... I don't think the game needs this. As many users already mentioned it, Control "Value" games are meant to be long, and this "Draw" option only applies to Control decks, aggro decks always win/loose early and midrange decks a bit later, but this would not affect them, also Combo decks would not be affected because they either get the combo or not :)
So sadly, this cool idea makes no sense, so will never exist...
I would suggest you to remove Elisia and add MechaThun and instead of the bounce effect a Galvanizer... you are always gonna have 10+ armor as a control warrior, so you can just win these slow matchups with a shieldslam. Also with Doctor Boom's rush you don't always need the 10 armor, and a 10/10 rush can be useful against other decks too.
Everyone giving him shit really should stop and realize that
1) it's Just and idea,it's not like he says this Needs to exist
2)his idea involved asking the other pleyer for a draw and only if BOTH agree then It's a draw
I personally would never accept because i'm a stupid piece of shit and i do whatever i can to make the games i play last as Long as possibile whether i win or lose and if you don't like It....well there's a button in the bottom right that serves exactly that purpose but i do understand where he Is coming from and i don't think an idea like that would be harmful for the game in any way
i don't think an idea like that would be harmful for the game in any way
It doesn't fix the problem, which is that there is a deck in the game for which both players accepting a draw with each other is an outcome they'd be happy with. I'd say that's pretty harmful. I'd much rather they address the issue than work around it.
Having said that, I don't think this is an issue on ladder. So many decks have fairly good matchups against Warrior - they just have abysmal matchups against Rogue. The real issue is tournaments, where bringing Warrior could mean both players stalling each other out several games in a row.
The problem is with Archivist. Just fix the ability to bounce it the same turn you play it and that'll cause the turn limit to be less likely. Still really long games but if you don't like it run mechathun package or just run some big ass shit like fibonacci does.
I get so annoyed with control warriors i've just been playing control shaman and beating them in fatigue fairly easily. It's so boring but I like saying "welcome to my domain" once it's clear i took their ass to value town.
I love seeing Control Warriors playing Elysiana +Brewmaster/Banker crying about other Control Warriors playing Elysiana + Brewmaster/Banker.
If it's not fun for YOU playing the deck and facing it, imagine for all the others.
Even better than when the crying is "He got more value from Dr.Boom than me".
Actually, the 'unfun to play against' argument is a hot steaming pile of you know what.
Never, ever playing a deck has to be fun for your opponents. It has to be fun for YOU. Nobody takes into consideration the opponent's fun when playing a deck, and neither should they.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
It sound a really good idea...
BUT
... I don't think the game needs this. As many users already mentioned it, Control "Value" games are meant to be long, and this "Draw" option only applies to Control decks, aggro decks always win/loose early and midrange decks a bit later, but this would not affect them, also Combo decks would not be affected because they either get the combo or not :)
So sadly, this cool idea makes no sense, so will never exist...
I would suggest you to remove Elisia and add MechaThun and instead of the bounce effect a Galvanizer... you are always gonna have 10+ armor as a control warrior, so you can just win these slow matchups with a shieldslam. Also with Doctor Boom's rush you don't always need the 10 armor, and a 10/10 rush can be useful against other decks too.
The prospect of control warrior mirrors is the main reason why I wont touch the deck. You are welcome to each other.
Everyone giving him shit really should stop and realize that
1) it's Just and idea,it's not like he says this Needs to exist
2)his idea involved asking the other pleyer for a draw and only if BOTH agree then It's a draw
I personally would never accept because i'm a stupid piece of shit and i do whatever i can to make the games i play last as Long as possibile whether i win or lose and if you don't like It....well there's a button in the bottom right that serves exactly that purpose but i do understand where he Is coming from and i don't think an idea like that would be harmful for the game in any way
It doesn't fix the problem, which is that there is a deck in the game for which both players accepting a draw with each other is an outcome they'd be happy with. I'd say that's pretty harmful. I'd much rather they address the issue than work around it.
Having said that, I don't think this is an issue on ladder. So many decks have fairly good matchups against Warrior - they just have abysmal matchups against Rogue. The real issue is tournaments, where bringing Warrior could mean both players stalling each other out several games in a row.
You can find me here! Good luck everyone!
The problem is with Archivist. Just fix the ability to bounce it the same turn you play it and that'll cause the turn limit to be less likely. Still really long games but if you don't like it run mechathun package or just run some big ass shit like fibonacci does.
I get so annoyed with control warriors i've just been playing control shaman and beating them in fatigue fairly easily. It's so boring but I like saying "welcome to my domain" once it's clear i took their ass to value town.
Actually, the 'unfun to play against' argument is a hot steaming pile of you know what.
Never, ever playing a deck has to be fun for your opponents. It has to be fun for YOU. Nobody takes into consideration the opponent's fun when playing a deck, and neither should they.