Imagine using a stats page as an example without checking the stats first.
Odd Paladin - highest winrate against any hunter deck: 71.4% Odd Quest Warrior - Highest winrate against any Hunter deck: 88.0%
Ouch! That's gotta sting, hey? Maybe next time try reading the stats before making ludicrous claims, kiddo. No wonder people call you a troll... XD
It must be tough having to compensate your reading comprehension with 10 year old memes, huh?
Please refer to Atramebtar's post (which I already referred you to previously) if that is within the grasp of your underdeveloped mind.
Hint: it's in the winrate of odd paladin against every single hunter deck, compared to the winrate of warrior decks against every hunter deck.
I always aim to be thorough, so let's go with your altered version of the stats and double check. And we will use the link provided in Atrementar's comment as you ssuggest.
Odd Paladin stats against the top 3 win rate Hunter decks (attached): - Best winrate: 70.6% - Overall winrate against those top three decks combined : 65.5% winrate
Odd Quest Warrior stats against the top 3 win rate Hunter decks (attached): - Best winrate: 87.4% - Overall winrate against those top three decks combined : 68.1%
So..... I think that pretty much settles that one. But I'm sure you'll try and argue it some more. ^_^
Imagine using a stats page as an example without checking the stats first.
Odd Paladin - highest winrate against any hunter deck: 71.4% Odd Quest Warrior - Highest winrate against any Hunter deck: 88.0%
Ouch! That's gotta sting, hey? Maybe next time try reading the stats before making ludicrous claims, kiddo. No wonder people call you a troll... XD
It must be tough having to compensate your reading comprehension with 10 year old memes, huh?
Please refer to Atramebtar's post (which I already referred you to previously) if that is within the grasp of your underdeveloped mind.
Hint: it's in the winrate of odd paladin against every single hunter deck, compared to the winrate of warrior decks against every hunter deck.
I always aim to be thorough, so let's go with your altered version of the stats and double check. And we will use the link provided in Atrementar's comment as you ssuggest.
Odd Paladin stats against the top 3 win rate Hunter decks (attached): - Best winrate: 70.6% - Overall winrate against those top three decks combined : 65.5% winrate
Odd Quest Warrior stats against the top 3 win rate Hunter decks (attached): - Best winrate: 87.4% - Overall winrate against those top three decks combined : 68.1%
So..... I think that pretty much settles that one. But I'm sure you'll try and argue it some more. ^_^
That is totally wrong. You are cherrypicking hunter decks to prove your point.
Odd Paladin :
Odd Quest Warrior :
As you can see, Warrior can rack up few percentage points against aggressive Hunter decks like Odd and Midrange but it's abysmal against Hunter decks that uses Kathrena Winterwisp and King Krush. Odd Paladin performs, on the other hand, is consistently very good against every Hunter deck out there.
Imagine using a stats page as an example without checking the stats first.
Odd Paladin - highest winrate against any hunter deck: 71.4% Odd Quest Warrior - Highest winrate against any Hunter deck: 88.0%
Ouch! That's gotta sting, hey? Maybe next time try reading the stats before making ludicrous claims, kiddo. No wonder people call you a troll... XD
It must be tough having to compensate your reading comprehension with 10 year old memes, huh?
Please refer to Atramebtar's post (which I already referred you to previously) if that is within the grasp of your underdeveloped mind.
Hint: it's in the winrate of odd paladin against every single hunter deck, compared to the winrate of warrior decks against every hunter deck.
I always aim to be thorough, so let's go with your altered version of the stats and double check. And we will use the link provided in Atrementar's comment as you ssuggest.
Odd Paladin stats against the top 3 win rate Hunter decks (attached): - Best winrate: 70.6% - Overall winrate against those top three decks combined : 65.5% winrate
Odd Quest Warrior stats against the top 3 win rate Hunter decks (attached): - Best winrate: 87.4% - Overall winrate against those top three decks combined : 68.1%
So..... I think that pretty much settles that one. But I'm sure you'll try and argue it some more. ^_^
That is totally wrong. You are cherrypicking hunter decks to prove your point.
Odd Paladin :
Odd Quest Warrior :
As you can see, Warrior can rack up few percentage points against aggressive Hunter decks like Odd and Midrange but it's abysmal against Hunter decks that uses Kathrena Winterwisp and King Krush. Odd Paladin performs, on the other hand, is consistently very good against every Hunter deck out there.
