Complains or no complains, we are getting a whole forking pile of dragons yeeey!
Yaaaay! I'm pretty glad with it too. Awesome theme in the most power-creeped expansion.
well, I guess if the full dragon expansion wasn't OPOP af then people would complain about the purpose of it
imagine you'd get all dem dragons and you couldn't play any of them
saying this, good thing it's the last one in a year, we can expect to see this exp creating the meta(which it will most likely do) only for the next 15 months and not whole 2 years if it was the first one
We've been down this dead-end road enough times already. The name of the year has no bearing on what cards are created within that year. As others have stated, it is instead an indicator of the theme for the year and as such, thematic cards are produced that tie in with it.
Doesn't matter.
If they had year of the Murloc and no Murlocs it would still be a let down to lots of players. Year of the Dragon is turning out to be a missed opportunity. How can you not see this?
i didnt' see you complaining about there being no Mammoths on the year of the mammoths, you should know better by now.
We've been down this dead-end road enough times already. The name of the year has no bearing on what cards are created within that year. As others have stated, it is instead an indicator of the theme for the year and as such, thematic cards are produced that tie in with it.
Doesn't matter.
If they had year of the Murloc and no Murlocs it would still be a let down to lots of players. Year of the Dragon is turning out to be a missed opportunity. How can you not see this?
i didnt' see you complaining about there being no Mammoths on the year of the mammoths, you should know better by now.
Eat it
Nothing that was previously said was incorrect, as far as I can see. Not sure what you are asking people to "eat"...
Nu nu nu nu, "there will be no Dragons in year of the Dragon" next expansion FUCKING DESCENT OF THE MOTHERFUCKING DRAGONS
Man, I was expecting to come here too just to yell this!
Where in his comment does it imply that he's mad? You're strongly misinterpreting.
Ok, dude, I don't have enough evidence that Symon22 was mad, but he was definitely making fun of people who said there will be no dragons in the year of the dragon. He created an account just to say that, which is weird to say the least, don't you think so? Just because some people are wrong about something, such a thing is no reason for others to make fun of them. ;)
Ok, dude, I don't have enough evidence that Symon22 was mad, but he was definitely making fun of people who said there will be no dragons in the year of the dragon. He created an account just to say that, which is weird to say the least, don't you think so? Just because some people are wrong about something, such a thing is no reason for others to make fun of them. ;)
Let's keep things civil in the forum. Thank you.
Except no one on either side was technically wrong.
Some people wanted to see dragons during the Year of the Dragon (understandable), and others pointed out that, according to precedent, there was no real reason to expect dragons or be mad about it if they never showed up (completely true).
However, the people making fun are NOW wrong, because no one is actually upset that there are dragons, and no one ever said it was impossible.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"Why, you never expected justice from a company, did you? They have neither a soul to lose nor a body to kick." -- Lady Saba Holland
We've been down this dead-end road enough times already. The name of the year has no bearing on what cards are created within that year. As others have stated, it is instead an indicator of the theme for the year and as such, thematic cards are produced that tie in with it.
Doesn't matter.
If they had year of the Murloc and no Murlocs it would still be a let down to lots of players. Year of the Dragon is turning out to be a missed opportunity. How can you not see this?
i didnt' see you complaining about there being no Mammoths on the year of the mammoths, you should know better by now.
Eat it
Nothing that was previously said was incorrect, as far as I can see. Not sure what you are asking people to "eat"...
Except no one on either side was technically wrong.
Yeah, dude... Whatever... I know this may sound super weird to some of you, but who the hell cares who is right and who is not, especially in this case? The only thing that matters here is the fact some people are trying to hurt others feelings, that's all.
We've been down this dead-end road enough times already. The name of the year has no bearing on what cards are created within that year. As others have stated, it is instead an indicator of the theme for the year and as such, thematic cards are produced that tie in with it.
Doesn't matter.
If they had year of the Murloc and no Murlocs it would still be a let down to lots of players. Year of the Dragon is turning out to be a missed opportunity. How can you not see this?
i didnt' see you complaining about there being no Mammoths on the year of the mammoths, you should know better by now.
Eat it
Nothing that was previously said was incorrect, as far as I can see. Not sure what you are asking people to "eat"...
Except no one on either side was technically wrong.
Yeah, dude... Whatever... I know this may sound super weird to some of you, but who the hell cares who is right and who is not, especially in this case? The only thing that matters here is the fact some people are trying to hurt others feelings, that's all.
You just hurt my feelings, Sherman. :-(
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"Why, you never expected justice from a company, did you? They have neither a soul to lose nor a body to kick." -- Lady Saba Holland
Except no one on either side was technically wrong.
Yeah, dude... Whatever... I know this may sound super weird to some of you, but who the hell cares who is right and who is not, especially in this case? The only thing that matters here is the fact some people are trying to hurt others feelings, that's all.
You just hurt my feelings, Sherman. :-(
Damn, dude, I guess you know already that kind of reaction is my f...king weakness and I can't help to feel bad in this situation, because I'm not sure if you're deceving me or not!!! :( Maybe I'm wrong about this, but please, do not try to manipulate me like that... -.-
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Man, I was expecting to come here too just to yell this!
Since you created an account just to post this, may I ask why are you so mad at people for being wrong about a topic like this one?
Haha lovely how this year turned out, right?
Complains or no complains, we are getting a whole forking pile of dragons yeeey!
Not a salty note to make, friend. It's just for fun, not to offend anyone.
Yaaaay! I'm pretty glad with it too. Awesome theme in the most power-creeped expansion.
well, I guess if the full dragon expansion wasn't OPOP af then people would complain about the purpose of it
imagine you'd get all dem dragons and you couldn't play any of them
saying this, good thing it's the last one in a year, we can expect to see this exp creating the meta(which it will most likely do) only for the next 15 months and not whole 2 years if it was the first one
Yeah, sure... Whatever you say, bro. ;)
Eat it
Nothing that was previously said was incorrect, as far as I can see.
Not sure what you are asking people to "eat"...
Where in his comment does it imply that he's mad? You're strongly misinterpreting.
Ok, dude, I don't have enough evidence that Symon22 was mad, but he was definitely making fun of people who said there will be no dragons in the year of the dragon. He created an account just to say that, which is weird to say the least, don't you think so? Just because some people are wrong about something, such a thing is no reason for others to make fun of them. ;)
Let's keep things civil in the forum. Thank you.
Except no one on either side was technically wrong.
Some people wanted to see dragons during the Year of the Dragon (understandable), and others pointed out that, according to precedent, there was no real reason to expect dragons or be mad about it if they never showed up (completely true).
However, the people making fun are NOW wrong, because no one is actually upset that there are dragons, and no one ever said it was impossible.
"Why, you never expected justice from a company, did you? They have neither a soul to lose nor a body to kick." -- Lady Saba Holland
Eat your words. That better?
Yeah, dude... Whatever... I know this may sound super weird to some of you, but who the hell cares who is right and who is not, especially in this case? The only thing that matters here is the fact some people are trying to hurt others feelings, that's all.
Nope. Still doesn't make sense. :-)
You just hurt my feelings, Sherman. :-(
"Why, you never expected justice from a company, did you? They have neither a soul to lose nor a body to kick." -- Lady Saba Holland
Damn, dude, I guess you know already that kind of reaction is my f...king weakness and I can't help to feel bad in this situation, because I'm not sure if you're deceving me or not!!! :( Maybe I'm wrong about this, but please, do not try to manipulate me like that... -.-