping more and more. For example you can look on bold ones in your last message. I really don't see anything superior on your arguments. It is just ridiculusly funny how you can't understand how much proud person you are.:-D
he has mental problems fam , leave him alone in his little hearthstone universe :D
Ad hominem bc you got shut down the last time you tried to post on here and now you have to resort to trolling. Classic response from idiots that know they lost an argument but don't want to admit that they made a complete fool out of themselves, lol.
Good grief. Again, my argument, which consists of me making the point that legend requires skill, time, and dedication to achieve, does not make presumptions. Me presuming that you and elnur are lower ranked has no direct correlation to aforementioned argument, it's just an off the cuff observation that I'm making bc both of you seem like you don't know what you're talking about. As for your feeling that you would mop the floor with legend players in arena, you're certainly entitled to feel however you like. That doesn't mean your feeling is even remotely realistic/true tho. The primary problem I see with your argument is that you're not couching anything you're saying in logic or rationale or experience. You're just saying you think and feel stuff, but you can't back any of it up. Plenty of people make mistakes sure, you see it all the time at high rank. What separates the best players from very good or average players is that they make less mistakes on average: they are more consistent. Also, you took my assertion of you saying "any legend player [could be] mediocre" out of context, and it doesn't misinterpret your argument at all. You said legend players "can even be pretty mediocre". That's a direct quote. I said it's difficult to make the case that any legend players are mediocre bc they are the top 0.1 percent of all players. No contradiction or presumption there.
I would react untraditional from end to start...
Ok we can assume i maid presumption and you maid presumption. Than i just ask, why the hell are you react on something out of context. Or why else would you argument... On my "legends can be mediocre players" by answering "all legends can't be mediocre". Becose i was presumptional only becosei thought it was reaction to context and not some random sentence just to write at least something close to the theme. (Like hey, global warming can cause lost of house to sea... Yeah? But people in Tibet are pretty safe.)
Nevermore... pointless to prolonging who is presumptional.
And to the point...
Everybody base on feeling, nobody have hardproof data of how much people in legend are people without misstakes, with few misstakes, with lots of misstakes... SO there definitely is not way to base information on other basis then are our feels/knowledge. And each of us would have different feels/knowledge, becose we all live different lives.
For me it more like... I was once legends and it was so hard for me, pleas stop letting fown value of my achievment. Man, it doesn't matter how others looks on it, if you feel like it was achievment, then it was achievment for you. For me is for example achievment which i am proud of beating Rastakhan Rumble with hunter overkill cost reduce, even if nobody else five it value.
So now i am maybe presumptional, but ve honest to yourself... When you wrote "That doesn't mean your feeling is even remotely realistic/true tho." didn't you in real just completly denied my idea about how being legend does not neccesery mean you should be proud of your game skill in HS? And it is about everything what i wrote... If you want just completly denny all what i write you definetly can. But please stop transform meaning of words back in time... Like hey i didn't meaned it like absolutly denny. It should be more like... You are not close, becose it is something and it will be something. Which i would agree it is something. Not everybody have legend. But i still say on the same time... That this something mean almost same to nothing if its primary meaning you are skillfull master in game is almost nonexistent.
Ok, this is clearly a language barrier issue. You don't know what I mean when I say you took something out of context and you may not know what presumption means. To be honest I'm not entirely sure what you're attempting to say in general with this last post, but I do want to say a few things to try to address what I think you're saying. To start with, this is not personal to me. The points I've made thus far were not made to attempt to defend myself or what an achievement in a game means to me. I don't need to validate what achieving legend means to you. What I've said is an honest representation of my perspective, which I've substantiated with my own experience, knowledge, and logic. Where I take issue is that you and one or two others are attempting to speak on said achievement when you ostensibly have no experience, factual evidence, or convincing reasoning to legitimize anything you're saying. You can't say you know what it's like to get to legend bc you've never gotten to legend, you can't provide statistics to prove your argument bc they directly contradict it (if legend is so easy how is that only 0.1 percent of the player base is there?), and the best rationale you could up with to support your argument is "I saw some players in legend on streams and I didn't think they were good". In sum, you have no experience, you have no evidence, and your logic is weak and predicated solely on your opinion. I'm sorry if you can't understand everything that I'm saying, but I hope the main theme of it comes across here.
Presumption is guessing for others or?
Than sorry, i really felt like you i hit you somewhere where it hurt, which i definitely didn't aim. Like i want just argue about why i have my opinion on this theme like this...