No it doesn't work that way. If you use that logic, you can put any number of decks in there to prove your point. I could easily insert a number of lesser played hunter decks with 80-100% loss rate against Warrior to counteract your argument.
There has to be a cut off point. So, either we look at the best winrate against the top rated hunter deck (in this case, it would be Odd Hunter, from the chart) or we look at the top 3 as I posted. In doing so, we can see how much better OQW is than OP.
Ironically, you complain about cherry-picking, and yet that is exactly what you just did there to make your own argument. You can't have it both ways.
I mean, look at your examples! You literally didn't even sort them by winrate! Lol
EDIT: Hang on. I just took a closer look at your results. Just look at the winrate for both decks against Spell Hunter (The most popular Hunter deck currently)
Warrior : 60.9% WR Paladin: 54.7% WR
I don't know if you were trying to confirm my point, but your stats actually back my argument up anyway, even with your cherry picking. So.... umm... thanks? :-D
No it doesn't work that way. If you use that logic, you can put any number of decks in there to prove your point. I could easily insert a number of lesser played hunter decks with 80-100% loss rate against Warrior to counteract your argument.
There has to be a cut off point. So, either we look at the best winrate against the top rated hunter deck (in this case, it would be Odd Hunter, from the chart) or we look at the top 3 as I posted. In doing so, we can see how much better OQW is than OP.
Those are all the most popular Hunter archetypes on the ladder right now, HSreplay has sufficient data on these decks. BTW feel free to find me these "90% - 100%" loss rate Hunter archetypes on HSreplay.
Ironically, you complain about cherry-picking, and yet that is exactly what you just did there to make your own argument. You can't have it both ways.
I mean, look at your examples! You literally didn't even sort them by winrate! Lol
How can I be cherrypicking ? I picked ALL the Hunter archetypes with data on HSreplay. I didn't pick 3 archetypes to support my claim, I picked ALL of them.
EDIT: Hang on. I just took a closer look at your results. Just look at the winrate for both decks against Spell Hunter (The most popular Hunter deck currently)
Warrior : 60.9% WR Paladin: 54.7% WR
I don't know if you were trying to confirm my point, but your stats actually back my argument up anyway, even with your cherry picking. So.... umm... thanks? :-D
Please take a closer look and hopefully you can see that against Deathrattle Hunter, Warrior has 20% winrate while Paladin has >70%. Recruit and Secret Hunter also have a 50%+ winrate against Warrior. Paladin has 60%+ winrate against ALL Hunter decks. Paladin is heavily favoured against ALL Hunter decks while Warrior is good against only 3 of them.
Please take a closer look and hopefully you can see that against Deathrattle Hunter, Warrior has 20% winrate while Paladin has >70%. Recruit and Secret Hunter also have a 50%+ winrate against Warrior. Paladin has 60%+ winrate against ALL Hunter decks. Paladin is heavily favoured against ALL Hunter decks while Warrior is good against only 3 of them.
*cough* Remind me what you were saying about Chery Picking data again? Hang on - let me go and find a random Hunter deck that proves my argument a second.
Oh wait. I don't have to, since literally the most commonly played Hunter deck in Hearthstone (Spell Hunter) already does that... ^_^
im not running its just that You always shift the discussion to another direction that doesnt serve the subject and arguing with Drunk is a waste of time .....
A waste of time for that specific drunk person because someone who's intoxicated still has more useful information to add than you generally.
You've added a whopping 0 input to this discussion so far, cute.
I'm at rank 7 and float between 7 and 10 with a spell/control/recruit hunter hybrid. Win rate fluctuates a percentage point or two, but mostly hovers around 57%. It's a fun deck, though against resurrection priests and voidlocks it's a white-knuckle ride to the finish.
I always aim to be thorough, so let's go with your altered version of the stats and double check. And we will use the link provided in Atrementar's comment as you ssuggest.
Odd Paladin stats against the top 3 win rate Hunter decks (attached): - Best winrate: 70.6% - Overall winrate against those top three decks combined : 65.5% winrate
Odd Quest Warrior stats against the top 3 win rate Hunter decks (attached): - Best winrate: 87.4% - Overall winrate against those top three decks combined : 68.1%
So..... I think that pretty much settles that one. But I'm sure you'll try and argue it some more. ^_^
It truly, truly boggles my mind how someone this daft is capable of starting up whatever device they use to access this website. Quite fascinating, really...
