I don't want to derail this thread too much, but...
Are they, though? They're definitely all fine. But they seem to be bouncing around in that second group of decks. According to the last VS report (which admittedly was pre-nerf), those decks all still have unfavorables against the control warrior. And based on what I saw happen at GM this weekend, that still seems to be the case. I guess we'll know when we have better numbers on thursday.
Control Warrior is good against Quest Shaman and Murloc Pally but not against Quest Druid. Quest Druid with Nomi/Maly, Elise and Floop stomps on CW, only bomb warrior can hope to beat Quest Druid. Aggro Priest is slightly unfavoured against Shaman, crushes Druid and is reasonable against everything else.
Control Warrior is good against Quest Shaman and Murloc Pally but not against Quest Druid. Quest Druid with Nomi/Maly, Elise and Floop stomps on CW, only bomb warrior can hope to beat Quest Druid. Aggro Priest is slightly unfavoured against Shaman, crushes Druid and is reasonable against everything else.
I would disagree with a lot of this. Again, not as to derail this thread, we'll know more on Thursday.
Yes because we all are capable of crafting whatever cards, that are potentially garbage, whenever just to see if a deck is ‘good’ or not. And asking your fellow community members is pointless and a waste of everyones time and attention.
I tried both version of Midrange and Aggro Highlander Paladin that I build, and the winrate is around 50%. These deck doesn't have any tempo play bar Zephrys, and Finley is the worst highlander legendary (useless in late game). Once you fail behind on board, you lose.
It rely too much on matchup and topdeck, so I understand that someone can have a lucky winstreak, but otherwise Paladin doesn't have a lot of good card class that fit in this kind of archetype. Maybe next expansion ?
when ppl get to legend it's common to goof off and play whatever decks because you have nothing to lose. trump was vs. many meme decks on the ladder to begin with. he even made a comment like "an alternate reality where everyone in top legends is playing arena decks"
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Control Warrior is good against Quest Shaman and Murloc Pally but not against Quest Druid. Quest Druid with Nomi/Maly, Elise and Floop stomps on CW, only bomb warrior can hope to beat Quest Druid. Aggro Priest is slightly unfavoured against Shaman, crushes Druid and is reasonable against everything else.
I would disagree with a lot of this. Again, not as to derail this thread, we'll know more on Thursday.
imagine playing a deck made by Trump, the trade master and card review god
Yes because we all are capable of crafting whatever cards, that are potentially garbage, whenever just to see if a deck is ‘good’ or not. And asking your fellow community members is pointless and a waste of everyones time and attention.
I tried both version of Midrange and Aggro Highlander Paladin that I build, and the winrate is around 50%. These deck doesn't have any tempo play bar Zephrys, and Finley is the worst highlander legendary (useless in late game). Once you fail behind on board, you lose.
It rely too much on matchup and topdeck, so I understand that someone can have a lucky winstreak, but otherwise Paladin doesn't have a lot of good card class that fit in this kind of archetype. Maybe next expansion ?
when ppl get to legend it's common to goof off and play whatever decks because you have nothing to lose. trump was vs. many meme decks on the ladder to begin with. he even made a comment like "an alternate reality where everyone in top legends is playing arena decks"