I used to be a Blizzard fanboy but the past few years have taugh me otherwise and I started playing their games when they were still called Silicon and Synapse. They are like EA to me now.
Now I just log in once every three days for my dailys, if the last part of the game that I still enjoyed a little bit is now rotten with bots, what's the point of playing? None and it sucks.
I used to be a Blizzard fanboy but the past few years have taugh me otherwise and I started playing their games when they were still called Silicon and Synapse. They are like EA to me now.
Now I just log in once every three days for my dailys, if the last part of the game that I still enjoyed a little bit is now rotten with bots, what's the point of playing? None and it sucks.
Yeah, you are totally right. My apologies. I used to be a Blizzard fanboy like you a long time ago and gladly I'm not one anymore. Now, I'm dedicated to hunting those who were once my brothers, those who were once my comrades. :P
I don't care, "fixing" someone's post is okay when it's a hard fact you're correct. "Fixing" is not okay when it's an opinion. It's saying "your opinion was wrong and here's what you meant to say."
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Life before death. Strength before weakness. Journey before destination.
I don't care, "fixing" someone's post is okay when it's a hard fact you're correct. "Fixing" is not okay when it's an opinion. It's saying "your opinion was wrong and here's what you meant to say."
Again, you miss the point entirely. My post was not telling you that your opinion was wrong. The fact was that your opinion was irrelevant because it could be made about any of the other things that I mentioned in the fixing of your post. Judging by your over-aggressive reaction it simply proves that you care less about the facts of the matter than expecting other people to accept what you say simply because #opinion and you dislike your opinion being challenged in any way.
I don't care, "fixing" someone's post is okay when it's a hard fact you're correct. "Fixing" is not okay when it's an opinion. It's saying "your opinion was wrong and here's what you meant to say."
Again, you miss the point entirely. My post was COMPLETELY WRONG
fixed :)
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Life before death. Strength before weakness. Journey before destination.
I don't care, "fixing" someone's post is okay when it's a hard fact you're correct. "Fixing" is not okay when it's an opinion. It's saying "your opinion was wrong and here's what you meant to say."
Again, you miss the point entirely. My post was COMPLETELY WRONG
fixed :)
You're on a roll! XD
Let's not mention the absolutely hilarious irony that you got your knickers in a twist because someone apparently challenged your opinion, but you're quite happy to challenge someone else's in your next breath.
Rrrrrinnggg!! Oh! There's a phone call for you. It's kettle. Wow. He sounds pissed...! XD
I don't know why this bothers so many people unless they're losing to them.
Bots are against the TOS
Casual is a mode where you should be free to play whatever you want
The existence of these bots at a certain MMR means you cannot just play whatever you want, you instead are forced to play something that beats them AND play the games to completion.
These bots are effectively budget versions of aggro token decks. considering that most people probably play casual to play greedy homebrew decks, it's pretty obvious why a lot of us don't like queueing into them in casual.
Regarding point two and three...
If people, or bots in this case, are free to play whatever they want. Why are they then, not free to play whatever they want (meta decks)?
I don't know why this bothers so many people unless they're losing to them.
Bots are against the TOS
Casual is a mode where you should be free to play whatever you want
The existence of these bots at a certain MMR means you cannot just play whatever you want, you instead are forced to play something that beats them AND play the games to completion.
These bots are effectively budget versions of aggro token decks. considering that most people probably play casual to play greedy homebrew decks, it's pretty obvious why a lot of us don't like queueing into them in casual.
Regarding point two and three...
If people, or bots in this case, are free to play whatever they want. Why are they then, not free to play whatever they want (meta decks)?
Bots are against the TOS. People can play whatever they want within the TOS. I never said that meta decks shouldn't be allowed.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Life before death. Strength before weakness. Journey before destination.
I don't know why this bothers so many people unless they're losing to them.
