Trump is one of the worst things happend to the world the past years. No president in history was lying more than he does. Why do the people from all over the world tend more and more to stupid populism? I hate that.
To your question. Some people say he is the best. Why? I never got that. I think people who belive in Trump are just stupid. There is absolutly no reason to think different. And the worst is that people don’t like to accept that he is wrong and they got cought by populism. So there are still many people who are fighting for him. I don’t get it.
But like I said. It is a global problem. Populism. Fight that by informing yourself. And don’t do that by facebook or twitter. Thanks to the algorithms you might be missleaded.
Ahh and by the way. Everyone who says there are fake news is stupid as well. All the bad things about Trump are true.
When you have to make a new account just to cry about something irrelevant to the OP’s question. Can’t tell if this is a troll, or if you’re actually braindead. I could link you a few medical places where you could get treatment.
After posting I noticed I logged in for the first time with twitch. I knew someone would post that. But I never posted much. Since beta I have about 15 posts on heartstone. But I had to comment on this.
I would recommend all of your suggestions to you.
First, this forum is called Hearthpwn, not Hearthstone. Second, how the hell didn't you notice you were using a different account before posting? And third, no, you didn't have to comment on this thread, because it is not about Donald Trump and political discussions are not allowed here.
Logged in just to say he is the nicest guy on the Internet. There are better players, of course, but the dude is one of the best entertainers playing Hearthstone on Twitch.
Was thinking the same thing, the mayor of value town has a huge heart for sure and he's always thanking his followers on twitch. He's pretty cool to watch and I like how he keeps it PG salty as I don't think I can name you another PG salty player but then Kolento came to mind. He's a good player to watch too.
I used to like him alot, tho he is not good - in sense ur asking. He is easily belove 0.1%, but that makes 100000 of us.
His biggest advantages is being the first one to play beta, that didnt come from his personality nor skill
Saying he isn’t good is kinda preposterous
Saying he is good is kinda preposterous.
I haven’t watched his stream in a while but I am pretty sure he is a consistent Legend player still, isn’t he? So he is at the very least pretty decent and way above average.
He's a funny guy that ensures I always have things to watch on youtube in the morning. The occasional shenanigans are great. What's not to like? You can't really blame him for the blatant selling out either. I mean, isn't it normal and human to want to make money when the opportunities arise?
Oh ... this thread is about the hearthstone streamer ... whoops :P
Logged in just to say he is the nicest guy on the Internet. There are better players, of course, but the dude is one of the best entertainers playing Hearthstone on Twitch.
Was thinking the same thing, the mayor of value town has a huge heart for sure and he's always thanking his followers on twitch. He's pretty cool to watch and I like how he keeps it PG salty as I don't think I can name you another PG salty player but then Kolento came to mind. He's a good player to watch too.
Let's get some shoutouts for Kolento, one of the best chill Hearthstone streams that features high level gameplay; I've had Kolento lull me into naps many times and I mean that as a high compliment.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
If you thought you knew what you think I know, then you'd know I knew you knew I know.
His predictions of cards are just pathetic, he has little idea of what makes cards strong or potentially strong.
I disagree. I think although his analysis on many cards have been well off the mark on many an occasion, his reasoning is well founded. Let’s take what most people take to be the most egregious example, his analysis of Warlock’s KotFT cards (and this actually ties into some confusions people have about his rating system).
Trumps rating system is not based on the individual strength of a card. He believes (correctly, in ny opinion) that it is ridiculous to do a rating system based on the isolated power level of a card because cards are never isolated. They always exist within the context of other cards. In addition, when you make a claim about a card that’s based on pure powerlevel it’s impossible to ever actually prove it wrong since no matter what happens you can just say “the conditions aren’t right for it.” For this reason Trump designed a rating system which does not attempt to say how good the card is but instead only tries to predict the amount of play it sees. As trump admits, this makes his rating system much riskier as you can actually prove him wrong or right once the cards come out.
Now onto his Warlock predictions. Prior to Frozen Throne, Warlock was in such a bad shape that Trump believed that it was probably impossible for one set to pull Warlock out of the dumpster no matter how good the cards it got were. As it turned out, Warlock got some pretty crazy cards in Throne and Trump acknowledged this in his review. His assertion was that there still wasn’t a way for Warlocks to win games despite all of the insanely powerful defense tools they got (which he actually said were insanely powerful) since they didn’t have any kind of reliable wincon. The reason he was wrong was because practically everyone reviewing the set, including him, underestimated the independent strength of Bloodreaver Gul’Dan. Gul’dan is so good that you could make a serious arguement that Warlock wouldn’t see play right now we’re it not for Gul’dan, which actually means that we’re it not for Gul’Dan, all of Trumps other predictions on the Warlock cards would have been correct as none of them would see any play because Warlock would not see any play.
