Seems a bit wonky for some classes. For Shaman, it made me a fully functional Murloc deck, the problem is that when I look at hearthpwn, Murloc shaman has like a win rate of 43%. Shouldn't it have made an elemental deck instead which, afaik, is the best shaman deck right now?
Seems a bit wonky for some classes. For Shaman, it made me a fully functional Murloc deck, the problem is that when I look at hearthpwn, Murloc shaman has like a win rate of 43%. Shouldn't it have made an elemental deck instead which, afaik, is the best shaman deck right now?
Apparently the deckbuilder takes the statistically highest wr deck.
But obviously a weaker deck wich is easier to Pilot can have a better wr at lower ranks than a powerful deck wich is harder to play.
I wonder if the deckbuilder would have created Patronwarrior wich had a 47% wr overall ( if I remember correctly) , but in the hands of a very skilled player it was favored against every other deck in the game.
Worth noting, that deckbuilder gives you a deck from a pool of decks. It could take some tries on certain classes, but you can get various decks each time. Try to autocomplete deck multiple times. In a few tries or so, I managed to get exodia mage, odd mage and big spell mage. (Edit: Tried a couple more, got two secret mages, both were slightly different.)
Just tried a few variations myself. The no-card Shaman created me a Murloc Shaman deck. It was alright - about what you would expect from Murloc Shaman. Then I tried another version adding 2 Unstable Evolutions and then auto completing. This gave me a weird sort of mash up of Elemental and Mechs. It wasn't great tbh. It lost heavily.
I tried a hunter next and from an empty deck it crafted the perfect Spellhunter deck. Won the next few matches with it pretty easily.
I'm itching to try a few other ideas next to see what it comes up with. You seem to get a good archetype if you add one or two specific cards from that usual archetype - such as the UE's as above, etc...
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Seems a bit wonky for some classes. For Shaman, it made me a fully functional Murloc deck, the problem is that when I look at hearthpwn, Murloc shaman has like a win rate of 43%. Shouldn't it have made an elemental deck instead which, afaik, is the best shaman deck right now?
Apparently the deckbuilder takes the statistically highest wr deck.
But obviously a weaker deck wich is easier to Pilot can have a better wr at lower ranks than a powerful deck wich is harder to play.
I wonder if the deckbuilder would have created Patronwarrior wich had a 47% wr overall ( if I remember correctly) , but in the hands of a very skilled player it was favored against every other deck in the game.
I didn't realize that I had a working Even Paladin deck before this.
Worth noting, that deckbuilder gives you a deck from a pool of decks. It could take some tries on certain classes, but you can get various decks each time. Try to autocomplete deck multiple times. In a few tries or so, I managed to get exodia mage, odd mage and big spell mage. (Edit: Tried a couple more, got two secret mages, both were slightly different.)
Just tried a few variations myself.
The no-card Shaman created me a Murloc Shaman deck. It was alright - about what you would expect from Murloc Shaman.
Then I tried another version adding 2 Unstable Evolutions and then auto completing. This gave me a weird sort of mash up of Elemental and Mechs. It wasn't great tbh. It lost heavily.
I tried a hunter next and from an empty deck it crafted the perfect Spellhunter deck. Won the next few matches with it pretty easily.
I'm itching to try a few other ideas next to see what it comes up with. You seem to get a good archetype if you add one or two specific cards from that usual archetype - such as the UE's as above, etc...