Just like that, we are back to DR Hunter, Big Priest, Spitefull Druid, normal Odd Warrior, Prince K Rogue! lol
So funny how that happens. Just when we were getting used to the meta, its diff again. All the deck building I did has to be scrapped now cuz of the meta change. I like the feshness. But I dislike how so many just go back to the same decks again, rather than experiment and build new decks and idea.
Am I the only one that experiments with Spirit of the the Tiger, for example?
Oh well, I guess its Witchwood Meta for the next 2 months.
Just like that, we are back to DR Hunter, Big Priest, Spitefull Druid, normal Odd Warrior, Prince K Rogue! lol
So funny how that happens. Just when we were getting used to the meta, its diff again. All the deck building I did has to be scrapped now cuz of the meta change. I like the feshness. But I dislike how so many just go back to the same decks again, rather than experiment and build new decks and idea.
Am I the only one that experiments with Spirit of the the Tiger, for example?
Oh well, I guess its Witchwood Meta for the next 2 months.
Feelssameman! lol
Good luck out there everyone.
I have seen Thijs play a Spiteful Priest that includes Bwomsamdi and Princess Talanji (also played it myself and it seems quite fun). But yes, it does feel like we are back to the spot we started,
nope, just an observation. a little dissapointment for sure from the lack of creativity, but I feel like that regardless. lol. far from salt my little bee friend! but thx for your input! good luck out there.
Please don't post when you cannot recognise a salt rant.
OP thinks he is the only one who experiments when everyone else net decks. He thinks the witchwood meta is back when, in reality, big/wall priest was non existent during witchwood, odd warrior and DR hunter became very popular only after boomsday. Witchwood meta was nothing like this meta.
"Good luck out there everyone" this sentence at the end pretty much makes it a salt rant.
I don't feel like this meta is anything like Witchwood. I haven't faced a single Spiteful Druid, most of Druids are either Hakkar or Mecha'thun. Odd and Miracle Rogue were pretty popular in Witchwood after nerfs, none of them played Keleseth. Also there were no Big Priest or any Priest, Odd Warrior, Beast Hunter, Odd Mage etc during Witchwood.
Obviously there are similarities like Evenlock, Odd and Even Paladin, but that is because of weak two expansions that followed Witchwood.
We have four expansions in Standard with mega strong cards. Everyone knows about DK's from KoFT, Cubes and the rest of the broken stuff from K&C, and Genn/Baku from TWW. But don't forget how many cards from J2U still see significant play, Fire Fly still goto 1-drop for many decks, new or old; Tar Creeper & Stonehill still used over and over for early game taunts. Tarim, Radiant, Visions, Razormaw, and LitJ still carrying specific archetypes.
There are too many cards in Standard. When new x-pacs have to compete with four or five others, there is a good chance they will simply get lost in the shuffle. Most of the cards will either slide into existing archetypes or see no play at all.
Despite all this, we have the Hakaar decks and Wall Priest. Not bad considering how difficult it is to make new archetypes competitive at this point.
I have seen Thijs play a Spiteful Priest that includes Bwomsamdi and Princess Talanji (also played it myself and it seems quite fun). But yes, it does feel like we are back to the spot we started,
I played it today without Talanji and a few other changes and got a 70% winrate - (though it was rank 17 to 10) over 37 games 26-11
The latter part of that had a tech that resulted in 10 - 3 at rank 13 to 10 which is 77%
Please don't post when you cannot recognise a salt rant.
OP thinks he is the only one who experiments when everyone else net decks. He thinks the witchwood meta is back when, in reality, big/wall priest was non existent during witchwood, odd warrior and DR hunter became very popular only after boomsday. Witchwood meta was nothing like this meta.
"Good luck out there everyone" this sentence at the end pretty much makes it a salt rant.
First of all, I'm the only one that doesn't netdeck.
Secondly, you kids toss around the salt "term" like con-artist exorcists.
You don't really want the meta to be based on the newest set right now.
The last two times the meta shifted according to the fall set was during Mean Streets and Kobolds. You know, when both Jade decks and Cubelock grew big then stayed big after rotation? Because the cards that made the decks strong were from a non-rotating set?
If Rumble knocked all of the DK and quest decks out of the way we would all be complaining by now about how the game is starting to get stale and groaning at how the same decks WILL remain after rotation.