But, there is no value in arguing by "You can't prove i am wrong!", when you can't prove you are right either. Or how is your experience more valuable than my? Are you better human? I don't get it. (Or do you want say. Living here where i live is definitely good place to live. Why? Becose i live here. And you will never prove me wrong. Muhahaha!!!Or at least this is how i picture you.:-D)
And yes it is my best argument, as videos of actual misstakes are better proof than... Huh, could there be better evidence?
This is kind of a pointless argument at this stage, and it kinda feels like you're trolling tbh. I've demonstrated multiple times at length why my argument is superior to yours. My experience is more relevant than yours bc I have it firsthand (meaning I've been thru the grind to get legend and you haven't) and you don't. If you can't understand this extremely simple principle then, again, there's no reason to continue this conversation. I acknowledge it may be a language issue, but what I'm saying is not difficult to understand. My logic is superior to yours bc it's based on actual empirical evidence (read: statistics), common sense, and the direct experience I just mentioned, whereas yours is based on what you think and literally nothing else. If you can't understand what I mean than I suggest you refrain from posting further until you learn better English or, if that isn't the issue, learn how to understand information.
Videos in which people make mistakes means absolutely nothing BTW, lol, and I already addressed this in a prior comment. Every single person that has ever played HS has made mistakes, legend players are no exception to that rule. This is not "evidence" that legend is easy to achieve, it's evidence that they play the game.
It is hard to not troll, when you basicaly helping more and more. For example you can look on bold ones in your last message. I really don't see anything superior on your arguments. It is just ridiculusly funny how you can't understand how much proud person you are.:-D
he has mental problems fam , leave him alone in his little hearthstone universe :D
Ad hominem bc you got shut down the last time you tried to post on here and now you have to resort to trolling. Classic response from idiots that know they lost an argument but don't want to admit that they made a complete fool out of themselves, lol.
ok you won dude , at least I can make you happy like that in your troubled life
you think I am dumb enough to waste time arguing with you? you expecting me to write long posts with bold lines there and there for mentally ill person ?
you have to stop playing this shit man, I am serious
or you will still dream about everyday being rank 1 legend or beating famous hs player and wake up with sleep orgasm
don't expect me to write again :)
or expect and declare yourself as "winner" idc, maybe makes your day
Ad hominem bc you got shut down the last time you tried to post on here and now you have to resort to trolling. Classic response from idiots that know they lost an argument but don't want to admit that they made a complete fool out of themselves, lol.
ok you won dude , at least I can make you happy like that in your troubled life
you think I am dumb enough to waste time arguing with you? you expecting me to write long posts with bold lines there and there for mentally ill person ?
you have to stop playing this shit man, I am serious
or you will still dream about everyday being rank 1 legend or beating famous hs player and wake up with sleep orgasm
don't expect me to write again :)
or expect and declare yourself as "winner" idc, maybe makes your day
I hope you are just a kid, would explain a lot
Salty bc you made a complete fool out of yourself, can't come up with a decent counterargument bc you know you have no credibility, and ultimately just got pooped on, so you call me mentally ill and say I have a troubled life, LOL. Really sad and desperate, but I guess you can't expect anything more from someone that knows they look like an idiot and needs to get some feeling of petty retribution against the person that exposed them. You brought this on yourself man, no one forced you to post an extremely unqualified opinion on a thread and then consequently attempt to defend this opinion by talking shit instead of coming up with a legitimate rebuttal. I hope you learned something from this man, I really do.
To everyone else reading this thread attempting to gain some genuine insight into the question asked by the OP, I apologize for derailing the thread somewhat with this drama. Hopefully it will return to people (hopefully somewhat qualified to actually speak on this) providing their perspectives on the original question.
Good grief. Again, my argument, which consists of me making the point that legend requires skill, time, and dedication to achieve, does not make presumptions. Me presuming that you and elnur are lower ranked has no direct correlation to aforementioned argument, it's just an off the cuff observation that I'm making bc both of you seem like you don't know what you're talking about. As for your feeling that you would mop the floor with legend players in arena, you're certainly entitled to feel however you like. That doesn't mean your feeling is even remotely realistic/true tho. The primary problem I see with your argument is that you're not couching anything you're saying in logic or rationale or experience. You're just saying you think and feel stuff, but you can't back any of it up. Plenty of people make mistakes sure, you see it all the time at high rank. What separates the best players from very good or average players is that they make less mistakes on average: they are more consistent. Also, you took my assertion of you saying "any legend player [could be] mediocre" out of context, and it doesn't misinterpret your argument at all. You said legend players "can even be pretty mediocre". That's a direct quote. I said it's difficult to make the case that any legend players are mediocre bc they are the top 0.1 percent of all players. No contradiction or presumption there.
