Keleseth Zoolock just eats up Druids for dessert, try that if you want, it's a cheap deck too. Here's the general balance of things in the current meta:
Control Warrior -beats- Any Aggro deck, really
Togwaggle/Mill Druid -beats- Control Warrior
Deathrattle Hunter/Rogue -beats- Control Warrior
Odd Rogue/Paladin -beats- Any Mage (it can beat every deck, but mainly shits on Mage)
I played togwaggle druid to r5 this season. I must say, it beats control every time as I can't remember the last one that beat me, but still wins against deathrattle hunter a decent amount. It all depends when they draw their eggs, cubes, whelps, and rexxar, and when you draw good removal.
Hitting rank 2 or 3 does not guarantee hitting legend. It simply means you have the skillset necessary to do so. you still have to put in the games.
Hitting rank 2 or 3 doesn't mean you have the skillset necessary to get to legend, it means you have the skillset necessary to get to rank 2-3. If your winrate levels off to 50/50 at rank 2-3 then you won't get any higher regardless of how many games you play.
Hitting rank 2 or 3 does not guarantee hitting legend. It simply means you have the skillset necessary to do so. you still have to put in the games.
Hitting rank 2 or 3 doesn't mean you have the skillset necessary to get to legend, it means you have the skillset necessary to get to rank 2-3. If your winrate levels off to 50/50 at rank 2-3 then you won't get any higher regardless of how many games you play.
No kidding. Let me be perfectly clear here. Hitting Rank 2-3 does not mean you will hit legend. Let me restate exactly what I mean since there is massive confusion for some reason:
The skills needed to go from Rank 2-3 to Legend are absolutely the same as the skills needed to hit that rank in the first place. You know how to play around things, how to play your deck sufficiently well, probably what tech cards to use and why, how to adjust to the local meta, how to play around your opponent's likely holdings, etc.
Is that still too confusing? Maybe this is why "9 deckslots is confusing to new players" was a real thing.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Life before death. Strength before weakness. Journey before destination.
Hitting rank 2 or 3 does not guarantee hitting legend. It simply means you have the skillset necessary to do so. you still have to put in the games.
Hitting rank 2 or 3 doesn't mean you have the skillset necessary to get to legend, it means you have the skillset necessary to get to rank 2-3. If your winrate levels off to 50/50 at rank 2-3 then you won't get any higher regardless of how many games you play.
No kidding. Let me be perfectly clear here. Hitting Rank 2-3 does not mean you will hit legend. Let me restate exactly what I mean since there is massive confusion for some reason:
The skills needed to go from Rank 2-3 to Legend are absolutely the same as the skills needed to hit that rank in the first place. You know how to play around things, how to play your deck sufficiently well, probably what tech cards to use and why, how to adjust to the local meta, how to play around your opponent's likely holdings, etc.
Is that still too confusing? Maybe this is why "9 deckslots is confusing to new players" was a real thing.
Or you just use a deck that requires you to do absolutely 0 thinking.
One of my buddy back in the days reached Legend with pirate warrior and told me he literally ONLY attacked face besides the taunt minions. He even ignored insane value trades, just to see if he'd still be able to make it.. and he did lol
Hitting rank 2 or 3 does not guarantee hitting legend. It simply means you have the skillset necessary to do so. you still have to put in the games.
Hitting rank 2 or 3 doesn't mean you have the skillset necessary to get to legend, it means you have the skillset necessary to get to rank 2-3. If your winrate levels off to 50/50 at rank 2-3 then you won't get any higher regardless of how many games you play.
The skills needed to go from Rank 2-3 to Legend are absolutely the same as the skills needed to hit that rank in the first place.
You can say that all you want, but at the end of the day it's not true. No one is confused by your comment. We all understand it, we just know it is wrong.
I must have had a vastly different experience hitting legend then.
Has everything you've said so far been based solely on your personal experience getting to legend? That explains a lot.
No it was based on me interviewing thousands and thousands of players just for the sake of this pointless thread.
No need to interview a single person really if you have a basic understanding of statistics and probability. Science generally trumps personal experience, and using already established knowledge is much more efficient than gathering your own.
Congrats on hitting Legend! :)
I'm stuck at rank3 every month since I've got legend in March, so I feel you bro.
Also congratz to OP for hitting legend. Try it again the next seasons, and next time get it even earlier. :)
I played togwaggle druid to r5 this season. I must say, it beats control every time as I can't remember the last one that beat me, but still wins against deathrattle hunter a decent amount. It all depends when they draw their eggs, cubes, whelps, and rexxar, and when you draw good removal.
Hitting rank 2 or 3 doesn't mean you have the skillset necessary to get to legend, it means you have the skillset necessary to get to rank 2-3. If your winrate levels off to 50/50 at rank 2-3 then you won't get any higher regardless of how many games you play.
No kidding. Let me be perfectly clear here. Hitting Rank 2-3 does not mean you will hit legend. Let me restate exactly what I mean since there is massive confusion for some reason:
The skills needed to go from Rank 2-3 to Legend are absolutely the same as the skills needed to hit that rank in the first place. You know how to play around things, how to play your deck sufficiently well, probably what tech cards to use and why, how to adjust to the local meta, how to play around your opponent's likely holdings, etc.
Is that still too confusing? Maybe this is why "9 deckslots is confusing to new players" was a real thing.
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
Or you just use a deck that requires you to do absolutely 0 thinking.
One of my buddy back in the days reached Legend with pirate warrior and told me he literally ONLY attacked face besides the taunt minions. He even ignored insane value trades, just to see if he'd still be able to make it.. and he did lol
That doesn't prove anything. Nice try.
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
It proves that it's possible to achieve Legend by doing no thinking whatsoever besides aiming FACE all the time.
Of course that option is only possible with very few decks.
The person I am referring to is this user https://www.hearthpwn.com/members/LiveMorph
You can ask him if you don't believe me.
You can say that all you want, but at the end of the day it's not true. No one is confused by your comment. We all understand it, we just know it is wrong.
I must have had a vastly different experience hitting legend then.
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
Has everything you've said so far been based solely on your personal experience getting to legend? That explains a lot.
No it was based on me interviewing thousands and thousands of players just for the sake of this pointless thread.
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
No need to interview a single person really if you have a basic understanding of statistics and probability. Science generally trumps personal experience, and using already established knowledge is much more efficient than gathering your own.
It's a joke. God you guys are way too serious.
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
Kaladin’s personal opinion are facts! Don’t argue with him