Good job ignoring the viciousSyndicate article completely, by the way (also in Aramentar's post). Granted, you pretty much had to since it completely destroys any and all of the pointless drivel you've typed in this thread so far, in a way that even someone as imbecilic as yourself could understand.
Now let's take a look at the entire picture rather than some cherry picked situation (sound familiar?) you're trying to depict. In which, for some reason, you think that winning 80% of the time against a deck that's played 2% of the time is better than winning 65% of the time against a deck that's played 12% of the time.
Odd quest warrior wins harder against a deck that's played 1.9% of the time. It's also unfavored against a deck that's played 25.9% of the time, and gets absolutely decimated by a deck that's played 12.6% of the time.
Odd paladin is favored against every hunter archetype on these lists, ranging from favored to extremely favored.
You're so, so wrong it is, again, not even funny. Good to see things haven't changed one bit though. Remember that time when a 5 mana Call to Arms would be "insane" in odd paladin? Good times...
im not running its just that You always shift the discussion to another direction that doesnt serve the subject and arguing with Drunk is a waste of time .....
A waste of time for that specific drunk person because someone who's intoxicated still has more useful information to add than you generally.
You've added a whopping 0 input to this discussion so far, cute.
Well thank you i prefer to look cute rather than some nerd who get drunk to fight people on cards game forum , and btw i made this thread to know what deck would people recommend to play it myself nothing more .
Finally found a deck that was able to punch through the wall of Combo Priests and Odd Warriors! Huzzah! That secures rank 5 for next season so I can chill and just play fun decks for the rest of the month. Or maybe some Wild and Arena.... such a relief!
Please take a closer look and hopefully you can see that against Deathrattle Hunter, Warrior has 20% winrate while Paladin has >70%. Recruit and Secret Hunter also have a 50%+ winrate against Warrior. Paladin has 60%+ winrate against ALL Hunter decks. Paladin is heavily favoured against ALL Hunter decks while Warrior is good against only 3 of them.
*cough* Remind me what you were saying about Chery Picking data again? Hang on - let me go and find a random Hunter deck that proves my argument a second.
Oh wait. I don't have to, since literally the most commonly played Hunter deck in Hearthstone (Spell Hunter) already does that... ^_^
Spell Hunter is favoured for both Odd Warrior and Paladin with only 5% more to Warrior. Deathratttle Hunter is HEAVILY UNFAVOURED for Warrior (20% wr) while Paladin has 70% wr against it. Secret and Recruit Hunter are also bad for Warrior.
There you go, 3 out 6 MOST popular Hunter decks has 50%+ winrate against Warrior while none of them even has 45%+ winrate against Paladin.
Please take a closer look and hopefully you can see that against Deathrattle Hunter, Warrior has 20% winrate while Paladin has >70%. Recruit and Secret Hunter also have a 50%+ winrate against Warrior. Paladin has 60%+ winrate against ALL Hunter decks. Paladin is heavily favoured against ALL Hunter decks while Warrior is good against only 3 of them.
*cough* Remind me what you were saying about Chery Picking data again? Hang on - let me go and find a random Hunter deck that proves my argument a second.
Oh wait. I don't have to, since literally the most commonly played Hunter deck in Hearthstone (Spell Hunter) already does that... ^_^
Spell Hunter is favoured for both Odd Warrior and Paladin with only 5% more to Warrior. Deathratttle Hunter is HEAVILY UNFAVOURED for Warrior (20% wr) while Paladin has 70% wr against it. Secret and Recruit Hunter are also bad for Warrior.
There you go, 3 out 6 MOST popular Hunter decks has 50%+ winrate against Warrior while none of them even has 45%+ winrate against Paladin.
I can see you're just not going to accept the stats don't support your argument without some real mental gymnastics and cherry-picking. For that reason and since I've already more than proved my point successfully, I don't feel there's anything more I need to add that hasn't already been said. The stats show that Odd Qu Warrior has a better win rate against the top Hunter deck AND the most played Hunter deck AND it outperforms against the top 3 hunter decks listed in comparison to Odd Paladin. Yes, if you wrangle the stats hard enough, there's a really outside example where it looks as if Odd Paladin would be better. But you have to ignore literally all the above points to do so and it doesn't represent the basis of the original argument. If you're an Odd Paladin and come up against a version of hunter that is almost never played like Deathrattle Hunter (according to the stats), then yes, it may be a better option than Odd Qu Warrior. Sigh.... well done. /smh
The stats show that Odd Qu Warrior has a better win rate against the top Hunter deck AND the most played Hunter deck AND it outperforms against the top 3 hunter decks listed in comparison to Odd Paladin.
