RR is , and more importantly will be a successful Expansion.
People have to quit thinking that every expansion there will be lots of new decks. Blizzard could give us Legendarys with the powerlevel of DKs every expansion, but that would simply turn HS into a pile of powercreep s..t . Almost no older cards would matter because every new DK is stronger...
And I won’t even start about the complaining from F2P guys....
Why is every complaint on here from a FTP player? I guess I just don't understand why you would complain about something that's free? If you don't like it, then don't play it. It was free. You lost nothing. I could understand being upset if you spent $50 on the expansion and were then disappointed. Also at that point, you are technically not a customer since you're not spending any money so why would blizzard even care what you think?
As for this expansion, not every expansion can have a crazy power level. Some expansions are going to inherently be less powerful than others which is actually a good thing not a disadvantage. Power creep in Hearthstone has been a problem for a long time which is why they keep making changes to the classic set. That being said there are some fun cards in this set that might see play once they get some support in a future expansion. Unfortunately it seems that much of the community doesn't have the patience for that.
its because they printed pretty broken cards in other expansions so new cards kinda jelly comparin to them :D
I am playing pirate rogue with at least 15 cards from the new expansion, so I am complaining about the others who choose to include a few or none at all. Read carefully, thanks.
Look at that text wall, that thing is beautiful! Donald Trump would be proud!
Our media in EU let us believe that Trump was the inventor of the wall... Thanks to Youtube and it's algorithm showed me an documentation about the wall... It was astounding to see, that this whole wall is already there...
Now I think that he wants to protect specific areas, where's a lot of traffic, am I right? I listened to an interview and he said, he wants the people to come through the door not above the wall... I mean, by all criticism, is that so wrong?
Give this man a troll metal. Best troll of 2018
srsly dude, I am not living there... honest question
I heard also months ago about #walkaway, also dunno if it's true or not...
"Arena is boring" - lol. Kido, arena has never been better before. Tho its due to new buckets system, but Rashtakan surely gave us some good picks.
You are purposely trying to prove u are right. Its like betting on your favourite team, you will always find a reason to choose them.
I will agree tho that Overkill and Spirits are boring/unsuccesful
Yes arena is boring, and saying that by getting 12 wins with paladin just today, it is boring because what I did was basically to put the highest cost minion and buff them every single turn, trade trade trade trade, go face, trade, go face go face while there is no minion to trade, absolutely no punishment, getting 12 wins consistently doesn't make arena good, the comebacks, each different strategy with the same deck every run makes it 'fun' to play. I am a main Arena player and arena got better when the epic & legendary pick rates increased and got worst when spell draft dramatically decreased.
Y'all are gonna hate me for saying this but it needs to be said.
I know we all loved him, but Ben brode's tenure as game director (WOG -> K&C) was simply bad for HS, giving us super OP (garbage) sets. Four months until his legacy is gone from standard and Good riddance.
I'm really looking forward to playing viable decks that aren't broken.
I'm sorry but if you start off with "what makes an expansion good?" and then use MSoG as your first example of a -good- expansion, then I'm not even gonna read the rest.
MSoG was arguably the most broken shitshow of an expansion ever. If you think that makes it a good expansion... Boy am I glad you're not working for Blizzard then.
"Arena is boring" - lol. Kido, arena has never been better before. Tho its due to new buckets system, but Rashtakan surely gave us some good picks.
You are purposely trying to prove u are right. Its like betting on your favourite team, you will always find a reason to choose them.
I will agree tho that Overkill and Spirits are boring/unsuccesful
Yes arena is boring, and saying that by getting 12 wins with paladin just today, it is boring because what I did was basically to put the highest cost minion and buff them every single turn, trade trade trade trade, go face, trade, go face go face while there is no minion to trade, absolutely no punishment, getting 12 wins consistently doesn't make arena good, the comebacks, each different strategy with the same deck every run makes it 'fun' to play. I am a main Arena player and arena got better when the epic & legendary pick rates increased and got worst when spell draft dramatically decreased.
I played maybe 30 arena games totally, because it ALWAYS felt like what you described...
Playing the biggest dude , taking the best trades, and don’t play around anything ( now that MCT is gone ) .
Apologies for the responses that you get. Mind you, a good analysis falls short on fora like these crawling with mindless fanboys only looking for chitchat and likes.
Hey yo, the defender of truth, not everyone having a different opinion than a salty boy, is a fan boy. Are you a lawyer sir? Hope not. Go crawl in your salty dirty holes and live us the fanboys here
Apologies for the responses that you get. Mind you, a good analysis falls short on fora like these crawling with mindless fanboys only looking for chitchat and likes.
I wonder the same thing when I read this. It sounds like you care about the game, but I'm not sure why you are here on Hearthpwn posting garbage for people who don't really care but to argue about who has the bigger E ....
It's called feeding the Trolls, and pick a better subject than why an expansion is bad. Sure you created a whole wall of text to defend your argument, but it's silly. People want to argue about specific cards and decks. It's more fun.
