Seriously... May I ask what is the purpose of this thread other than bragging for something insignificant??? Is this really about how good is Voidlord??? Because it's too late to discuss such a thing. Everyone knows already how good this card is... -.-
I perfectly know this is another poor attempt of trying to fool people, OP. It's pretty obvious you don't play enough Hearthstone and you are only here to show us statistics from HSReplay.net. But c'mon, you can do it better, my friend, and really, there is no need to be ashamed. You shouldn't be trying to hide your true nature. Showing statistics from time to time is perfectly fine for the forum, because it helps to keep it alive and not many people out there do it. ;)
Good luck and keep doing your work as usual without having to resort to stuff like this, dude. This is just an advice I really wanted to give you, hope you follow it. See you later!!! :) :) :)
Which deck takes more skill to play? The one where it takes no skill to plop out Voidcaller into Voidlord, or the one that has to make every perfect play and maximize all damage to have a chance at finding lethal vs. a terrible matchup?
Control vs. control = takes skill
Control vs. aggro = no skill, easy win
I have no dog in this fight, but I will admit the reason I don't play *much* control is because I hate long mirror matches. Unless it's the stupid Wild paladins, I find that most aggro decks take plenty of skill to play; however, I play mostly mostly for memes these days (and arena) and have avoided the grind to rank 5 for most of 2019.
Anything that punishes degenerate agro players is A-OK in my book!
I hate that we have this moral dilemma where control is considered virtuous to play while aggro is considered a sinful crime, like its a card game, a card game NEEDS to have multiple deck types viable for it to be healthy. There's nothing ethical about playing a slow deck and there's nothing evil about playing a fast deck.
Anything that punishes degenerate agro players is A-OK in my book!
I hate that we have this moral dilemma where control is considered virtuous to play while aggro is considered a sinful crime, like its a card game, a card game NEEDS to have multiple deck types viable for it to be healthy. There's nothing ethical about playing a slow deck and there's nothing evil about playing a fast deck.
Please, do not tell me you really feel insulted by some people on the internet just because they say/think it's kinda "evil" and "unethical" to play aggro decks... -.-
Which deck takes more skill to play? The one where it takes no skill to plop out Voidcaller into Voidlord, or the one that has to make every perfect play and maximize all damage to have a chance at finding lethal vs. a terrible matchup?
Control vs. control = takes skill
Control vs. aggro = no skill, easy win
Let's take control warrior vs control warrior. Does it really take skill or rely heavily on RNG? Let's say player 1 has Dr Boom in his opening hand and player 2 has Dr Boom at the bottom of his deck. Who wins? Let's say both players Dr. Boom on curve. Player 1 gets the "discover a mech" hero power twice as much as player 2. Who is most likely to win? Let's say player 1 gets 6 good mechs from omega assembly while player 2 gets 6 terrible ones. Who is most likely to win?
If you ask me control warrior vs control warrior depends a lot on RNG. While aggro vs aggro is the actual winner when it comes to showcasing skills. One bad trade and you might not be able to regain the board, go face at the wrong time and lose etc.. In the control mirror you can make multiple mistakes because you can recover with board clears.
Control (Warrior) is like Chess - using your given resources wisely.
Aggro is like Russian Roulette - Hope to topdeck the right card/ hope for the opponent to topdeck the wrong card.
Parallels to the IQ of the players of both games are, of course, coincidental.
I disagree with this.
Control warrior is nothing but removal. It's simply a matter of playing it. Saying that you have to use your ressources wisely is, to me at least, redundant when roughly 50 % of the deck is removal and the rest is either taunts or armor gain. How can that require anymore IQ than aggro decks?
Playing aggro is more about managing your ressources: when to trade, go face, when to add more pressure and when to hold back so you have a chance to recover, calculate damage over turns, playing your outs etc. To me that requires more IQ than: "Oh my opponent has something on the board. Should I remove it? Ah... tough one. Okay, I am going to removei it".
I hate to make this disclaimer but I know what's coming my why it I don't write it. I have over a 1100 wins with Priest where I played almost every possible control deck Priest has to offer. I loved the good old control warrior back when Justicar Trueheart was a part of the deck. But I also like every other aspect of Hearthstone: Aggro, combo, meme, control etc., so don't bother with the: "oh look whiny aggro player" argument. Cheers!
Anything that punishes degenerate agro players is A-OK in my book!
I hate that we have this moral dilemma where control is considered virtuous to play while aggro is considered a sinful crime, like its a card game, a card game NEEDS to have multiple deck types viable for it to be healthy. There's nothing ethical about playing a slow deck and there's nothing evil about playing a fast deck.
Please, do not tell me you really feel insulted by some people on the internet just because they say/think it's kinda "evil" and "unethical" to play aggro decks... -.-
It’s insane how you read his comment and come to the conclusion he felt insulted. LMFAO
Anything that punishes degenerate agro players is A-OK in my book!