He believes (correctly, in ny opinion) that it is ridiculous to do a rating system based on the isolated power level of a card because cards are never isolated. They always exist within the context of other cards.
That is precisely why he is so poor at card evaluation. He creates his own hypothetical meta and then judges cards based on that, with the same standards you are saying he doesn't use. How you don't see that as flawed reasoning and logic beyond me, but you are entitled to your opinion. I mean his rational for giving EVERY Priest Ungoro card 1 star was that Priest was not viable...how is it reasonable to say EVERY card is bad based on this reasoning? Undefendable, but he's a great entertainer, and he identifies as an entertainer, that's why overall I was positive of his influence towards the community.
He believes (correctly, in ny opinion) that it is ridiculous to do a rating system based on the isolated power level of a card because cards are never isolated. They always exist within the context of other cards.
That is precisely why he is so poor at card evaluation. He creates his own hypothetical meta and then judges cards based on that, with the same standards you are saying he doesn't use. How you don't see that as flawed reasoning and logic beyond me, but you are entitled to your opinion. I mean his rational for giving EVERY Priest Ungoro card 1 star was that Priest was not viable...how is it reasonable to say EVERY card is bad based on this reasoning? Undefendable, but he's a great entertainer, and he identifies as an entertainer, that's why overall I was positive of his influence towards the community.
He didn't say all of the cards were bad. He said none of them would see play, which is the whole point.
Like I said, he isn't rating how good the cards are. He's rating how much play they'll see because that is one of the only falsifiable way of rating cards and by extension the only scientifically valid way of rating the cards.
(EDIT: Let me clarify that by falsifiable I basically mean testable. Trump's rating system is the only system in which you can definitively and objectively test whether or not his predictions were accurate.)
I like him because he's clever, he cites numbers, he's positive, he's usually in a good mood when he streams, and he's just overall really likable. That's most important to me
"I have seen worlds bathed in the Makers' flames, their denizens fading without as much as a whimper. Entire planetary systems born and razed in the time that it takes your mortal hearts to beat once. Yet all throughout, my own heart devoid of emotion... of empathy. I. Have. Felt. Nothing. A million-million lives wasted. Had they all held within them your tenacity? Had they all loved life as you do?"
Trump is one of the worst things happend to the world the past years. No president in history was lying more than he does. Why do the people from all over the world tend more and more to stupid populism? I hate that.
To your question. Some people say he is the best. Why? I never got that. I think people who belive in Trump are just stupid. There is absolutly no reason to think different. And the worst is that people don’t like to accept that he is wrong and they got cought by populism. So there are still many people who are fighting for him. I don’t get it.
But like I said. It is a global problem. Populism. Fight that by informing yourself. And don’t do that by facebook or twitter. Thanks to the algorithms you might be missleaded.
Ahh and by the way. Everyone who says there are fake news is stupid as well. All the bad things about Trump are true.
Wow, did you really create a new account just to attack the almighty Mr. President Donald Trump and his followers in a forum about Hearthstone??? Ridiculous!!!
Did.. he just... insulted the GOD EMPEROR OF MANKIND???
He believes (correctly, in ny opinion) that it is ridiculous to do a rating system based on the isolated power level of a card because cards are never isolated. They always exist within the context of other cards.
That is precisely why he is so poor at card evaluation. He creates his own hypothetical meta and then judges cards based on that, with the same standards you are saying he doesn't use. How you don't see that as flawed reasoning and logic beyond me, but you are entitled to your opinion. I mean his rational for giving EVERY Priest Ungoro card 1 star was that Priest was not viable...how is it reasonable to say EVERY card is bad based on this reasoning? Undefendable, but he's a great entertainer, and he identifies as an entertainer, that's why overall I was positive of his influence towards the community.
I wrote on this at length on a thread when he did his last review but here it is:
What Trump tries to do is evaluate the cards in actual Standard laddering play within the next expansion. If there were 0 mechs in Standard and Blizz printed a 10 mana card that said "If there is a mech on the field, win the game," would you rate the card great? Of course not. The condition is impossible to meet within the meta. On a more realistic level, Golakka Crawler is a card no one uses anymore, and no one would even put it into their deck anymore since it's basically a River Crocolisk. On the other hand when MSoG was still in rotation and Pirate Warrior was in full flow, it was basically in every deck (including Pirate Warrior). See how relevant meta information is to the rating of a card?
If all Priest had were 10 mana cards, it wouldn't matter that Priest had a 10 mana card that said "win the game," printed because there wouldn't be a Priest deck. That's the idea behind the Un'goro ratings. If you can't make a functioning Priest deck with that card included that can play against the meta decks currently in the meta, it doesn't matter WHAT cards Priest gets because they will never ever see play (Grimestreet Protector is a great example of a card that imo was Constructed viable but never saw any play because there wasn't a deck that could use it effectively).