Bots are against the TOS
Casual is a mode where you should be free to play whatever you want
The existence of these bots at a certain MMR means you cannot just play whatever you want, you instead are forced to play something that beats them AND play the games to completion.
These bots are effectively budget versions of aggro token decks. considering that most people probably play casual to play greedy homebrew decks, it's pretty obvious why a lot of us don't like queueing into them in casual.
Regarding point two and three...
If people, or bots in this case, are free to play whatever they want. Why are they then, not free to play whatever they want (meta decks)?
Bots are against the TOS. People can play whatever they want within the TOS. I never said that meta decks shouldn't be allowed.
But those bots aren't playing anything that's against the TOS. They're not limiting people in what they can play and not. Not in any different way than people do at least. To any other player, they're just another opponent.
Last night I was completing some quests at rank 20 in Wild. I conceded against a bot because I thought he was a new player with only Basic cards and I didn't feel like crushing him.
My next opponent also had a user name made up of random numbers and letters and was likewise playing a Warrior deck made up of entirely Basic cards. After that I just took the wins. I think I saw three different ones like that. It was refreshing not to face Reno Priests and fully-decked Midrange Hunters at Rank 20 for once, but they were obviously bots.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I meant what I fucking said, don't you "fixed :)" me.
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
I used to be a Blizzard fanboy but the past few years have taugh me otherwise and I started playing their games when they were still called Silicon and Synapse. They are like EA to me now.
Now I just log in once every three days for my dailys, if the last part of the game that I still enjoyed a little bit is now rotten with bots, what's the point of playing? None and it sucks.
Yeah, you are totally right. My apologies. I used to be a Blizzard fanboy like you a long time ago and gladly I'm not one anymore. Now, I'm dedicated to hunting those who were once my brothers, those who were once my comrades. :P
1. Money
2. More money
3. Easy money
And that makes it ok how?
I don't care, "fixing" someone's post is okay when it's a hard fact you're correct. "Fixing" is not okay when it's an opinion. It's saying "your opinion was wrong and here's what you meant to say."
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
Again, you miss the point entirely.
My post was not telling you that your opinion was wrong.
The fact was that your opinion was irrelevant because it could be made about any of the other things that I mentioned in the fixing of your post.
Judging by your over-aggressive reaction it simply proves that you care less about the facts of the matter than expecting other people to accept what you say simply because #opinion and you dislike your opinion being challenged in any way.
What makes it ok how?
fixed :)
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
You're on a roll! XD
Let's not mention the absolutely hilarious irony that you got your knickers in a twist because someone apparently challenged your opinion, but you're quite happy to challenge someone else's in your next breath.
Rrrrrinnggg!!
Oh! There's a phone call for you. It's kettle. Wow. He sounds pissed...! XD
doesn't feel so good to have someone 'fixed :)' your post does it?
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
Just out of curiosity, what's the point of creating a bot account to farm gold? You cannot transfer it to other accounts anyway...
They sell the account itself.
Regarding point two and three...
If people, or bots in this case, are free to play whatever they want. Why are they then, not free to play whatever they want (meta decks)?
Bots are against the TOS. People can play whatever they want within the TOS. I never said that meta decks shouldn't be allowed.
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
It didnt bother me in the slightest. I guess that's just one of the differences between us I suppose.
^_^
Maybe they run some of the bots themselves to make wild seem more active at low population hours, who knows.
But those bots aren't playing anything that's against the TOS. They're not limiting people in what they can play and not. Not in any different way than people do at least. To any other player, they're just another opponent.
Last night I was completing some quests at rank 20 in Wild. I conceded against a bot because I thought he was a new player with only Basic cards and I didn't feel like crushing him.
My next opponent also had a user name made up of random numbers and letters and was likewise playing a Warrior deck made up of entirely Basic cards. After that I just took the wins. I think I saw three different ones like that. It was refreshing not to face Reno Priests and fully-decked Midrange Hunters at Rank 20 for once, but they were obviously bots.