Top three Hunter decks BY POPULARITY : Spell Hunter, Midrange Hunter, Secret Hunter.
Odd Paladin :
Spell Hunter : 54.7%
Midrange Hunter : 58.4%
Secret Hunter : 56.4%
avg : 56.5%
Odd Quest Warrior :
Spell Hunter : 60.9%
Midrange Hunter : 56.2%
Secret Hunter : 47.8%
avg: 54.97%
If you're an Odd Paladin and come up against a version of hunter that is almost never played like Deathrattle Hunter (according to the stats), then yes, it may be a better option than Odd Qu Warrior.
Deathrattle Hunter is 12.7% of all Hunter decks. Far from "never played".
im not running its just that You always shift the discussion to another direction that doesnt serve the subject and arguing with Drunk is a waste of time .....
A waste of time for that specific drunk person because someone who's intoxicated still has more useful information to add than you generally.
You've added a whopping 0 input to this discussion so far, cute.
Well thank you i prefer to look cute rather than some nerd who get drunk to fight people on cards game forum , and btw i made this thread to know what deck would people recommend to play it myself nothing more .
Wait who am I fighting again?
You made a thread and in that very thread someone posted a very blatant lie (warrior being the best deck against hunter). This might lead newer users to craft and or play the wrong decks due to misleading information. I call that user out for it and a discussion starts.
Rather than either partaking in or ignoring the discussion, you instead decide to post some random memes.
How am I the one shifting the discussion that doesn't serve the subject (whatever that means) again?
If you're an Odd Paladin and come up against a version of hunter that is almost never played like Deathrattle Hunter (according to the stats), then yes, it may be a better option than Odd Qu Warrior.
Deathrattle Hunter is 12.7% of all Hunter decks. Far from "never played".
You think only 12% of all hunter decks across the meta constitutes being played a lot. Ok.... sigh....
If you're an Odd Paladin and come up against a version of hunter that is almost never played like Deathrattle Hunter (according to the stats), then yes, it may be a better option than Odd Qu Warrior.
Deathrattle Hunter is 12.7% of all Hunter decks. Far from "never played".
You think only 12% of all hunter decks across the meta constitutes being played a lot. Ok.... sigh....
8th most popular deck in the meta, behind Spell, Midrange, Secret Hunter, Odd Paladin, Control, Clone Priest and Odd Rogue.
If that doesn't satisfy you then I can happily ignore Deathrattle Hunter and other Hunter decks less popular than it. That leaves us with Spell Hunter, Secret Hunter and Midrange Hunter. The average winrate of Odd Paladin against these three decks is higher than that of Odd Quest Warrior:
If you're an Odd Paladin and come up against a version of hunter that is almost never played like Deathrattle Hunter (according to the stats), then yes, it may be a better option than Odd Qu Warrior.
Deathrattle Hunter is 12.7% of all Hunter decks. Far from "never played".
You think only 12% of all hunter decks across the meta constitutes being played a lot. Ok.... sigh....
8th most popular deck in the meta, behind Spell, Midrange, Secret Hunter, Odd Paladin, Control, Clone Priest and Odd Rogue.
If that doesn't satisfy you then I can happily ignore Deathrattle Hunter and other Hunter decks less popular than it. That leaves us with Spell Hunter, Secret Hunter and Midrange Hunter. The average winrate of Odd Paladin against these three decks is higher than that of Odd Quest Warrior:
Odd Paladin :
Spell Hunter : 54.7%
Midrange Hunter : 58.4%
Secret Hunter : 56.4%
avg : 56.5%
Odd Quest Warrior :
Spell Hunter : 60.9%
Midrange Hunter : 56.2%
Secret Hunter : 47.8%
avg: 54.97%
8th most popular deck.... out of 8 decks.... /facepalm. Runner up is still last place in a 2 horse race. Sigh...
Not to mention the cherry picking once again. You might as well just leave it with this and be done with it:
Job done. But feel free to keep trying to cherry picking ways of getting a false positive from your results. I've given you the facts with evidence. You can keep trying to fiddle the data all you like. All this just because the previous guy was being a troll and failed. Lol! I don't see any value in continuing to prove my point in this way and as I said before: I hate having to repeat myhself. Damn... look what you went and did... >_>
What about the other two most popular Hunter decks, Secret and Midrange Hunter ? 2nd and 3rd most played deck in the meta. Why are you ignoring these two decks ?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
im Sure he will XD
That is totally wrong. You are cherrypicking hunter decks to prove your point.
