I am still holding out hope for a new Sylvanas legendary, but the chances seem slim now. I’m not overly familiar with WoW lore, but doesn’t she have strong ties to Gilneas?
Do you meqn the character or the sort of power she has?
her card ability was removed from standard due to possible synergy abuse.
As for her as a character though, I’d be happy to see a new version of her maybe. The precedent is set with other cards having different versions of themselves like Ragnaros and Hemmet
I don't think the chances are that bad. She's one of the most iconic, lore-heavy characters in WoW. She deserves to be represented in Standard.
Maybe they are waiting until they come up with a new plan for how to deal with the Classic set. The fact that they have to keep removing cards from it tells me their original plan to keep all of Classic evergreen is simply not working.
Once they can figure that out, maybe they can introduce a few new cards to the new incarnation of Classic, however that turns out.
Sylvanas is the arch-enemy of Gilneas, after the demise of the Scourge: she tried to conquer the kingdom.
Also, as a banshee queen, she'd fit very well with the theme of Witchwood.
I'd love a reverse version of her in the same way as Ragnaros the Lightlord became a thing, a restored version of a living Sylvanas made possible by a powerful illusion.
Do you meqn the character or the sort of power she has?
her card ability was removed from standard due to possible synergy abuse.
As for her as a character though, I’d be happy to see a new version of her maybe. The precedent is set with other cards having different versions of themselves like Ragnaros and Hemmet
I mean a different variation. Like Ragnarok, Deathwing and Elise.
Sylvanas is the arch-enemy of Gilneas, after the demise of the Scourge: she tried to conquer the kingdom.
Also, as a banshee queen, she'd fit very well with the theme of Witchwood.
I'd love a reverse version of her in the same way as Ragnaros the Lightlord became a thing, a restored version of a living Sylvanas made possible by a powerful illusion.
But her living version is not related with gilneas. Weren't Windrunner Village around Ghostlands iirc?
It was related to Lich King and they missed that opportunity to bring her back with KotFT.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Memedeck-seeker. Always tries to build new decks. Hates tournements, streamers, netdecks and poor-o players. ah, but a tournement mode could be great !!!
Simplest explanation:Good vers. Sylvanas would fit in koft expansion since heroes are became death knights,expansion released and we didn't see her.
Genn and Sylvanas are nemesis but i think sylvanas in kalimdor right now and it is too far away from witchwoods.If some worgen vs. undead theme she definitely would present.
Sylvanas is the arch-enemy of Gilneas, after the demise of the Scourge: she tried to conquer the kingdom.
Also, as a banshee queen, she'd fit very well with the theme of Witchwood.
I'd love a reverse version of her in the same way as Ragnaros the Lightlord became a thing, a restored version of a living Sylvanas made possible by a powerful illusion.
But her living version is not related with gilneas. Weren't Windrunner Village around Ghostlands iirc?
It was related to Lich King and they missed that opportunity to bring her back with KotFT.
Yes, she's from Ghostlands.
But Hagatha may have cast some witchery upon her, while she was secretly wandering and spying around Gilneas... who knows? It's not hard to fit her in this expansion.
Sylvanas is the arch-enemy of Gilneas, after the demise of the Scourge: she tried to conquer the kingdom.
Also, as a banshee queen, she'd fit very well with the theme of Witchwood.
I'd love a reverse version of her in the same way as Ragnaros the Lightlord became a thing, a restored version of a living Sylvanas made possible by a powerful illusion.
But her living version is not related with gilneas. Weren't Windrunner Village around Ghostlands iirc?
It was related to Lich King and they missed that opportunity to bring her back with KotFT.
Yes, she's from Ghostlands.
But Hagatha may have cast some witchery upon her, while she was secretly wandering and spying around Gilneas... who knows? It's not hard to fit her in this expansion.
tbh, That sounds childish to me.
I always hated when Hearthstone tried to change lore, "Ragnaros, the Lightlord" was a shame in my opinion but how they do with hemet and elise was quite well. They must follow that rotation. They should not change the Warcraft's own lore.
And being a banshee queen doesn't fit the "Witch" theme. Witchcraft is a different thing.
Memedeck-seeker. Always tries to build new decks. Hates tournements, streamers, netdecks and poor-o players. ah, but a tournement mode could be great !!!
Sylvanas is the arch-enemy of Gilneas, after the demise of the Scourge: she tried to conquer the kingdom.
