This could probably go in the salt forum but i wanna keep it strictly academic. What is the most Shirvallah's you've seen a paladin play in one game? For me the answer is 5 just curious if you guys have seen some crazy plays with shirvallah?
Also do you think the shirvallah should keep the discounted cost if he is pulled back to a player's hand or shuffled into the deck. I'm trying to think of any other cards that do that but my frustration level is at an all time high that i can't think of any off the top of my head.
Also do you think the shirvallah should keep the discounted cost if he is pulled back to a player's hand or shuffled into the deck. I'm trying to think of any other cards that do that but my frustration level is at an all time high that i can't think of any off the top of my head.
yes it should, the card is under a global effect. its the same with the +1/+1 that C'Thun gets
I played Big Spell Mage last week and I got both Shrivallah and Glinda Crowskin out of Syndragosa. So my answer is 6 on the field in one turn. It was amazing.
Gotcha, I can't say i'm a fan of that. I didn't see a lot of the mecha'thun era play because I was an f2p player back then so i wasn't able to build the rest of the deck around the freebees they gave everyone.
I played Big Spell Mage last week and I got both Shrivallah and Glinda Crowskin out of Syndragosa. So my answer is 6 on the field in one turn. It was amazing.
5 is the most i think you can make from zolaing and bouncing it. Shirvallah bouncing is like the biggest tempo swingy thing in HS right now, it's the true backbone of HW Pally. That is why i think the deck will still be around even with 4 mana equality.
It's currently my main deck, went to legend with it last month. Looks broken when you pull off the combo, but you often don't have the time. Equality and wild pyromancer on 4 is the way to survive against aggro decks, with equality at 4 the deck will still be ok against slow decks but I'd say aggro will become unmanageable.
Chances are this deck will disappear in the next couple of hour when the nerfs arrive.
By the way with a standard holy wrath decklist the maximum is 4. The normal one, zola and two bankers.
It's currently my main deck, went to legend with it last month. Looks broken when you pull off the combo, but you often don't have the time. Equality and wild pyromancer on 4 is the way to survive against aggro decks, with equality at 4 the deck will still be ok against slow decks but I'd say aggro will become unmanageable.
Chances are this deck will disappear in the next couple of hour when the nerfs arrive.
By the way with a standard holy wrath decklist the maximum is 4. The normal one, zola and two bankers.
I use Augmented Elekk, two Bankers, and Zola. That gives me 6, but if you count double for when it gets bounced back by Freezing Trap then I've played 8 in a game before.
Two bankers are sufficient to deal 50 damage. Zola is only useful against odd warriors to do the Uther OTK, and Augmented Elekk is only useful if you want to do 50 damage in one single turn. Which is basically only useful against priests, but they destroy your 50 damage set-up with psychic scream.
Why two bankers, zola AND brewmaster in the same deck? I don't get it. Weird anti-warlock control decklist or something like that?
Two bankers are sufficient to deal 50 damage. Zola is only useful against odd warriors to do the Uther OTK, and Augmented Elekk is only useful if you want to do 50 damage in one single turn. Which is basically only useful against priests, but they destroy your 50 damage set-up with psychic scream.
Why two bankers, zola AND brewmaster in the same deck? I don't get it. Weird anti-warlock control decklist or something like that?
I think the guy probably loses a lot so it was just for compensation of his bad plays. Didn't run spikeridge didn't run time out and used consecration that didn't kill a single minion and then he top decked a second consecration and used with equality on the next turn. I didn't understand either.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Google search: Is Hearthstone free to play?
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
This could probably go in the salt forum but i wanna keep it strictly academic. What is the most Shirvallah's you've seen a paladin play in one game? For me the answer is 5 just curious if you guys have seen some crazy plays with shirvallah?
Also do you think the shirvallah should keep the discounted cost if he is pulled back to a player's hand or shuffled into the deck. I'm trying to think of any other cards that do that but my frustration level is at an all time high that i can't think of any off the top of my head.
Google search: Is Hearthstone free to play?
yes it should, the card is under a global effect. its the same with the +1/+1 that C'Thun gets
I have yet to see a single Shirvallah lol. I play wild tho.
I played Big Spell Mage last week and I got both Shrivallah and Glinda Crowskin out of Syndragosa. So my answer is 6 on the field in one turn. It was amazing.
I tawt I taw a puddy tat.Gotcha, I can't say i'm a fan of that. I didn't see a lot of the mecha'thun era play because I was an f2p player back then so i wasn't able to build the rest of the deck around the freebees they gave everyone.
Google search: Is Hearthstone free to play?
Thing from Below has the same effect.
Haha brilliant :D
good example thank you
Google search: Is Hearthstone free to play?
5 is the most i think you can make from zolaing and bouncing it. Shirvallah bouncing is like the biggest tempo swingy thing in HS right now, it's the true backbone of HW Pally. That is why i think the deck will still be around even with 4 mana equality.
It's currently my main deck, went to legend with it last month. Looks broken when you pull off the combo, but you often don't have the time. Equality and wild pyromancer on 4 is the way to survive against aggro decks, with equality at 4 the deck will still be ok against slow decks but I'd say aggro will become unmanageable.
Chances are this deck will disappear in the next couple of hour when the nerfs arrive.
By the way with a standard holy wrath decklist the maximum is 4. The normal one, zola and two bankers.
this guy used a youthful brewmaster as well
Google search: Is Hearthstone free to play?
I use Augmented Elekk, two Bankers, and Zola. That gives me 6, but if you count double for when it gets bounced back by Freezing Trap then I've played 8 in a game before.
Two bankers are sufficient to deal 50 damage. Zola is only useful against odd warriors to do the Uther OTK, and Augmented Elekk is only useful if you want to do 50 damage in one single turn. Which is basically only useful against priests, but they destroy your 50 damage set-up with psychic scream.
Why two bankers, zola AND brewmaster in the same deck? I don't get it. Weird anti-warlock control decklist or something like that?
I think the guy probably loses a lot so it was just for compensation of his bad plays. Didn't run spikeridge didn't run time out and used consecration that didn't kill a single minion and then he top decked a second consecration and used with equality on the next turn. I didn't understand either.
Google search: Is Hearthstone free to play?