Odd Paladin :
Odd Quest Warrior :
As you can see, Warrior can rack up few percentage points against aggressive Hunter decks like Odd and Midrange but it's abysmal against Hunter decks that uses Kathrena Winterwisp and King Krush. Odd Paladin performs, on the other hand, is consistently very good against every Hunter deck out there.
No it doesn't work that way. If you use that logic, you can put any number of decks in there to prove your point.
I could easily insert a number of lesser played hunter decks with 80-100% loss rate against Warrior to counteract your argument.
There has to be a cut off point. So, either we look at the best winrate against the top rated hunter deck (in this case, it would be Odd Hunter, from the chart) or we look at the top 3 as I posted.
In doing so, we can see how much better OQW is than OP.
Ironically, you complain about cherry-picking, and yet that is exactly what you just did there to make your own argument. You can't have it both ways.
I mean, look at your examples! You literally didn't even sort them by winrate! Lol
EDIT:
Hang on. I just took a closer look at your results. Just look at the winrate for both decks against Spell Hunter (The most popular Hunter deck currently)
Warrior : 60.9% WR
Paladin: 54.7% WR
I don't know if you were trying to confirm my point, but your stats actually back my argument up anyway, even with your cherry picking.
So.... umm... thanks? :-D
Those are all the most popular Hunter archetypes on the ladder right now, HSreplay has sufficient data on these decks. BTW feel free to find me these "90% - 100%" loss rate Hunter archetypes on HSreplay.
How can I be cherrypicking ? I picked ALL the Hunter archetypes with data on HSreplay. I didn't pick 3 archetypes to support my claim, I picked ALL of them.
Please take a closer look and hopefully you can see that against Deathrattle Hunter, Warrior has 20% winrate while Paladin has >70%. Recruit and Secret Hunter also have a 50%+ winrate against Warrior. Paladin has 60%+ winrate against ALL Hunter decks. Paladin is heavily favoured against ALL Hunter decks while Warrior is good against only 3 of them.
*cough* Remind me what you were saying about Chery Picking data again?
Hang on - let me go and find a random Hunter deck that proves my argument a second.
Oh wait. I don't have to, since literally the most commonly played Hunter deck in Hearthstone (Spell Hunter) already does that...
^_^
A waste of time for that specific drunk person because someone who's intoxicated still has more useful information to add than you generally.
You've added a whopping 0 input to this discussion so far, cute.
First post ever in here. Hi guys.
I'm at rank 7 and float between 7 and 10 with a spell/control/recruit hunter hybrid. Win rate fluctuates a percentage point or two, but mostly hovers around 57%. It's a fun deck, though against resurrection priests and voidlocks it's a white-knuckle ride to the finish.
It truly, truly boggles my mind how someone this daft is capable of starting up whatever device they use to access this website. Quite fascinating, really...
Good job ignoring the viciousSyndicate article completely, by the way (also in Aramentar's post). Granted, you pretty much had to since it completely destroys any and all of the pointless drivel you've typed in this thread so far, in a way that even someone as imbecilic as yourself could understand.
Now let's take a look at the entire picture rather than some cherry picked situation (sound familiar?) you're trying to depict. In which, for some reason, you think that winning 80% of the time against a deck that's played 2% of the time is better than winning 65% of the time against a deck that's played 12% of the time.
Odd paladin versus hunter: https://gyazo.com/30e73db2412da32a725164ace37e2cd3
Odd quest warrior versus hunter: https://gyazo.com/e35a331eaaaedd2c1915bc17e4a3fdfc
Odd quest warrior wins harder against a deck that's played 1.9% of the time. It's also unfavored against a deck that's played 25.9% of the time, and gets absolutely decimated by a deck that's played 12.6% of the time.
Odd paladin is favored against every hunter archetype on these lists, ranging from favored to extremely favored.
You're so, so wrong it is, again, not even funny. Good to see things haven't changed one bit though. Remember that time when a 5 mana Call to Arms would be "insane" in odd paladin? Good times...
Well thank you i prefer to look cute rather than some nerd who get drunk to fight people on cards game forum , and btw i made this thread to know what deck would people recommend to play it myself nothing more .
