Blizzard is the one greedy here. They could easily give ppl dust back to remain consistent but why do that when you can be a *** to your customers. Oh well doesn't really matter. People are finally giving up on this disaster of a game anyway.
Yep, finally giving up just like they did the last 10 times people were whining and someone said everyone’s gonna give up the game.
Really though, they’re greedy for not giving a refund on something that makes almost no difference. If it was like Yogg (cause he kills himself plenty often) then I’d understand, but how often do you really have him use 20+ battlecries? At that point you’re just trying to waste your opponent’s time, and that’s something Blizz would like to avoid happening.
The card itself wasn't nerfed. The limit on battlecries doesn't affect the card in any way. If your win condition is "Shudderwock must cast more than 20 battlecries" you have a bad deck.
To be fair, Yoggs text didn't change either, just the mechanic behind. In a similar way to what happened to Jabberwocky. And Yogg gave full dust refund, iirc.
Because Yogg became a strictly worse card after the nerf, while shudderwock giving >20 battlecries really isn’t that muchof an impact. If it’s doing 20, it should be delivering lethal. If it’s not, then what the hell is your shudderwock doing?
It's not a big deal. Who cares about the precedent of "what's full dust refund-worthy and what's not". I would classify this as not full dust worthy and not even think about it lol. It's not changing something from 5/5 to 2/5 or whatever.
ore maybe some people dont have money to invested a lot and you can all say what you want but a nerf is a nerf
This isn't a nerf. The only way that the change to the animation would affect a player's play style is if they relied on the fact that Shudderwock would eat their opponent's turn, thereby winning that way... If so, then that deck is exploiting a bug. They fixed a bug, but kept the nature of the card intact.. Not a nerf.
Blizzard is the one greedy here. They could easily give ppl dust back to remain consistent but why do that when you can be a *** to your customers. Oh well doesn't really matter. People are finally giving up on this disaster of a game anyway.
Yep, finally giving up just like they did the last 10 times people were whining and someone said everyone’s gonna give up the game.
Really though, they’re greedy for not giving a refund on something that makes almost no difference. If it was like Yogg (cause he kills himself plenty often) then I’d understand, but how often do you really have him use 20+ battlecries? At that point you’re just trying to waste your opponent’s time, and that’s something Blizz would like to avoid happening.
yeaah if that was the case then stop make bad design card and go test it ;) Its not our fault that they do de job bad ??
Those saying this is a nerf, explain yourselves. How does a cap of 20 battlecries prevent you from doing what you could before, or make the card weaker?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Life before death. Strength before weakness. Journey before destination.
This isn't a nerf. The only way that the change to the animation would affect a player's play style is if they relied on the fact that Shudderwock would eat their opponent's turn, thereby winning that way... If so, then that deck is exploiting a bug. They fixed a bug, but kept the nature of the card intact.. Not a nerf.
When playing Shudderwock you could (technically) get infinite battlecries activated, now - only 20. It is a nerf, whether you like it or not. Only technically a nerf though, but still. Nerf is a nerf. You can't argue with that.
Those saying this is a nerf, explain yourselves. How does a cap of 20 battlecries prevent you from doing what you could before, or make the card weaker?
go look on internet nerf mean litterly
A decrease of the power level of a content (item, character, ability, item drop rate, etc.) in video games
so first the cap was unlimited and now is 20 so thats a decrease in power level.
and what i prevents it prevents to play more then 20 battlecries
It could do 21+ battlecries before, now it cannot. That is a nerf.
It is a nerf that doesn't actually affect the cards strength in any meaningful way, however. I wouldn't mind some free dust because it was in the first pack I opened but the card isn't weaker in any of the ways it is actually used, just a nerf on paper so I understand the no refund.
Those saying this is a nerf, explain yourselves. How does a cap of 20 battlecries prevent you from doing what you could before, or make the card weaker?
Uhh... Don't you understand? It's not about HOW it was changed, it is about the fact that it WAS changed. And technically it is a nerf.
Explain how this change is a nerf, specifically in terms of what Shudderwock does for your deck's gameplan, not generally in terms of the definition of a nerf.
edit: every minute change does not warrant free dust.
It is a nerf, but it does not change the strength of the card or the effect in any significant way. The reason they give refunds is for people who craft a card for a deck and all the sudden the card changes in a significant way and they have no more reason to play that card anymore. Seeing as how this nerf isn't significant enough to make that happen it really doesn't deserve a full dust refund.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Ha, if you crafted Shudderwock for this purpose, you deserve to lose your dust.
Free to try and find a game, dealing cards for sorrow, cards for pain.
And for the people that say it is not a nerf
nerf -To weaken or make less dangerous
also people sayinh that the nerf dont mind if thats the case why do it just for fun XD
SO YEAH DEFFINTLY A NERF
It's battlecry is limited to 20, so yes, it's a nerf, read patch notes next time.
Its not our fault that they do de job bad ??
Those saying this is a nerf, explain yourselves. How does a cap of 20 battlecries prevent you from doing what you could before, or make the card weaker?
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
Greedy bois
Unpopular opinion: Rogue is OP
It is such a small nerf.
Nerf
New Word Suggestion(n) A decrease of the power level of a content (item, character, ability, item drop rate, etc.) in video games
idk whether or not is should get a dust refund but did yog get a refund when they changed so he was capped at 30 spells and if he dies then it stops?
if so I think it is a similar "nerf" (please mind the quotations im not biased or anythin)
Kobolds are almost as bad as goblins, they gotta die (⌐■_■)–︻╦╤─
I want dust.
*dischants card
hey dust.
Do or do not. There is no try.
go look on internet nerf mean litterly
and what i prevents it prevents to play more then 20 battlecries
It could do 21+ battlecries before, now it cannot. That is a nerf.
It is a nerf that doesn't actually affect the cards strength in any meaningful way, however. I wouldn't mind some free dust because it was in the first pack I opened but the card isn't weaker in any of the ways it is actually used, just a nerf on paper so I understand the no refund.
change != nerf
Explain how this change is a nerf, specifically in terms of what Shudderwock does for your deck's gameplan, not generally in terms of the definition of a nerf.
edit: every minute change does not warrant free dust.
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
It is a nerf, but it does not change the strength of the card or the effect in any significant way. The reason they give refunds is for people who craft a card for a deck and all the sudden the card changes in a significant way and they have no more reason to play that card anymore. Seeing as how this nerf isn't significant enough to make that happen it really doesn't deserve a full dust refund.