For instance, when MSoG released, new archetypes emerged.
You can't give MSoG as an example of a good expansion. All I can remember from MSoG is countless whining about Jade, Patches, Drakonid Operative etc. There was thread few months about worst expansion ever and many people mentioned MSoG as their top choice.
Apologies for the responses that you get. Mind you, a good analysis falls short on fora like these crawling with mindless fanboys only looking for chitchat and likes.
I wonder the same thing when I read this. It sounds like you care about the game, but I'm not sure why you are here on Hearthpwn posting garbage for people who don't really care but to argue about who has the bigger E ....
It's called feeding the Trolls, and pick a better subject than why an expansion is bad. Sure you created a whole wall of text to defend your argument, but it's silly. People want to argue about specific cards and decks. It's more fun.
I never in my life hesitated to say what I believed in, no matter where unless it is extremely inappropriate for the given circumstances, yet I here basically pointed out why this expansion is bad and obviously HS deserves better because it is a good game, it would be illogical for me to say that HS is a bad game then I would just uninstall it, I rather try to highlight what might contribute to the future expansions, but there are other things that bothers me, those are something more deep related to the strategies that are implied by Blizzard on purpose for more profit. I, of course do not even argue those with this toxic community, though there are reasonable mature minds. The current motivation driven by those who spend tons of real money on the game - which I do not criticise since it is their own choice - is not to have a better game experience, but rather to punish others by aiming to have a deck that makes others whine, which is slowly establishing a definition of satisfaction in HS.
I'm sorry but if you start off with "what makes an expansion good?" and then use MSoG as your first example of a -good- expansion, then I'm not even gonna read the rest.
MSoG was arguably the most broken shitshow of an expansion ever. If you think that makes it a good expansion... Boy am I glad you're not working for Blizzard then.
MSoG was a very good expansion by the design as it was unique in the sense that the nine different classes are divided into three clans with different mechanics, and it would be the one of the best expansions if warrior & hunter & paladin clan was better to compete jades or reno decks. Pirate warrior was a thing because there weren't enough cards provided to survive pass turn 5 i.e. taunts, heals, armors.
Apologies for the responses that you get. Mind you, a good analysis falls short on fora like these crawling with mindless fanboys only looking for chitchat and likes.
I wonder the same thing when I read this. It sounds like you care about the game, but I'm not sure why you are here on Hearthpwn posting garbage for people who don't really care but to argue about who has the bigger E ....
It's called feeding the Trolls, and pick a better subject than why an expansion is bad. Sure you created a whole wall of text to defend your argument, but it's silly. People want to argue about specific cards and decks. It's more fun.
I never in my life hesitated to say what I believed in, no matter where unless it is extremely inappropriate for the given circumstances, yet I here basically pointed out why this expansion is bad and obviously HS deserves better because it is a good game, it would be illogical for me to say that HS is a bad game then I would just uninstall it, I rather try to highlight what might contribute to the future expansions, but there are other things that bothers me, those are something more deep related to the strategies that are implied by Blizzard on purpose for more profit. I, of course do not even argue those with this toxic community, though there are reasonable mature minds. The current motivation driven by those who spend tons of real money on the game - which I do not criticise since it is their own choice - is not to have a better game experience, but rather to punish others by aiming to have a deck that makes others whine, which is slowly establishing a definition of satisfaction in HS.
You would make a better case if you did not attack paying players as "not wanting to have a better game experience" and (paraphrasing) "wanting to ruin the game for F2P players."
Furthermore, I already refuted your original claim and you haven't yet responded to it, except to bring up some completely irrelevant posts I've made.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Life before death. Strength before weakness. Journey before destination.
So your problem with arena is that the RNG in the draft is no longer compensating so heavily for shitty play? Cry me river.
The bucket system feels like a pile of extra RNG to me, honestly. If you have to have X shit cards in your deck regardless, often enough games come down to who drew less of their abysmal cards, I find. Less so with RR - currently it's quite heavily dependant on what you face; you can't build a decent deck against everything. faced a warrior with a slowish deck? Instalose to the stupid value of 3+ Dragon roar etc., with mirrors coming down to who was greedier (or most aggressive, for aggro).
I feel this describes the arena situation very accurately
you haven't yet responded to it, except to bring up some completely irrelevant posts I've made.
Because thanks to your never-ending spams (I don't block people unless they go extreme about something e.g. racist jokes), I got to know that you are no different and just making those net decks while climbing the ladder, you complained about Even Lock and how it can possibly be a good deck, while it was simply one of the best and was brought into every single tournament.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Exactly!
RR is , and more importantly will be a successful Expansion.
People have to quit thinking that every expansion there will be lots of new decks. Blizzard could give us Legendarys with the powerlevel of DKs every expansion, but that would simply turn HS into a pile of powercreep s..t . Almost no older cards would matter because every new DK is stronger...
And I won’t even start about the complaining from F2P guys....