Only decks I have a 55%+ winrate with is Control Mage and Odd Rogue :/
https://outof.cards
Finally found a deck that was able to punch through the wall of Combo Priests and Odd Warriors!
Huzzah!
That secures rank 5 for next season so I can chill and just play fun decks for the rest of the month.
Or maybe some Wild and Arena.... such a relief!
Spell Hunter is favoured for both Odd Warrior and Paladin with only 5% more to Warrior. Deathratttle Hunter is HEAVILY UNFAVOURED for Warrior (20% wr) while Paladin has 70% wr against it. Secret and Recruit Hunter are also bad for Warrior.
There you go, 3 out 6 MOST popular Hunter decks has 50%+ winrate against Warrior while none of them even has 45%+ winrate against Paladin.
I can see you're just not going to accept the stats don't support your argument without some real mental gymnastics and cherry-picking. For that reason and since I've already more than proved my point successfully, I don't feel there's anything more I need to add that hasn't already been said.
The stats show that Odd Qu Warrior has a better win rate against the top Hunter deck AND the most played Hunter deck AND it outperforms against the top 3 hunter decks listed in comparison to Odd Paladin.
Yes, if you wrangle the stats hard enough, there's a really outside example where it looks as if Odd Paladin would be better. But you have to ignore literally all the above points to do so and it doesn't represent the basis of the original argument.
If you're an Odd Paladin and come up against a version of hunter that is almost never played like Deathrattle Hunter (according to the stats), then yes, it may be a better option than Odd Qu Warrior.
Sigh.... well done.
/smh
Top three Hunter decks BY POPULARITY : Spell Hunter, Midrange Hunter, Secret Hunter.
Odd Paladin :
Spell Hunter : 54.7%
Midrange Hunter : 58.4%
Secret Hunter : 56.4%
avg : 56.5%
Odd Quest Warrior :
Spell Hunter : 60.9%
Midrange Hunter : 56.2%
Secret Hunter : 47.8%
avg: 54.97%
Deathrattle Hunter is 12.7% of all Hunter decks. Far from "never played".
Wait who am I fighting again?
You made a thread and in that very thread someone posted a very blatant lie (warrior being the best deck against hunter). This might lead newer users to craft and or play the wrong decks due to misleading information. I call that user out for it and a discussion starts.
Rather than either partaking in or ignoring the discussion, you instead decide to post some random memes.
How am I the one shifting the discussion that doesn't serve the subject (whatever that means) again?
You think only 12% of all hunter decks across the meta constitutes being played a lot.
Ok.... sigh....
8th most popular deck in the meta, behind Spell, Midrange, Secret Hunter, Odd Paladin, Control, Clone Priest and Odd Rogue.
If that doesn't satisfy you then I can happily ignore Deathrattle Hunter and other Hunter decks less popular than it. That leaves us with Spell Hunter, Secret Hunter and Midrange Hunter. The average winrate of Odd Paladin against these three decks is higher than that of Odd Quest Warrior:
Odd Paladin :
Spell Hunter : 54.7%
Midrange Hunter : 58.4%
Secret Hunter : 56.4%
avg : 56.5%
Odd Quest Warrior :
Spell Hunter : 60.9%
Midrange Hunter : 56.2%
Secret Hunter : 47.8%
avg: 54.97%
.... My winrate across all hunters with my odd taunt warrior variant is close to 86% and odd pala is for breakfast .. And now ?
8th most popular deck.... out of 8 decks.... /facepalm.
Runner up is still last place in a 2 horse race. Sigh...
Not to mention the cherry picking once again. You might as well just leave it with this and be done with it:
Odd Paladin :
(Most commonly played deck) Spell Hunter : 54.7%
Odd Quest Warrior :
(Most commonly played deck) Spell Hunter : 60.9%
Job done. But feel free to keep trying to cherry picking ways of getting a false positive from your results.
I've given you the facts with evidence. You can keep trying to fiddle the data all you like. All this just because the previous guy was being a troll and failed. Lol!
I don't see any value in continuing to prove my point in this way and as I said before: I hate having to repeat myhself.
Damn... look what you went and did... >_>
There are total 16 tier 1 and tier 2 decks. So 8th out of 16.
What about the other two most popular Hunter decks, Secret and Midrange Hunter ? 2nd and 3rd most played deck in the meta. Why are you ignoring these two decks ?