I would react untraditional from end to start...
Ok we can assume i maid presumption and you maid presumption. Than i just ask, why the hell are you react on something out of context. Or why else would you argument... On my "legends can be mediocre players" by answering "all legends can't be mediocre". Becose i was presumptional only becosei thought it was reaction to context and not some random sentence just to write at least something close to the theme. (Like hey, global warming can cause lost of house to sea... Yeah? But people in Tibet are pretty safe.)
Nevermore... pointless to prolonging who is presumptional.
And to the point...
Everybody base on feeling, nobody have hardproof data of how much people in legend are people without misstakes, with few misstakes, with lots of misstakes... SO there definitely is not way to base information on other basis then are our feels/knowledge. And each of us would have different feels/knowledge, becose we all live different lives.
For me it more like... I was once legends and it was so hard for me, pleas stop letting fown value of my achievment. Man, it doesn't matter how others looks on it, if you feel like it was achievment, then it was achievment for you. For me is for example achievment which i am proud of beating Rastakhan Rumble with hunter overkill cost reduce, even if nobody else five it value.
So now i am maybe presumptional, but ve honest to yourself... When you wrote "That doesn't mean your feeling is even remotely realistic/true tho." didn't you in real just completly denied my idea about how being legend does not neccesery mean you should be proud of your game skill in HS? And it is about everything what i wrote... If you want just completly denny all what i write you definetly can. But please stop transform meaning of words back in time... Like hey i didn't meaned it like absolutly denny. It should be more like... You are not close, becose it is something and it will be something. Which i would agree it is something. Not everybody have legend. But i still say on the same time... That this something mean almost same to nothing if its primary meaning you are skillfull master in game is almost nonexistent.
Ok, this is clearly a language barrier issue. You don't know what I mean when I say you took something out of context and you may not know what presumption means. To be honest I'm not entirely sure what you're attempting to say in general with this last post, but I do want to say a few things to try to address what I think you're saying. To start with, this is not personal to me. The points I've made thus far were not made to attempt to defend myself or what an achievement in a game means to me. I don't need to validate what achieving legend means to you. What I've said is an honest representation of my perspective, which I've substantiated with my own experience, knowledge, and logic. Where I take issue is that you and one or two others are attempting to speak on said achievement when you ostensibly have no experience, factual evidence, or convincing reasoning to legitimize anything you're saying. You can't say you know what it's like to get to legend bc you've never gotten to legend, you can't provide statistics to prove your argument bc they directly contradict it (if legend is so easy how is that only 0.1 percent of the player base is there?), and the best rationale you could up with to support your argument is "I saw some players in legend on streams and I didn't think they were good". In sum, you have no experience, you have no evidence, and your logic is weak and predicated solely on your opinion. I'm sorry if you can't understand everything that I'm saying, but I hope the main theme of it comes across here.
Presumption is guessing for others or?
Than sorry, i really felt like you i hit you somewhere where it hurt, which i definitely didn't aim. Like i want just argue about why i have my opinion on this theme like this...
But, there is no value in arguing by "You can't prove i am wrong!", when you can't prove you are right either. Or how is your experience more valuable than my? Are you better human? I don't get it. (Or do you want say. Living here where i live is definitely good place to live. Why? Becose i live here. And you will never prove me wrong. Muhahaha!!!Or at least this is how i picture you.:-D)
And yes it is my best argument, as videos of actual misstakes are better proof than... Huh, could there be better evidence?
This is kind of a pointless argument at this stage, and it kinda feels like you're trolling tbh. I've demonstrated multiple times at length why my argument is superior to yours. My experience is more relevant than yours bc I have it firsthand (meaning I've been thru the grind to get legend and you haven't) and you don't. If you can't understand this extremely simple principle then, again, there's no reason to continue this conversation. I acknowledge it may be a language issue, but what I'm saying is not difficult to understand. My logic is superior to yours bc it's based on actual empirical evidence (read: statistics), common sense, and the direct experience I just mentioned, whereas yours is based on what you think and literally nothing else. If you can't understand what I mean than I suggest you refrain from posting further until you learn better English or, if that isn't the issue, learn how to understand information.