I hate that we have this moral dilemma where control is considered virtuous to play while aggro is considered a sinful crime, like its a card game, a card game NEEDS to have multiple deck types viable for it to be healthy. There's nothing ethical about playing a slow deck and there's nothing evil about playing a fast deck.
Please, do not tell me you really feel insulted by some people on the internet just because they say/think it's kinda "evil" and "unethical" to play aggro decks... -.-
It’s insane how you read his comment and come to the conclusion he felt insulted. LMFAO
"Insane"? Seriously? C'mon, dude, you don't need to overreact that much to try to prove me wrong, hehe. XD
Please, be gentle and enlight me, I wanna know the truth!!! :D
IMO void Lord and obsidian statue are among the most cancerous cards ever printed. As for skill I would say
Aggro v aggro can be among the highest skill matchups and can just be strait no skill depending on the decks.
Mid-range and combo are almost always pretty skill intensive unless something is just strait-up broken (ie og mid range shaman, og ak47druid, snip snap warlock, og secret paladin)
Aggro v control = who draws there good cards first
Control v control is often high skill, but may also just come down to one tech card or who played there dk first.
This myth that aggro is somehow low skill has always ground my gears just because a lot of casual players play aggro because they are budget and f2p friendly, and control players are going to lose a matchup that was inherently a bad matchup for the archetype regardless of skill.
Anything that punishes degenerate agro players is A-OK in my book!
I hate that we have this moral dilemma where control is considered virtuous to play while aggro is considered a sinful crime, like its a card game, a card game NEEDS to have multiple deck types viable for it to be healthy. There's nothing ethical about playing a slow deck and there's nothing evil about playing a fast deck.
Please, do not tell me you really feel insulted by some people on the internet just because they say/think it's kinda "evil" and "unethical" to play aggro decks... -.-
It’s insane how you read his comment and come to the conclusion he felt insulted. LMFAO
"Insane"? Seriously? C'mon, dude, you don't need to overreact that much to try to prove me wrong, hehe. XD
Please, be gentle and enlight me, I wanna know the truth!!! :D
To me it is kind of insane how people read the craziest and „way out of context“ things in comments from other people. This time I agree it’s not that „insane“ but still I guess you get me.
For example using the term „insane“ and calling it an overreact. We both have different opinions on the word used in HS forum as it seems.
have a nice day. Btw the truth I cannot give you. Only this other guy can
Anything that punishes degenerate agro players is A-OK in my book!
I hate that we have this moral dilemma where control is considered virtuous to play while aggro is considered a sinful crime, like its a card game, a card game NEEDS to have multiple deck types viable for it to be healthy. There's nothing ethical about playing a slow deck and there's nothing evil about playing a fast deck.
Please, do not tell me you really feel insulted by some people on the internet just because they say/think it's kinda "evil" and "unethical" to play aggro decks... -.-
It’s insane how you read his comment and come to the conclusion he felt insulted. LMFAO
"Insane"? Seriously? C'mon, dude, you don't need to overreact that much to try to prove me wrong, hehe. XD
Please, be gentle and enlight me, I wanna know the truth!!! :D
To me it is kind of insane how people read the craziest and „way out of context“ things in comments from other people. This time I agree it’s not that „insane“ but still I guess you get me.
For example using the term „insane“ and calling it an overreact. We both have different opinions on the word used in HS forum as it seems.
have a nice day. Btw the truth I cannot give you. Only this other guy can
See, you can act as a gentleman, be more kind and say the same thing just by using different words. :)
Go in peace, my dear friend, I'm pretty sure we will chat again in the future!!! :D
When you guys play sense demons into voidcaller into voidlord. aggro players quit right away :D :D . they cant breach the big wall :D
Voidlord greatest taunt of all time.
DARKNESS RISES
clap clap low IQ deck showcase...next.
Seriously... May I ask what is the purpose of this thread other than bragging for something insignificant??? Is this really about how good is Voidlord??? Because it's too late to discuss such a thing. Everyone knows already how good this card is... -.-
Anything that punishes degenerate agro players is A-OK in my book!
Keep Calm and RAG FACE
I perfectly know this is another poor attempt of trying to fool people, OP. It's pretty obvious you don't play enough Hearthstone and you are only here to show us statistics from HSReplay.net. But c'mon, you can do it better, my friend, and really, there is no need to be ashamed. You shouldn't be trying to hide your true nature. Showing statistics from time to time is perfectly fine for the forum, because it helps to keep it alive and not many people out there do it. ;)
Good luck and keep doing your work as usual without having to resort to stuff like this, dude. This is just an advice I really wanted to give you, hope you follow it. See you later!!! :) :) :)
This thread is so 2017...
Out of curiosity: How is aggro anymore degenerate than e.g. control warrior?
