Hi for the third time in 4 day. When i destroy kingsbane. My opponent draw it from the top of his deck....
By all means please when you destroy kingsbane with an ooze or whatever it should not be place on top of the deck, this is simply unacceptable. Please fix this.
Ps: 2 time out of 3 it was on turn 4 so the rogue did have a lot of card remaining in is deck.
There's nothing to fix, you just got unlucky. 3 times in 4 days is not nearly a large enough sample size to make any significant inference anyway. But feel free to visit the salt thread to vent, that might help :)
Im not salty. Im just making a statement. This should not happen especially while being in the beggining of a game. I can understand when near the end of a game while 6 or 7 card remains in the deck but at the beginning of a game this is simply insulting. Because this deck already has way to get it back.
The fact that this is a possibility is simply wrong. I know shuffle mean it can be anywhere..but seriously i have played cards game for almost 20 years and never this kind of shuffle happen except if you cheat it. So because this is a coded game it happen is simply wrong.
Im not salty at all im just expressing my concern about something that i find unpleasent in the game. I never call it broken or whatever. I just think its weird that it happen so often now.
Keep in mind that i, like many others run an ooze in the deck to counter decks with weapons. How would any react if after playing the counter the opponent draw it again? What about the weapon in question being a legendary card that only as 1 copy in the whole deck. This is like countering the counter without having to do nothing. That is why i started the topic.
It aint a question of being salty or being unlucky or etc. Its a question of logic.
Im not salty. Im just making a statement. This should not happen especially while being in the beggining of a game. I can understand when near the end of a game while 6 or 7 card remains in the deck but at the beginning of a game this is simply insulting. Because this deck already has way to get it back.
The fact that this is a possibility is simply wrong. I know shuffle mean it can be anywhere..but seriously i have played cards game for almost 20 years and never this kind of shuffle happen except if you cheat it. So because this is a coded game it happen is simply wrong.
Im not salty at all im just expressing my concern about something that i find unpleasent in the game. I never call it broken or whatever. I just think its weird that it happen so often now.
Im here to discuss not cry.
You're not here to discuss if you dismiss everyone who disagrees with you, you're here to find someone you can say "I'm right about this, pat my back while I fume over being screwed in a card game" to. If you wanted to discuss it you would propose a change that solved your "issue" AND is a fair compromise to those who use the card.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Look at this thing and let me know what you think!
Im not salty. Im just making a statement. This should not happen especially while being in the beggining of a game. I can understand when near the end of a game while 6 or 7 card remains in the deck but at the beginning of a game this is simply insulting. Because this deck already has way to get it back.
The fact that this is a possibility is simply wrong. I know shuffle mean it can be anywhere..but seriously i have played cards game for almost 20 years and never this kind of shuffle happen except if you cheat it. So because this is a coded game it happen is simply wrong.
Im not salty at all im just expressing my concern about something that i find unpleasent in the game. I never call it broken or whatever. I just think its weird that it happen so often now.
Im here to discuss not cry.
It’s just sooooo stupid. Like incredibly stupid.
It is shuffled into the deck which means it could be put on top or anywhere else. Don’t complain about your own ignorance.
Right now the only comment are : bad luck, the deck was empty, its the way it work, your salty.
A simple fix would be to not having being a possibility of being place on top of the deck until a certain amount of card remain in the deck.
By the way im open to any way to fix it and i never shut down any argument speaking a way to deal with it. Please read the comments before making that kind of statement.
A simple fix would be to not having being a possibility of being place on top of the deck until a certain amount of card remain in the deck.
By the way im open to any way to fix it and i never shut down any argument speaking a way to deal with it. Please read the comments before making that kind of statement.
That’s not a simple fix, that’s a complete redesign of the way randomness in the game works. Nothing is broken, you just came out on the wrong end of chance this time.
So your "proposal" is that just kingsbane be impossible to top deck?
What about OP 1-drops? Can we make those impossible to get on turn 1?
Can we make Reno Jackson impossible to draw on turn 6?
Should it be impossible to topdeck lethal?
There's no basis for your proposal, it's a strict nerf that just says "if you play this card, your luck must be worse than every other deck". This is a salt-solution. It doesn't make the game better, it doesn't balance out an unbalanced card/mechanic, and it doesn't even make sense logically. There's SO MANY decks right now that can highroll into an instant win scenario right now, why pick one win condition for one deck and single it out? Don't talk completely out of your ass and then get defensive about it like you're the victim.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Look at this thing and let me know what you think!
So your "proposal" is that just kingsbane be impossible to top deck?
What about OP 1-drops? Can we make those impossible to get on turn 1?
Can we make Reno Jackson impossible to draw on turn 6?
Should it be impossible to topdeck lethal?