Videos in which people make mistakes means absolutely nothing BTW, lol, and I already addressed this in a prior comment. Every single person that has ever played HS has made mistakes, legend players are no exception to that rule. This is not "evidence" that legend is easy to achieve, it's evidence that they play the game.
It is hard to not troll, when you basicaly helping more and more. For example you can look on bold ones in your last message. I really don't see anything superior on your arguments. It is just ridiculusly funny how you can't understand how much proud person you are.:-D
he has mental problems fam , leave him alone in his little hearthstone universe :D
Hey, i already left him. It is not fun, when he don't even need my push anymore.
Hey, i already left him. It is not fun, when he don't even need my push anymore.
Ok little buddy, run along now. Maybe you and elnur can start a clown thread together where you talk about all the times you tried to pretend you knew something about a topic, got called out on it, lost all credibility, and then tried to save face by acting as if you were trolling the whole time. I'm sure that would be very entertaining, lol
There is a difference between a consistent rank 5-2 player and legend - not much but it is there. For a long time I couldn't get past rank 2, but after making adjustments to my mindset and trying a few different things I finally hit legend a few times, and I know I can do it if I want to - it just depends on how much effort and time I feel like putting in in a month.
Time. Time playing the schizophrenic laddering system that hands you large win and loss rates playing the same deck. To me, that’s the most frustrating part and why making legend is nothing more than a time sink.
Since this thread has apparently just dissolved into a shouting match and it doesn't appear that the original poster is even involved in the discussion after his initial post, I'm going to go ahead and close this here.
I suggest those involved in the tit-for-tat over the last few pages take a breath and cool off, please. Thanks!
You know what, fair enough. My bad for taking you seriously, clearly you're just an idiot lol.
he has mental problems fam , leave him alone in his little hearthstone universe :D
Ad hominem bc you got shut down the last time you tried to post on here and now you have to resort to trolling. Classic response from idiots that know they lost an argument but don't want to admit that they made a complete fool out of themselves, lol.
ok you won dude , at least I can make you happy like that in your troubled life
you think I am dumb enough to waste time arguing with you? you expecting me to write long posts with bold lines there and there for mentally ill person ?
you have to stop playing this shit man, I am serious
or you will still dream about everyday being rank 1 legend or beating famous hs player and wake up with sleep orgasm
don't expect me to write again :)
or expect and declare yourself as "winner" idc, maybe makes your day
I hope you are just a kid, would explain a lot
Salty bc you made a complete fool out of yourself, can't come up with a decent counterargument bc you know you have no credibility, and ultimately just got pooped on, so you call me mentally ill and say I have a troubled life, LOL. Really sad and desperate, but I guess you can't expect anything more from someone that knows they look like an idiot and needs to get some feeling of petty retribution against the person that exposed them. You brought this on yourself man, no one forced you to post an extremely unqualified opinion on a thread and then consequently attempt to defend this opinion by talking shit instead of coming up with a legitimate rebuttal. I hope you learned something from this man, I really do.
To everyone else reading this thread attempting to gain some genuine insight into the question asked by the OP, I apologize for derailing the thread somewhat with this drama. Hopefully it will return to people (hopefully somewhat qualified to actually speak on this) providing their perspectives on the original question.
Hey, i already left him. It is not fun, when he don't even need my push anymore.
Ok little buddy, run along now. Maybe you and elnur can start a clown thread together where you talk about all the times you tried to pretend you knew something about a topic, got called out on it, lost all credibility, and then tried to save face by acting as if you were trolling the whole time. I'm sure that would be very entertaining, lol
There is a difference between a consistent rank 5-2 player and legend - not much but it is there. For a long time I couldn't get past rank 2, but after making adjustments to my mindset and trying a few different things I finally hit legend a few times, and I know I can do it if I want to - it just depends on how much effort and time I feel like putting in in a month.
Time. Time playing the schizophrenic laddering system that hands you large win and loss rates playing the same deck. To me, that’s the most frustrating part and why making legend is nothing more than a time sink.
Since this thread has apparently just dissolved into a shouting match and it doesn't appear that the original poster is even involved in the discussion after his initial post, I'm going to go ahead and close this here.
I suggest those involved in the tit-for-tat over the last few pages take a breath and cool off, please.
Thanks!
Closed.