The decks that are strong are based on last year's cards. This is the perfect time to have one last roll with them until they go away. Meanwhile, we have 2 YEARS to see what can be done with Rumble and boomsday. Hopefully they'll get their time. But not now. Now they can remain fun meme decks and Johnny dreams. Let them sleep till later on.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
One does not simply walk into Mordor,
unless they want to be the best they can be.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Just like that, we are back to DR Hunter, Big Priest, Spitefull Druid, normal Odd Warrior, Prince K Rogue! lol
So funny how that happens. Just when we were getting used to the meta, its diff again. All the deck building I did has to be scrapped now cuz of the meta change. I like the feshness. But I dislike how so many just go back to the same decks again, rather than experiment and build new decks and idea.
Am I the only one that experiments with Spirit of the the Tiger, for example?
Oh well, I guess its Witchwood Meta for the next 2 months.
Feelssameman! lol
Good luck out there everyone.
I have seen Thijs play a Spiteful Priest that includes Bwomsamdi and Princess Talanji (also played it myself and it seems quite fun). But yes, it does feel like we are back to the spot we started,
Secret paladin and wall priest in tier 1 is spicy
I am envoy from nowhere in nowhere. Nobody and nothing have sent me. And though it is impossible I exist. ©Trimutius
Wait, what about Hunter?
Seems like a salt rant
And all Mecha C'Thun decks that are everywhere now are from Boomsday.
nope, just an observation. a little dissapointment for sure from the lack of creativity, but I feel like that regardless. lol. far from salt my little bee friend! but thx for your input! good luck out there.
Please don't post when you cannot recognise a salt rant.
It's back to DR hunter being the best hunter deck. Spell/secret hunter back to tier 2-3.
OP thinks he is the only one who experiments when everyone else net decks. He thinks the witchwood meta is back when, in reality, big/wall priest was non existent during witchwood, odd warrior and DR hunter became very popular only after boomsday. Witchwood meta was nothing like this meta.
"Good luck out there everyone" this sentence at the end pretty much makes it a salt rant.
I don't feel like this meta is anything like Witchwood. I haven't faced a single Spiteful Druid, most of Druids are either Hakkar or Mecha'thun. Odd and Miracle Rogue were pretty popular in Witchwood after nerfs, none of them played Keleseth. Also there were no Big Priest or any Priest, Odd Warrior, Beast Hunter, Odd Mage etc during Witchwood.
Obviously there are similarities like Evenlock, Odd and Even Paladin, but that is because of weak two expansions that followed Witchwood.
We have four expansions in Standard with mega strong cards. Everyone knows about DK's from KoFT, Cubes and the rest of the broken stuff from K&C, and Genn/Baku from TWW. But don't forget how many cards from J2U still see significant play, Fire Fly still goto 1-drop for many decks, new or old; Tar Creeper & Stonehill still used over and over for early game taunts. Tarim, Radiant, Visions, Razormaw, and LitJ still carrying specific archetypes.
There are too many cards in Standard. When new x-pacs have to compete with four or five others, there is a good chance they will simply get lost in the shuffle. Most of the cards will either slide into existing archetypes or see no play at all.
Despite all this, we have the Hakaar decks and Wall Priest. Not bad considering how difficult it is to make new archetypes competitive at this point.
I played it today without Talanji and a few other changes and got a 70% winrate - (though it was rank 17 to 10) over 37 games 26-11
The latter part of that had a tech that resulted in 10 - 3 at rank 13 to 10 which is 77%
I can post stats if anyone cares.
.
First of all, I'm the only one that doesn't netdeck.
Secondly, you kids toss around the salt "term" like con-artist exorcists.
Fun > Meta
You don't really want the meta to be based on the newest set right now.
The last two times the meta shifted according to the fall set was during Mean Streets and Kobolds. You know, when both Jade decks and Cubelock grew big then stayed big after rotation? Because the cards that made the decks strong were from a non-rotating set?
If Rumble knocked all of the DK and quest decks out of the way we would all be complaining by now about how the game is starting to get stale and groaning at how the same decks WILL remain after rotation.
The decks that are strong are based on last year's cards. This is the perfect time to have one last roll with them until they go away. Meanwhile, we have 2 YEARS to see what can be done with Rumble and boomsday. Hopefully they'll get their time. But not now. Now they can remain fun meme decks and Johnny dreams. Let them sleep till later on.
One does not simply walk into Mordor,
unless they want to be the best they can be.