Instead of arguing/whining about the new mode and whether or not it’s good, just accept it for this thread. This is a question of what decks are good in this format and which are bad. For example, even warlock seems like a good candidate, with its ability to tech in anti aggro or anti control. Tempo rogue with the choice to sub out keleseth for a more miracle-esque build with saps/evis.
Instead of arguing/whining about the new mode and whether or not it’s good, just accept it for this thread. This is a question of what decks are good in this format and which are bad. For example, even warlock seems like a good candidate, with its ability to tech in anti aggro or anti control. Tempo rogue with the choice to sub out keleseth for a more miracle-esque build with saps/evis.
That one is more just ideas about how the format will be. This is more focused on making a lineup. For example, it’s not choose any 5 cards in the game for a side board. You come with 3 decks. No more than one deck had been said in that thread.
That one is more just ideas about how the format will be. This is more focused on making a lineup. For example, it’s not choose any 5 cards in the game for a side board. You come with 3 decks. No more than one deck had been said in that thread.
Im not sure u understod the way this system works? or am i misunderstanding u?
what about the line up itself guys? have an important match on the 28th of this month so if any of you has cool ideas just add me pbarbosa7#2151 i also have cool ideas to share with you and maybe we can make a good line up together :D
Don't need yet another thread about a topic that matters to no one here as no one here competes in tournaments. That post is just whining about whining.
Don't need yet another thread about a topic that matters to no one here as no one here competes in tournaments. That post is just whining about whining.
How do you know this is "a topic that matters to no one here"? How do you know that "no one here competes in tournaments"?
This thread is more about theorycrafting and user-16377173's thread seems to be listing actual deck lists that could be used in this format.
If you don't like the format, that's fine; but why come in here and say that no one cares?
I'm working on an odd paladin build, and I've got a rough secondary deck made. I have some ideas for what to put in for the anti control matchup (did somebody say TINKMASTER), but I don't know what to take out. Any ideas?
I saw that, but I’m no zalae. I’ve made it to legend a couple of times, so I’m not bad, but I suck at making decks. Plus, I’m trying to do this with an odd deck, which makes my life more difficult.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Instead of arguing/whining about the new mode and whether or not it’s good, just accept it for this thread. This is a question of what decks are good in this format and which are bad. For example, even warlock seems like a good candidate, with its ability to tech in anti aggro or anti control. Tempo rogue with the choice to sub out keleseth for a more miracle-esque build with saps/evis.
All ready started this: https://www.hearthpwn.com/forums/hearthstone-general/general-discussion/230223-ok-lets-try-this-new-specialist-format-out-in
:)
That one is more just ideas about how the format will be. This is more focused on making a lineup. For example, it’s not choose any 5 cards in the game for a side board. You come with 3 decks. No more than one deck had been said in that thread.
Im not sure u understod the way this system works? or am i misunderstanding u?
You look at the system like this:
1. Bring deck X
2. Play with deck X
3. Change 5 cards in deck X
But it’s like this:
1. Bring deck X, Y, and Z. Y and Z must only be 5 cards different than X.
2. Play with deck X
3. Choose to play with deck X, Y, or Z
Yes that is right, u play with 1 deck in three variations. After each match u can switch
But the 2 other decks have to be set before the games start, and before you know their deck.
Yeah i know that, but its just about trying it out in theory
what about the line up itself guys? have an important match on the 28th of this month so if any of you has cool ideas just add me pbarbosa7#2151 i also have cool ideas to share with you and maybe we can make a good line up together :D
I think i'm gonna start with control priest
Don't need yet another thread about a topic that matters to no one here as no one here competes in tournaments. That post is just whining about whining.
How do you know this is "a topic that matters to no one here"? How do you know that "no one here competes in tournaments"?
This thread is more about theorycrafting and user-16377173's thread seems to be listing actual deck lists that could be used in this format.
If you don't like the format, that's fine; but why come in here and say that no one cares?
"There is no spoon"
I'm working on an odd paladin build, and I've got a rough secondary deck made. I have some ideas for what to put in for the anti control matchup (did somebody say TINKMASTER), but I don't know what to take out. Any ideas?
Here's a link to a YT video. Zalae goes through his own thought process on making a bunch of line-ups - Cube Hunter, Clone Priest and Cube Warlock.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9Btu887cWg&t=571s
Hope it helps.
I saw that, but I’m no zalae. I’ve made it to legend a couple of times, so I’m not bad, but I suck at making decks. Plus, I’m trying to do this with an odd deck, which makes my life more difficult.