Also, as a banshee queen, she'd fit very well with the theme of Witchwood.
I'd love a reverse version of her in the same way as Ragnaros the Lightlord became a thing, a restored version of a living Sylvanas made possible by a powerful illusion.
But her living version is not related with gilneas. Weren't Windrunner Village around Ghostlands iirc?
It was related to Lich King and they missed that opportunity to bring her back with KotFT.
Yes, she's from Ghostlands.
But Hagatha may have cast some witchery upon her, while she was secretly wandering and spying around Gilneas... who knows? It's not hard to fit her in this expansion.
tbh, That sounds childish to me.
I always hated when Hearthstone tried to change lore, "Ragnaros, the Lightlord" was a shame in my opinion but how they do with hemet and elise was quite well. They must follow that rotation. They should not change the Warcraft's own lore.
And being a banshee queen doesn't fit the "Witch" theme. Witchcraft is a different thing.
The whole Warcraft lore is extremely childish, despite the heroic nuances here and there.
Also, Lady in White is a banshee as well, obviously. An illusion cast upon (or against, as a vision) Sylvanas would be pretty fitting and would not clash with current lore at all. Perfectly in tune with the expansion.
What you're trying to bring as a point is actually a matter of personal taste. ;)
Sylvanas is the arch-enemy of Gilneas, after the demise of the Scourge: she tried to conquer the kingdom.
Also, as a banshee queen, she'd fit very well with the theme of Witchwood.
I'd love a reverse version of her in the same way as Ragnaros the Lightlord became a thing, a restored version of a living Sylvanas made possible by a powerful illusion.
But her living version is not related with gilneas. Weren't Windrunner Village around Ghostlands iirc?
It was related to Lich King and they missed that opportunity to bring her back with KotFT.
Yes, she's from Ghostlands.
But Hagatha may have cast some witchery upon her, while she was secretly wandering and spying around Gilneas... who knows? It's not hard to fit her in this expansion.
tbh, That sounds childish to me.
I always hated when Hearthstone tried to change lore, "Ragnaros, the Lightlord" was a shame in my opinion but how they do with hemet and elise was quite well. They must follow that rotation. They should not change the Warcraft's own lore.
And being a banshee queen doesn't fit the "Witch" theme. Witchcraft is a different thing.
The whole Warcraft lore is extremely childish, despite the heroic nuances here and there.
Also, Lady in White is a banshee as well, obviously. An illusion cast upon (or against, as a vision) Sylvanas would be pretty fitting and would not clash with current lore at all. Perfectly in tune with the expansion.
What you're trying to bring as a point is actually a matter of personal taste. ;)
Yeah, That's a personal taste but Lady in White isn't a banshee. She is a ghost.
Memedeck-seeker. Always tries to build new decks. Hates tournements, streamers, netdecks and poor-o players. ah, but a tournement mode could be great !!!
Sylvanas is the arch-enemy of Gilneas, after the demise of the Scourge: she tried to conquer the kingdom.
Also, as a banshee queen, she'd fit very well with the theme of Witchwood.
I'd love a reverse version of her in the same way as Ragnaros the Lightlord became a thing, a restored version of a living Sylvanas made possible by a powerful illusion.
But her living version is not related with gilneas. Weren't Windrunner Village around Ghostlands iirc?
It was related to Lich King and they missed that opportunity to bring her back with KotFT.
Yes, she's from Ghostlands.
But Hagatha may have cast some witchery upon her, while she was secretly wandering and spying around Gilneas... who knows? It's not hard to fit her in this expansion.
tbh, That sounds childish to me.
I always hated when Hearthstone tried to change lore, "Ragnaros, the Lightlord" was a shame in my opinion but how they do with hemet and elise was quite well. They must follow that rotation. They should not change the Warcraft's own lore.
And being a banshee queen doesn't fit the "Witch" theme. Witchcraft is a different thing.
The whole Warcraft lore is extremely childish, despite the heroic nuances here and there.
Also, Lady in White is a banshee as well, obviously. An illusion cast upon (or against, as a vision) Sylvanas would be pretty fitting and would not clash with current lore at all. Perfectly in tune with the expansion.
What you're trying to bring as a point is actually a matter of personal taste. ;)
Yeah, That's a personal taste but Lady in White isn't a banshee. She is a ghost.
I'm not disputing, Just correcting your mistakes and I like to discuss about lore.