You say he creates his own hypothetical meta; that is exactly what has to be done to predict things, and it's not based on just randomness, but the previous meta, and the new cards and the new decks that will create. People laugh and call it a "crystal ball meta," but he actually lays it out in his Boomsday video that he'd theorycrafted a certain deck and found it would not work. Now sometimes he gets those predictions wrong (Test Subject is a great example of a deck which Trump thought was going to be Constructed viable which is why he rated it 5 stars, only to whiff), but you are only human, you can make these mistakes. And on the whole he was correct. Defile and BR Guldan despite being OP never saw play throughout KotFT because Warlock didnt have the late game and demons to successfully support the kind of deck that would fit into.
In fact, in my opinion, rating a card based on its objective power level is the more "crystal ball" - there are plenty of decks and cards that weren't given enough support and died out, like Dragon Paladin with Dragon Consort, Nightbane Templar, Elemental Shaman; how do YOU know that Blizz is going to print enough support for your "amazing card in a vacuum with no support" card? That's the REAL crystal ball, because while Trump is at least going off of real existing cards and metas(and the previous meta is important because if a certain deck can't beat out decks in a previous meta it won't exist), you are mind-reading Blizzard and saying this card will receive enough support in the future for it to be viable.
His card reviews are generally on point if you remember that he is only predicting for the next expansion only (so don't dust things in case they get a futire expansion). He is also a good player if you are new and want educational content,particularly if you want a slow midrange or control deck. You should probably not watch him if you want to learn a combo deck (he's too slow).
First, this forum is called Hearthpwn, not Hearthstone. Second, how the hell didn't you notice you were using a different account before posting? And third, no, you didn't have to comment on this thread, because it is not about Donald Trump and political discussions are not allowed here.
He isn’t bad but he is not the best either. I feel like he used to be better in the past though.
I used to like him alot, tho he is not good - in sense ur asking. He is easily belove 0.1%, but that makes 100000 of us.
His biggest advantages is being the first one to play beta, that didnt come from his personality nor skill
Saying he isn’t good is kinda preposterous
Was thinking the same thing, the mayor of value town has a huge heart for sure and he's always thanking his followers on twitch. He's pretty cool to watch and I like how he keeps it PG salty as I don't think I can name you another PG salty player but then Kolento came to mind. He's a good player to watch too.
I haven’t watched his stream in a while but I am pretty sure he is a consistent Legend player still, isn’t he? So he is at the very least pretty decent and way above average.
He's a funny guy that ensures I always have things to watch on youtube in the morning. The occasional shenanigans are great. What's not to like? You can't really blame him for the blatant selling out either. I mean, isn't it normal and human to want to make money when the opportunities arise?
Oh ... this thread is about the hearthstone streamer ... whoops :P
Legend with : S65 Freeze Mage, S57 Maly Gonk Druid, S57 "Okay" Shaman, S53 Boom-zooka Hunter, S53 Maly Tog Druid, S52 Wild Tog Druid ft.Blingtron, S50 Quest Rogue, S49 Dead Man's Warrior, S41 Wild Clown Fiesta Druid, S41 Hadronox Jade Druid, S40 Wild OTK Dragon Druid, S35 SMOrc Shaman, S33 Jade Druid, S22 Control Priest, S19 Control Priest
Let's get some shoutouts for Kolento, one of the best chill Hearthstone streams that features high level gameplay; I've had Kolento lull me into naps many times and I mean that as a high compliment.
If you thought you knew what you think I know, then you'd know I knew you knew I know.
He's a terrible card reviewer.. seems like his popularity has really waned this year.
I disagree. I think although his analysis on many cards have been well off the mark on many an occasion, his reasoning is well founded. Let’s take what most people take to be the most egregious example, his analysis of Warlock’s KotFT cards (and this actually ties into some confusions people have about his rating system).
Trumps rating system is not based on the individual strength of a card. He believes (correctly, in ny opinion) that it is ridiculous to do a rating system based on the isolated power level of a card because cards are never isolated. They always exist within the context of other cards. In addition, when you make a claim about a card that’s based on pure powerlevel it’s impossible to ever actually prove it wrong since no matter what happens you can just say “the conditions aren’t right for it.” For this reason Trump designed a rating system which does not attempt to say how good the card is but instead only tries to predict the amount of play it sees. As trump admits, this makes his rating system much riskier as you can actually prove him wrong or right once the cards come out.
