Low interaction, extreme ability to rebound. Play dudes, turn dudes sideways to attack. Dude paladin, as a deck, asks a question - "do you have a board clear every turn?"
you should see it in wild with minibot, muster and quartermaster. that being said, if you face a warlock and dont have board and tarim on 6 u just lose. dragon priest should be a tough matchup because they always have duskbreaker on 4 and potentially 3 more to wipe you board over and over again
It can go either way. When I play against them I just try and keep their board clear. constantly 1up. Provide bigger threat and like you say.. AOE clear.
ATTACHMENTS
Dudin
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Please don't tell my girlfriend about my card collection...
Everything is toxic to someone. Just counting the amount of "cancer" decks in the format probably means this is the most healthy standard in a long time.
Decks I've seen being called cancer on hearthpwn since the patches nerf:
Yep any type of control/cube locks beats them pretty much every time. Also as someone mentioned warrior with all of their 1 damage aoe clears beats them also. I leveled Dudadin up to 8, 4 stars last month and then saw nothing but those two classes as I fell back down to 10, 0 stars.
Well the issue with this deck is that the person who's playing it plays cards. And if your opponents plays cards then it's a cancer deck. That's what hearthpwn has taught me.
Just counting the amount of "cancer" decks in the format probably means this is the most healthy standard in a long time.
A meta isn't healthy if it has a lot of "cancer" decks in it. A true cancer deck makes a meta unhealthy. Having ten cancer decks in a meta isn't any more healthy than having one. I'm not saying any of the decks we have right now are cancerous, just pointing out that having more cancer doesn't give you a healthier meta.
Just counting the amount of "cancer" decks in the format probably means this is the most healthy standard in a long time.
A meta isn't healthy if it has a lot of "cancer" decks in it. A true cancer deck makes a meta unhealthy. Having ten cancer decks in a meta isn't any more healthy than having one. I'm not saying any of the decks we have right now are cancerous, just pointing out that having more cancer doesn't give you a healthier meta.
But having 10 cancer decks, means the meta is very balance,...... That is what he meant.
It's the ol "If everything's broken, nothing's broken" argument.
Dude Paladin isn't very toxic. I still think murloc paladin is more powerful, personally. I don't face warlocks nearly as much these days (only 20% compared to 35-40% of games lol), so you can actually try to tech more towards paladins. Hell even my murloc paladin is using a Consecration right now haha, to help deal with aggro matchups.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Twitch name: Anatak15 NA Legend Season 48, 49, 52, 53, 54, 74
It still the aggro killer, even better than the locks . Problem Blizzard keep print freaking enrage stuff but without any half decent enrage unit. If they learn their mistake and print more value and card draw stuff for the class , it will take over the ladder next month
Dudeadin is counterable, but this meta has moved to it's final stages before the next expansion (as does EVERY meta-cycle) where the top tier decks make it utterly impossible to do well with any deck that isn't pumping out broken synergies turn after turn.
That's just how the meta moves. We have a month or so to go and then the meta will change again and it all changes. I'm ok with letting paladin have a good time for a while, especially since I do have decks that deal with them pretty well if I really feel like I need to win for some reason.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Look at this thing and let me know what you think!
It still the aggro killer, even better than the locks . Problem Blizzard keep print freaking enrage stuff but without any half decent enrage unit. If they learn their mistake and print more value and card draw stuff for the class , it will take over the ladder next month
Even better than the locks ? Hahaha let me laugh please
Defile is 100x better than all the warrior board clears, and no need to mention kabal lackey+dark pact that bring voidloard on the board. Sorry but warrior doesn't kill anything anymore. It's sad because i like this class and it's the only one i have in golden
Low interaction, extreme ability to rebound. Play dudes, turn dudes sideways to attack. Dude paladin, as a deck, asks a question - "do you have a board clear every turn?"
Thoughts from others in the community?
Control warlock wrecks him
you should see it in wild with minibot, muster and quartermaster. that being said, if you face a warlock and dont have board and tarim on 6 u just lose. dragon priest should be a tough matchup because they always have duskbreaker on 4 and potentially 3 more to wipe you board over and over again
Play control warlock and you have it (the clear every turn)...
The only thing that makes it truly annoying is one card: sunkeeper tarim, one of the most powerful legendaries in the game.
It can go either way. When I play against them I just try and keep their board clear. constantly 1up. Provide bigger threat and like you say.. AOE clear.
Please don't tell my girlfriend about my card collection...
Everything is toxic to someone. Just counting the amount of "cancer" decks in the format probably means this is the most healthy standard in a long time.
Decks I've seen being called cancer on hearthpwn since the patches nerf:
Cubelock
Controllock
Murloc Pala
Dudedin
Secret Mage
Spiteful Priest
Exodia Mage
Kingsbane Mill Rogue
sounds like a healthy format. And tbh calling aggro decks mindless is usually a mistake inexperienced players often make
Control Warrior does pretty well against them.
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
Yep any type of control/cube locks beats them pretty much every time. Also as someone mentioned warrior with all of their 1 damage aoe clears beats them also. I leveled Dudadin up to 8, 4 stars last month and then saw nothing but those two classes as I fell back down to 10, 0 stars.
Well the issue with this deck is that the person who's playing it plays cards. And if your opponents plays cards then it's a cancer deck. That's what hearthpwn has taught me.
It's the ol "If everything's broken, nothing's broken" argument.
Dude Paladin isn't very toxic. I still think murloc paladin is more powerful, personally. I don't face warlocks nearly as much these days (only 20% compared to 35-40% of games lol), so you can actually try to tech more towards paladins. Hell even my murloc paladin is using a Consecration right now haha, to help deal with aggro matchups.
Twitch name: Anatak15
NA Legend Season 48, 49, 52, 53, 54, 74
Cancerous? No
Annoying and monotonous? Yes
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
Dudeadin is counterable, but this meta has moved to it's final stages before the next expansion (as does EVERY meta-cycle) where the top tier decks make it utterly impossible to do well with any deck that isn't pumping out broken synergies turn after turn.
That's just how the meta moves. We have a month or so to go and then the meta will change again and it all changes. I'm ok with letting paladin have a good time for a while, especially since I do have decks that deal with them pretty well if I really feel like I need to win for some reason.
Look at this thing and let me know what you think!
Toxic .. no.
Annoying ... kinda.
Borderline Ridiculous on shear number of minions ... YES!
I though Shaman could fill a board out of nowhere, but they aren't squat compared to dude paladin.
I wanna glide down, over Mulholland
I wanna write her, name in the sky
I wanna free fall, out into nothin'
Gonna leave this, world for awhile