Once again if your deck went from tier 1 to tier 4 or worse because of a nerf to a ONE DROP, perhaps that's a good sign that 1-drop needed to be nerfed.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Life before death. Strength before weakness. Journey before destination.
You explained the reason why they nerfed it: they don't want the same archetype existing in mostly the same form to exist eternally. Even in wild, it can get boring
*Coughzoolockcough*
*Ahemamememcontrollockamem*
*Cackalackalackalack... aggropally*
Oh excuse me, I just had a bad case of Blizzard inconsistency, and no it's not treatable. Want a hug? ;)
I like how people that don't play wild demand that this card pe HoF'ed, as a wild player do you think we like this here?
And the answer is NO we do not like snowbolling 1 drops that wins the game on turn 1.
Mage has lost one of its main archetypes but that doesn't mean it can find more.
I often see people complaining about cards being too powerful that are not being nerfed and the conclusion is "Don't worry it will be in wild in x months" which is comforting for standard players but how do you think wild players feel about that?
I play wild and I have a full collection.
So no, you're wrong.
That answer has nothing to do with what larryvarza said
He implied that only people who don't play wild wants Mana Wyrm to be HoF. This is false, I do play wild and I want the card to be HoF'd
I like how people that don't play wild demand that this card pe HoF'ed, as a wild player do you think we like this here?
And the answer is NO we do not like snowbolling 1 drops that wins the game on turn 1.
Mage has lost one of its main archetypes but that doesn't mean it can find more.
I often see people complaining about cards being too powerful that are not being nerfed and the conclusion is "Don't worry it will be in wild in x months" which is comforting for standard players but how do you think wild players feel about that?
I play wild and I have a full collection.
So no, you're wrong.
That answer has nothing to do with what larryvarza said
He implied that only people who don't play wild wants Mana Wyrm to be HoF. This is false, I do play wild and I want the card to be HoF'd
and have all the colletion matter because...why? ....i'm a wild player aswell, and i do prefer the nerf instead, just because you prefer the HoF it doesn't mean every one who thinks the nerf is better is wrong. 1 Drops like mana wyrn shouldn't exist as strong as it was.
I like how people that don't play wild demand that this card pe HoF'ed, as a wild player do you think we like this here?
And the answer is NO we do not like snowbolling 1 drops that wins the game on turn 1.
Mage has lost one of its main archetypes but that doesn't mean it can find more.
I often see people complaining about cards being too powerful that are not being nerfed and the conclusion is "Don't worry it will be in wild in x months" which is comforting for standard players but how do you think wild players feel about that?
I play wild and I have a full collection.
So no, you're wrong.
That answer has nothing to do with what larryvarza said
He implied that only people who don't play wild wants Mana Wyrm to be HoF. This is false, I do play wild and I want the card to be HoF'd
and have all the colletion matter because...why? ....i'm a wild player aswell, and i do prefer the nerf instead, just because you prefer the HoF it doesn't mean every one who thinks the nerf is better is wrong. 1 Drops like mana wyrn shouldn't exist as strong as it was.
What are you talking about dude ? I never said everyone who thinks the nerf is better is wrong.. the guy I quoted implied that I didn't play wild because I was asking for HoF instead of nerf, which was wrong because I do actually play wild and even added that I have a full collection to show that I play a lot of wild, not just a little.
Why did they have to nerf Mana Wyrm instead of putting it in the HoF ?
They killed an archetype that existed since the beginning of HS (Tempo Mage) meanwhile Shaman still has Tunnel Trogg .. which is arguably stronger.
I despise blizzard for killing classic cards, put them in the freaking HoF instead.. I don't mind nerfs like Giggling because it's from a new expansion but MANA WYRM... the lil dude has been around for years.
Thoughts ?
Seems like a salty rant from an inexperienced player.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Once again if your deck went from tier 1 to tier 4 or worse because of a nerf to a ONE DROP, perhaps that's a good sign that 1-drop needed to be nerfed.
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
*Coughzoolockcough*
*Ahemamememcontrollockamem*
*Cackalackalackalack... aggropally*
Oh excuse me, I just had a bad case of Blizzard inconsistency, and no it's not treatable. Want a hug? ;)
He implied that only people who don't play wild wants Mana Wyrm to be HoF. This is false, I do play wild and I want the card to be HoF'd
and have all the colletion matter because...why? ....i'm a wild player aswell, and i do prefer the nerf instead, just because you prefer the HoF it doesn't mean every one who thinks the nerf is better is wrong. 1 Drops like mana wyrn shouldn't exist as strong as it was.
Wait there wild players lmao that a joke right
What are you talking about dude ? I never said everyone who thinks the nerf is better is wrong.. the guy I quoted implied that I didn't play wild because I was asking for HoF instead of nerf, which was wrong because I do actually play wild and even added that I have a full collection to show that I play a lot of wild, not just a little.
Seems like a salty rant from an inexperienced player.