Why is every complaint on here from a FTP player? I guess I just don't understand why you would complain about something that's free? If you don't like it, then don't play it. It was free. You lost nothing. I could understand being upset if you spent $50 on the expansion and were then disappointed. Also at that point, you are technically not a customer since you're not spending any money so why would blizzard even care what you think?
As for this expansion, not every expansion can have a crazy power level. Some expansions are going to inherently be less powerful than others which is actually a good thing not a disadvantage. Power creep in Hearthstone has been a problem for a long time which is why they keep making changes to the classic set. That being said there are some fun cards in this set that might see play once they get some support in a future expansion. Unfortunately it seems that much of the community doesn't have the patience for that.
its because they printed pretty broken cards in other expansions so new cards kinda jelly comparin to them :D
I am playing pirate rogue with at least 15 cards from the new expansion, so I am complaining about the others who choose to include a few or none at all. Read carefully, thanks.
srsly dude, I am not living there... honest question
I heard also months ago about #walkaway, also dunno if it's true or not...
.
Did OP quit again? Yawn.
"Arena is boring" - lol. Kido, arena has never been better before. Tho its due to new buckets system, but Rashtakan surely gave us some good picks.
You are purposely trying to prove u are right. Its like betting on your favourite team, you will always find a reason to choose them.
I will agree tho that Overkill and Spirits are boring/unsuccesful
Yes arena is boring, and saying that by getting 12 wins with paladin just today, it is boring because what I did was basically to put the highest cost minion and buff them every single turn, trade trade trade trade, go face, trade, go face go face while there is no minion to trade, absolutely no punishment, getting 12 wins consistently doesn't make arena good, the comebacks, each different strategy with the same deck every run makes it 'fun' to play. I am a main Arena player and arena got better when the epic & legendary pick rates increased and got worst when spell draft dramatically decreased.
Y'all are gonna hate me for saying this but it needs to be said.
I know we all loved him, but Ben brode's tenure as game director (WOG -> K&C) was simply bad for HS, giving us super OP (garbage) sets. Four months until his legacy is gone from standard and Good riddance.
I'm really looking forward to playing viable decks that aren't broken.
I'm sorry but if you start off with "what makes an expansion good?" and then use MSoG as your first example of a -good- expansion, then I'm not even gonna read the rest.
MSoG was arguably the most broken shitshow of an expansion ever. If you think that makes it a good expansion... Boy am I glad you're not working for Blizzard then.
I played maybe 30 arena games totally, because it ALWAYS felt like what you described...
Playing the biggest dude , taking the best trades, and don’t play around anything ( now that MCT is gone ) .
Hey yo, the defender of truth, not everyone having a different opinion than a salty boy, is a fan boy. Are you a lawyer sir? Hope not. Go crawl in your salty dirty holes and live us the fanboys here
I wonder the same thing when I read this. It sounds like you care about the game, but I'm not sure why you are here on Hearthpwn posting garbage for people who don't really care but to argue about who has the bigger E ....
It's called feeding the Trolls, and pick a better subject than why an expansion is bad. Sure you created a whole wall of text to defend your argument, but it's silly. People want to argue about specific cards and decks. It's more fun.
You can't give MSoG as an example of a good expansion. All I can remember from MSoG is countless whining about Jade, Patches, Drakonid Operative etc. There was thread few months about worst expansion ever and many people mentioned MSoG as their top choice.
I never in my life hesitated to say what I believed in, no matter where unless it is extremely inappropriate for the given circumstances, yet I here basically pointed out why this expansion is bad and obviously HS deserves better because it is a good game, it would be illogical for me to say that HS is a bad game then I would just uninstall it, I rather try to highlight what might contribute to the future expansions, but there are other things that bothers me, those are something more deep related to the strategies that are implied by Blizzard on purpose for more profit. I, of course do not even argue those with this toxic community, though there are reasonable mature minds. The current motivation driven by those who spend tons of real money on the game - which I do not criticise since it is their own choice - is not to have a better game experience, but rather to punish others by aiming to have a deck that makes others whine, which is slowly establishing a definition of satisfaction in HS.
MSoG was a very good expansion by the design as it was unique in the sense that the nine different classes are divided into three clans with different mechanics, and it would be the one of the best expansions if warrior & hunter & paladin clan was better to compete jades or reno decks. Pirate warrior was a thing because there weren't enough cards provided to survive pass turn 5 i.e. taunts, heals, armors.
You would make a better case if you did not attack paying players as "not wanting to have a better game experience" and (paraphrasing) "wanting to ruin the game for F2P players."
Furthermore, I already refuted your original claim and you haven't yet responded to it, except to bring up some completely irrelevant posts I've made.
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
I feel this describes the arena situation very accurately
Because thanks to your never-ending spams (I don't block people unless they go extreme about something e.g. racist jokes), I got to know that you are no different and just making those net decks while climbing the ladder, you complained about Even Lock and how it can possibly be a good deck, while it was simply one of the best and was brought into every single tournament.