Now onto his Warlock predictions. Prior to Frozen Throne, Warlock was in such a bad shape that Trump believed that it was probably impossible for one set to pull Warlock out of the dumpster no matter how good the cards it got were. As it turned out, Warlock got some pretty crazy cards in Throne and Trump acknowledged this in his review. His assertion was that there still wasn’t a way for Warlocks to win games despite all of the insanely powerful defense tools they got (which he actually said were insanely powerful) since they didn’t have any kind of reliable wincon. The reason he was wrong was because practically everyone reviewing the set, including him, underestimated the independent strength of Bloodreaver Gul’Dan. Gul’dan is so good that you could make a serious arguement that Warlock wouldn’t see play right now we’re it not for Gul’dan, which actually means that we’re it not for Gul’Dan, all of Trumps other predictions on the Warlock cards would have been correct as none of them would see any play because Warlock would not see any play.
That is precisely why he is so poor at card evaluation. He creates his own hypothetical meta and then judges cards based on that, with the same standards you are saying he doesn't use. How you don't see that as flawed reasoning and logic beyond me, but you are entitled to your opinion. I mean his rational for giving EVERY Priest Ungoro card 1 star was that Priest was not viable...how is it reasonable to say EVERY card is bad based on this reasoning? Undefendable, but he's a great entertainer, and he identifies as an entertainer, that's why overall I was positive of his influence towards the community.
If you thought you knew what you think I know, then you'd know I knew you knew I know.
Trump? Jens needs our appreciation!
He didn't say all of the cards were bad. He said none of them would see play, which is the whole point.
Like I said, he isn't rating how good the cards are. He's rating how much play they'll see because that is one of the only falsifiable way of rating cards and by extension the only scientifically valid way of rating the cards.
(EDIT: Let me clarify that by falsifiable I basically mean testable. Trump's rating system is the only system in which you can definitively and objectively test whether or not his predictions were accurate.)
I like him because he's clever, he cites numbers, he's positive, he's usually in a good mood when he streams, and he's just overall really likable. That's most important to me
I like him too. I was watching his stream about the reveals and my wife says , 'the guy talking is a huge nerd' so probably a good thing.
Free to try and find a game, dealing cards for sorrow, cards for pain.
He's better than most but way too greedy to be taken seriously, much like amaz
Did.. he just... insulted the GOD EMPEROR OF MANKIND???
I wrote on this at length on a thread when he did his last review but here it is:
What Trump tries to do is evaluate the cards in actual Standard laddering play within the next expansion. If there were 0 mechs in Standard and Blizz printed a 10 mana card that said "If there is a mech on the field, win the game," would you rate the card great? Of course not. The condition is impossible to meet within the meta. On a more realistic level, Golakka Crawler is a card no one uses anymore, and no one would even put it into their deck anymore since it's basically a River Crocolisk. On the other hand when MSoG was still in rotation and Pirate Warrior was in full flow, it was basically in every deck (including Pirate Warrior). See how relevant meta information is to the rating of a card?
If all Priest had were 10 mana cards, it wouldn't matter that Priest had a 10 mana card that said "win the game," printed because there wouldn't be a Priest deck. That's the idea behind the Un'goro ratings. If you can't make a functioning Priest deck with that card included that can play against the meta decks currently in the meta, it doesn't matter WHAT cards Priest gets because they will never ever see play (Grimestreet Protector is a great example of a card that imo was Constructed viable but never saw any play because there wasn't a deck that could use it effectively).
You say he creates his own hypothetical meta; that is exactly what has to be done to predict things, and it's not based on just randomness, but the previous meta, and the new cards and the new decks that will create. People laugh and call it a "crystal ball meta," but he actually lays it out in his Boomsday video that he'd theorycrafted a certain deck and found it would not work. Now sometimes he gets those predictions wrong (Test Subject is a great example of a deck which Trump thought was going to be Constructed viable which is why he rated it 5 stars, only to whiff), but you are only human, you can make these mistakes. And on the whole he was correct. Defile and BR Guldan despite being OP never saw play throughout KotFT because Warlock didnt have the late game and demons to successfully support the kind of deck that would fit into.
In fact, in my opinion, rating a card based on its objective power level is the more "crystal ball" - there are plenty of decks and cards that weren't given enough support and died out, like Dragon Paladin with Dragon Consort, Nightbane Templar, Elemental Shaman; how do YOU know that Blizz is going to print enough support for your "amazing card in a vacuum with no support" card? That's the REAL crystal ball, because while Trump is at least going off of real existing cards and metas(and the previous meta is important because if a certain deck can't beat out decks in a previous meta it won't exist), you are mind-reading Blizzard and saying this card will receive enough support in the future for it to be viable.
His card reviews are generally on point if you remember that he is only predicting for the next expansion only (so don't dust things in case they get a futire expansion). He is also a good player if you are new and want educational content,particularly if you want a slow midrange or control deck. You should probably not watch him if you want to learn a combo deck (he's too slow).
This thread has been done months (years?) ago. Stealing ideas for likes is bad my friend.
EDIT: trump good first thread
Love the tribes.