Glinda Crowskin could become a really strong card in wild. just think of the prenerfed Molten Giant. If you're at let's say 9 health, play glinda, then 6 molten giants, heal yourself for 8 with Dark Pact and follow that up with something like a Lesser Amethyst Spellstone, then you're back at around 24 health and you got an almost full board of molten giants.
I'm still searching for more potential combo's at the moment, but this one could be really strong.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
- "No matter what. You keep finding something to fight for"
Mhm, you are right. You can play the Naga with 25 Health and still be able to summon bunch of giants from her, while with the new legendary you have to go really low. The pay-off may be great, but it might be kinda risky in some MUs. So the Naga combo will stay as the preferred one.
You guys say naga is better...dude you can fill board with 2 cards glinda and 1 molten giant...naga? You will probably drop almost every giant from your hand and when they clear the board what you got?? So yes i dont think you will run glinda in giantlock xd it is better in controllock or renolock or even handlock with 1 molten and still you have emparor so if you manage to lower the cost of glinda and reno you have full board and 30hp :)
It takes more conditions (less health, more mana) but way less cards (just 2, against 3+), making way for more tools than Nagalock can have in their hand and decks.
It takes more conditions (less health, more mana) but way less cards (just 2, against 3+), making way for more tools than Nagalock can have in their hand and decks.
THIS!! i think noone understand this sadly...this card just doesn't fit in giantlock....
Or glinda + Naga + 1 free giant = a full board for 3 cards and 10 mana. Probably too unreliatable and late in the game.
Glinda + molten at less than 11 health left probably won't see play either except maybe a reno deck just because too many wild decks have 10+ damage reach. i.e the reason Jarraxus is no longer played.
Or glinda + Naga + 1 free giant = a full board for 3 cards and 10 mana. Probably too unreliatable and late in the game.
Glinda + molten at less than 11 health left probably won't see play either except maybe a reno deck just because too many wild decks have 10+ damage reach. i.e the reason Jarraxus is no longer played.
I could be completely wrong though.
Believe me jarraxus would see play if there is no DK xd
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Glinda Crowskin could become a really strong card in wild. just think of the prenerfed Molten Giant. If you're at let's say 9 health, play glinda, then 6 molten giants, heal yourself for 8 with Dark Pact and follow that up with something like a Lesser Amethyst Spellstone, then you're back at around 24 health and you got an almost full board of molten giants.
I'm still searching for more potential combo's at the moment, but this one could be really strong.
- "No matter what. You keep finding something to fight for"
Whatever the scenario, it's not as bad as naga sea witch.
They are going to 'fix' naga sea witch again at some point.
You guys say naga is better...dude you can fill board with 2 cards glinda and 1 molten giant...naga? You will probably drop almost every giant from your hand and when they clear the board what you got?? So yes i dont think you will run glinda in giantlock xd it is better in controllock or renolock or even handlock with 1 molten and still you have emparor so if you manage to lower the cost of glinda and reno you have full board and 30hp :)
if i make 1 mana creature cheaper (0) with Thaurissan will echo copies also cost 0?
Glinda + molten is a Controlock combo.
It takes more conditions (less health, more mana) but way less cards (just 2, against 3+), making way for more tools than Nagalock can have in their hand and decks.
I enjoy.
Or glinda + Naga + 1 free giant = a full board for 3 cards and 10 mana. Probably too unreliatable and late in the game.
Glinda + molten at less than 11 health left probably won't see play either except maybe a reno deck just because too many wild decks have 10+ damage reach. i.e the reason Jarraxus is no longer played.
I could be completely wrong though.