Hearthpwn

Quote from Stock_speaketh >>

 

Quote from DoubleSummon >>

 if rebuke is insane as people say ALL wild decks would run a 1.5 mana 5/5  

 Do you even Wild bro? Its LITERALLY SECOND MOST USED LEGENDARY AFTER N'ZOTH look at the stats -

https://hsreplay.net/cards/#gameType=RANKED_WILD&sortBy=includedPopularity

 

Quote from DoubleSummon >>

 Lady in White is a strong card, just. that there isn't really a deck for her yet

 You know, sometimes you get cards you cant really fit in existing archetypes. Like, i dunno, Skull of man'ari or Dragon's Fury

Let's give this expac a chance before overreacting

Quote from maroon5five >>

Lady in White is really powerful, but you have to build a deck around it that isn't very good unless you draw her. She sounds like Mistcaller which was insane in theory, but not very good in practice. Lord Godfrey is good, but warlock already has a ton of board clears so one of those will likely get taken out to fit him, and that won't increase the powerlevel of the deck enough to scream OP yet. Remember that control warlock is losing N'Zoth which is a huge hit, and cubelock doesn't usually run the expensive board clears that Lord Godfrey would likely take the place of.

Quote from DoubleSummon >>

  Alright turns out a rebuke effect on a body is pretty good, didn't knew the actual stats, knew loatheb is still good though. rebuke isn't that good though cause it doesn't have a body attached and is more of a tech card, rather than just a solid good card, not like loatheb

Where were you when they announced Kharazan and MsoG? And did you also cry about patches, call to arms, etc??

Even if I love aggro players crying - I hate when people think they can evaluate/ critizise a meta that hasn't even arrived. You did not even think about the upcomming rotation. 

And I think blizzard has A LOT more information about what the majority of the players want than you have. Plus they have A LOT more information about the most played and most oppressive decks. BTW: Did you even check the tier 1 decks before your simplistic rant?

Stop with your clickbait titles and start crying when there actually is a new meta ffs. 

Quote from Kronsi >>

Where were you when they announced Kharazan and MsoG? And did you also cry about patches, call to arms, etc??

Even if I love aggro players crying - I hate when people think they can evaluate/ critizise a meta that hasn't even arrived. You did not even think about the upcomming rotation. 

And I think blizzard has A LOT more information about what the majority of the players want than you have. Plus they have A LOT more information about the most played and most oppressive decks. BTW: Did you even check the tier 1 decks before your simplistic rant?

Stop with your clickbait titles and start crying when there actually is a new meta ffs. 

 

Quote from WhistlerFI >>

 

Quote from maroon5five >>

Lady in White is really powerful, but you have to build a deck around it that isn't very good unless you draw her. She sounds like Mistcaller which was insane in theory, but not very good in practice. Lord Godfrey is good, but warlock already has a ton of board clears so one of those will likely get taken out to fit him, and that won't increase the powerlevel of the deck enough to scream OP yet. Remember that control warlock is losing N'Zoth which is a huge hit, and cubelock doesn't usually run the expensive board clears that Lord Godfrey would likely take the place of.

What makes you think that you have to build deck to support Lady?

I prefer more such an approach that I have strong deck which Lady makes even stronger... and deck is not fully dependapble of drawing her.

So Lady supports my deck, not the other way around. 

 

Quote from gate7stam >>

the death of aggro is the death of hearthstone people dont want to play 40 min games!!

can we stop with the rants already? the expansion isn't even out yet, nor have we seen all the cards ... how the fuck do you guys want to know what the meta will be like or if a card is powerful or not? everybody though cabal lakey would suck, yet is is played in every warlock deck. just be patient and actually see how good the cards/classes/decks will be then you can still go on rants afterwards ...

Ok, I see that some of you don't get how card game sets are made. No worries, I've got your back :)

Sets in card games are usually made months, if not (in case of MtG) years, in advance. So, by the time that last year's meta was forming, I guess either Un'Goro or KotF, this set was already made. This is why it seems to you like they're not keeping up with the current meta.