Anyway, It is your decision. I have to respect that. Good day .
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Memedeck-seeker. Always tries to build new decks. Hates tournements, streamers, netdecks and poor-o players. ah, but a tournement mode could be great !!!
I'm not disputing, Just correcting your mistakes and I like to discuss about lore.
Anyway, It is your decision. I have to respect that. Good day .
Uhm ok. I didn't mean to sound rude, sorry. I just had the impression we were just quibbling for the sake of it.
The point is that you can't really distinguish a Banshee from a Ghost from an image. So, yeah, she may be a ghost, but she may very well be a banshee too.
Actually, there is no clear-cut definition that marks a difference between a banshee and a ghost. Actually, a banshee is just an annoying and screaming and powerful ghost, isn't it?
And if a lady in white can fit the Witchwood, so can Sylvanas, in an altered or subverted form.
I respect the fact you don't like it, but there's really nothing that can undoubtedly say she does not fit, also given past and current trends in card design (Ragnaros, Lightlord, but even Emeriss, and Duskfallen Aviana, etc).
Also, i like warcraft lore, very much, but i am well aware it is a clever mixture of serious and childish (or over-simplified, if you prefer) elements.
I am still holding out hope for a new Sylvanas legendary, but the chances seem slim now. I’m not overly familiar with WoW lore, but doesn’t she have strong ties to Gilneas?
Do you meqn the character or the sort of power she has?
her card ability was removed from standard due to possible synergy abuse.
As for her as a character though, I’d be happy to see a new version of her maybe. The precedent is set with other cards having different versions of themselves like Ragnaros and Hemmet
OP probably meant a new Sylvanas, similar to Elise versions. I'd like new Sylv as well, always liked the character and I dig them looks :V
I've no clue what I'm doing...
I don't think the chances are that bad. She's one of the most iconic, lore-heavy characters in WoW. She deserves to be represented in Standard.
Maybe they are waiting until they come up with a new plan for how to deal with the Classic set. The fact that they have to keep removing cards from it tells me their original plan to keep all of Classic evergreen is simply not working.
Once they can figure that out, maybe they can introduce a few new cards to the new incarnation of Classic, however that turns out.
"Why, you never expected justice from a company, did you? They have neither a soul to lose nor a body to kick." -- Lady Saba Holland
Sylvanas is the arch-enemy of Gilneas, after the demise of the Scourge: she tried to conquer the kingdom.
Also, as a banshee queen, she'd fit very well with the theme of Witchwood.
I'd love a reverse version of her in the same way as Ragnaros the Lightlord became a thing, a restored version of a living Sylvanas made possible by a powerful illusion.
The new mage legendary that has just been revealed can give you a Sylvanas if you're lucky enough. xD
Rumors are carried by haters, spread by fools, and accepted by idiots.
It was related to Lich King and they missed that opportunity to bring her back with KotFT.
Memedeck-seeker. Always tries to build new decks. Hates tournements, streamers, netdecks and poor-o players.
ah, but a tournement mode could be great !!!
Simplest explanation:Good vers. Sylvanas would fit in koft expansion since heroes are became death knights,expansion released and we didn't see her.
Genn and Sylvanas are nemesis but i think sylvanas in kalimdor right now and it is too far away from witchwoods.If some worgen vs. undead theme she definitely would present.
Miracle miracle miracle...
I always hated when Hearthstone tried to change lore, "Ragnaros, the Lightlord" was a shame in my opinion but how they do with hemet and elise was quite well. They must follow that rotation. They should not change the Warcraft's own lore.
And being a banshee queen doesn't fit the "Witch" theme. Witchcraft is a different thing.
Memedeck-seeker. Always tries to build new decks. Hates tournements, streamers, netdecks and poor-o players.
ah, but a tournement mode could be great !!!
https://wow.gamepedia.com/Ghost
https://wow.gamepedia.com/Banshee
Also Wow's Lore isn't Childish, Are you sure You know the lore well ?
Memedeck-seeker. Always tries to build new decks. Hates tournements, streamers, netdecks and poor-o players.
ah, but a tournement mode could be great !!!
I'm not disputing, Just correcting your mistakes and I like to discuss about lore.
Anyway, It is your decision. I have to respect that. Good day .
Memedeck-seeker. Always tries to build new decks. Hates tournements, streamers, netdecks and poor-o players.
ah, but a tournement mode could be great !!!