Control (Warrior) is like Chess - using your given resources wisely.
Aggro is like Russian Roulette - Hope to topdeck the right card/ hope for the opponent to topdeck the wrong card.
Parallels to the IQ of the players of both games are, of course, coincidental.
Control is like Chess - using your given resources wisely.
Aggro is like Russian Roulette - Hope to topdeck the right card/ hope for the opponent to topdeck the wrong card.
Parallels to the IQ of the players of both games are, of course, coincidental ;)
Which deck takes more skill to play? The one where it takes no skill to plop out Voidcaller into Voidlord, or the one that has to make every perfect play and maximize all damage to have a chance at finding lethal vs. a terrible matchup?
Control vs. control = takes skill
Control vs. aggro = no skill, easy win
I have no dog in this fight, but I will admit the reason I don't play *much* control is because I hate long mirror matches. Unless it's the stupid Wild paladins, I find that most aggro decks take plenty of skill to play; however, I play mostly mostly for memes these days (and arena) and have avoided the grind to rank 5 for most of 2019.
I hate that we have this moral dilemma where control is considered virtuous to play while aggro is considered a sinful crime, like its a card game, a card game NEEDS to have multiple deck types viable for it to be healthy. There's nothing ethical about playing a slow deck and there's nothing evil about playing a fast deck.
Well if you got to turn 9 vs an aggro deck you probably win anyway so..
Please, do not tell me you really feel insulted by some people on the internet just because they say/think it's kinda "evil" and "unethical" to play aggro decks... -.-
Aggro = cancer garbage. I'm with you. Praise taunts, praise heal, praise aoe.
I'm sorry for my bad english :D
Let's take control warrior vs control warrior. Does it really take skill or rely heavily on RNG?
Let's say player 1 has Dr Boom in his opening hand and player 2 has Dr Boom at the bottom of his deck. Who wins?
Let's say both players Dr. Boom on curve. Player 1 gets the "discover a mech" hero power twice as much as player 2. Who is most likely to win?
Let's say player 1 gets 6 good mechs from omega assembly while player 2 gets 6 terrible ones. Who is most likely to win?
If you ask me control warrior vs control warrior depends a lot on RNG. While aggro vs aggro is the actual winner when it comes to showcasing skills. One bad trade and you might not be able to regain the board, go face at the wrong time and lose etc.. In the control mirror you can make multiple mistakes because you can recover with board clears.
I disagree with this.
Control warrior is nothing but removal. It's simply a matter of playing it. Saying that you have to use your ressources wisely is, to me at least, redundant when roughly 50 % of the deck is removal and the rest is either taunts or armor gain. How can that require anymore IQ than aggro decks?
Playing aggro is more about managing your ressources: when to trade, go face, when to add more pressure and when to hold back so you have a chance to recover, calculate damage over turns, playing your outs etc. To me that requires more IQ than: "Oh my opponent has something on the board. Should I remove it? Ah... tough one. Okay, I am going to removei it".
I hate to make this disclaimer but I know what's coming my why it I don't write it. I have over a 1100 wins with Priest where I played almost every possible control deck Priest has to offer. I loved the good old control warrior back when Justicar Trueheart was a part of the deck. But I also like every other aspect of Hearthstone: Aggro, combo, meme, control etc., so don't bother with the: "oh look whiny aggro player" argument. Cheers!
It’s insane how you read his comment and come to the conclusion he felt insulted. LMFAO
"Insane"? Seriously? C'mon, dude, you don't need to overreact that much to try to prove me wrong, hehe. XD
Please, be gentle and enlight me, I wanna know the truth!!! :D
IMO void Lord and obsidian statue are among the most cancerous cards ever printed. As for skill I would say
Aggro v aggro can be among the highest skill matchups and can just be strait no skill depending on the decks.
Mid-range and combo are almost always pretty skill intensive unless something is just strait-up broken (ie og mid range shaman, og ak47druid, snip snap warlock, og secret paladin)
Aggro v control = who draws there good cards first
Control v control is often high skill, but may also just come down to one tech card or who played there dk first.
This myth that aggro is somehow low skill has always ground my gears just because a lot of casual players play aggro because they are budget and f2p friendly, and control players are going to lose a matchup that was inherently a bad matchup for the archetype regardless of skill.
To me it is kind of insane how people read the craziest and „way out of context“ things in comments from other people. This time I agree it’s not that „insane“ but still I guess you get me.
For example using the term „insane“ and calling it an overreact. We both have different opinions on the word used in HS forum as it seems.
have a nice day. Btw the truth I cannot give you. Only this other guy can
See, you can act as a gentleman, be more kind and say the same thing just by using different words. :)
Go in peace, my dear friend, I'm pretty sure we will chat again in the future!!! :D
I wonder how many people here taking dumps on aggro decks actually ever hit legend, or got even close to it.
The OP obviously floats around rank 15.