Quote from Stock_speaketh >>

 

Quote from DoubleSummon >>

  Alright turns out a rebuke effect on a body is pretty good, didn't knew the actual stats, knew loatheb is still good though. rebuke isn't that good though cause it doesn't have a body attached and is more of a tech card, rather than just a solid good card, not like loatheb

 Dude. Ok i ll make it easier. Imagine playing Murloc pally. 5 mana. You either play vanilla 5/5 and get Loatheb effect, or you paying for this effect 2 mana and playing Coldlight Seer or Murloc Warleader which are murlocs and actually have synergy with the rest of the deck . Which one is better, let me think, hmmmmmm

 

Quote from EternalHS >>

Ok, I see that some of you don't get how card game sets are made. No worries, I've got your back :)

Sets in card games are usually made months, if not (in case of MtG) years, in advance. So, by the time that last year's meta was forming, I guess either Un'Goro or KotF, this set was already made. This is why it seems to you like they're not keeping up with the current meta.

Quote from Jarsniffer >>

 When you design a successful multi-billion dollar game then maybe you can talk, until then STFU

 

Quote from f0sh1zzl3 >>

can we stop with the rants already? the expansion isn't even out yet, nor have we seen all the cards ... how the fuck do you guys want to know what the meta will be like or if a card is powerful or not? everybody though cabal lakey would suck, yet is is played in every warlock deck. just be patient and actually see how good the cards/classes/decks will be then you can still go on rants afterwards ...

Quote from TheScot >>

 

Quote from f0sh1zzl3 >>

can we stop with the rants already? the expansion isn't even out yet, nor have we seen all the cards ... how the fuck do you guys want to know what the meta will be like or if a card is powerful or not? everybody though cabal lakey would suck, yet is is played in every warlock deck. just be patient and actually see how good the cards/classes/decks will be then you can still go on rants afterwards ...

 I'd love for you to be right, and that warlock won't become as oppressive as Razakus Priest. But with warlock losing almost nothing from their arsenal (umm, I think just Mistress of Mixtures and N'zoth .. so 3 cards out of 30), and then getting two really strong legendaries ... I feel a big nerf coming on about a month into the expac, after lots more warlock hate. And then sad warlocks whose deck got wrecked. 

Let's hope I'm wrong.

Quote from TheScot >>

 

Quote from f0sh1zzl3 >>

can we stop with the rants already? the expansion isn't even out yet, nor have we seen all the cards ... how the fuck do you guys want to know what the meta will be like or if a card is powerful or not? everybody though cabal lakey would suck, yet is is played in every warlock deck. just be patient and actually see how good the cards/classes/decks will be then you can still go on rants afterwards ...

 I'd love for you to be right, and that warlock won't become as oppressive as Razakus Priest. But with warlock losing almost nothing from their arsenal (umm, I think just Mistress of Mixtures and N'zoth .. so 3 cards out of 30), and then getting two really strong legendaries ... I feel a big nerf coming on about a month into the expac, after lots more warlock hate. And then sad warlocks whose deck got wrecked. 

Let's hope I'm wrong.

Quote from f0sh1zzl3 >>

 

I know there are some really strong/oppressive decks which are kind of frustrating to play against. but there is alway a counter. I've been playing a lot kingsbane/mill rogue lately and I am always happy to face a warlock. elly/jade shaman also does decently against warlock if you hex/devolve the right targets. and I am sure there will be new decks that do well against warlock. improvise, adapt, overcome.

Everyone seems to be forgetting that Team 5 always adds hate cards for the expected problem decks/cards in the expected meta. 

We have not yet seen any of these hate cards. Stay tuned and calm the fuck down.

Quote from Stock_speaketh >>

 

Quote from DoubleSummon >>

  Alright turns out a rebuke effect on a body is pretty good, didn't knew the actual stats, knew loatheb is still good though. rebuke isn't that good though cause it doesn't have a body attached and is more of a tech card, rather than just a solid good card, not like loatheb

 Dude. Ok i ll make it easier. Imagine playing Murloc pally. 5 mana. You either play vanilla 5/5 and get Loatheb effect, or you paying for this effect 2 mana and playing Coldlight Seer or Murloc Warleader which are murlocs and actually have synergy with the rest of the deck . Which one is better, let me think, hmmmmmm

 

Quote from SlydE >>

  Loatheb without a question. You are comparing using 2 cards vs using one which is a massive difference for an agressive deck.