There's no basis for your proposal, it's a strict nerf that just says "if you play this card, your luck must be worse than every other deck". This is a salt-solution. It doesn't make the game better, it doesn't balance out an unbalanced card/mechanic, and it doesn't even make sense logically. There's SO MANY decks right now that can highroll into an instant win scenario right now, why pick one win condition for one deck and single it out? Don't talk completely out of your ass and then get defensive about it like you're the victim.
Ok
1 my oponnent play kingsbane (turn 3)
2 i destroy it with an ooze (turn 3)
3 when he start his turn he draw it back (turn 4)
This has nothing to do with redesign or whatever. This as nothing to do with other cards or with being a victim. And no its not unlogic. If you cant handle a simple discussion dont post my friend. Your comment add nothing to the conversation.
I know i was unlucky during those match. But i found it weird that it happen in the first place. If you cant counter a card because the next turn he will draw it again its unfair its unfair because its a legendary wich means its as 1 copy only in the deck. It doesnt mean the card us unbalance its just these kind of odds should not happen.
If you have something to say other than blasting me. You know like something constructive. I invite you to move on.
Okay, so first of all, people are trying to give reasons for why this would be a bad idea. You just keep saying that they’re attacking you. That’s not trying to hold a discussion. That’s playing the victim.
Also, to the guy saying people shouldn’t respond to posts they have issues with, it wouldn’t be a discussion if that were the case. That’s called an echo chamber. People responding with why it bothers them is what makes it a discussion.
Instead of giving your opinion about the subject you instead write names to blast. Mostly because its a deck you own and you dont want it to be change.
I though this is a forum... i was wrong there is nothing here except kids that adds nothing to the discussion and probly even dont bother read the damn comments before posting.
Instead of calling me ignorant why dont you teach me your knowledge.
Why cant nobody be civilised in a forum why is it needed to be such an agressive behavior all time for no reason at all.
This was my first topic and my last because clearly im too old for this kind of ignorant poorly though bullshit that i get from it.
Goodbye and thanks for showing me the true color of this crapy forum website.
So your "proposal" is that just kingsbane be impossible to top deck?
What about OP 1-drops? Can we make those impossible to get on turn 1?
Can we make Reno Jackson impossible to draw on turn 6?
Should it be impossible to topdeck lethal?
There's no basis for your proposal, it's a strict nerf that just says "if you play this card, your luck must be worse than every other deck". This is a salt-solution. It doesn't make the game better, it doesn't balance out an unbalanced card/mechanic, and it doesn't even make sense logically. There's SO MANY decks right now that can highroll into an instant win scenario right now, why pick one win condition for one deck and single it out? Don't talk completely out of your ass and then get defensive about it like you're the victim.
...
This has nothing to do with redesign or whatever. This as nothing to do with other cards or with being a victim. And no its not unlogic.
Yes it does, my examples highlight how lucky draws swing the game constantly in hearthstone, and that nerfing one card for something that happens in every deck, every day, to everyone is nonsensical.
If you cant handle a simple discussion dont post my friend. Your comment add nothing to the conversation. Soapboxing isn't a conversation. You aren't discussing anything either. Anyone who tells you you're just unlucky you dismiss and continue to argue that being unlucky means a card should be nerfed.
I know i was unlucky during those match.Finally! But i found it weird that it happen in the first place.SO? If you cant counter a card because the next turn he will draw it again its unfair its unfair because its a legendary wich means its as 1 copy only in the deck. It doesnt mean the card us unbalance its just these kind of odds should not happen. You can mill it, tech in more weapon removal, or just make a stronger deck... I mean whether he drew it twice or not he can still doomerang it, use cavern shinyfinder, or just draw a lot to get it again anyway. That's how decks work. If you can deal with it attack once per turn you need better decks.
If you have something to say other than blasting me. You know like something constructive. I invite you to move on. Sure, I never expected you to agree, but explaining why your argument is lame is key to making sure people who read this don't post even more threads about it later.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Look at this thing and let me know what you think!
Hi for the third time in 4 day. When i destroy kingsbane. My opponent draw it from the top of his deck....
By all means please when you destroy kingsbane with an ooze or whatever it should not be place on top of the deck, this is simply unacceptable. Please fix this.
Ps: 2 time out of 3 it was on turn 4 so the rogue did have a lot of card remaining in is deck.
Thanks for reading.
There's nothing to fix, you just got unlucky. 3 times in 4 days is not nearly a large enough sample size to make any significant inference anyway. But feel free to visit the salt thread to vent, that might help :)
it's called re-shuffle. It can get ANYWHERE in the deck. It was just bad luck
Plus Rogues have ways of drawing kingsbane back out of the deck. It's not broke just the way it works.
plottwist: opponent only had 1 card left :D
Can we please start banning the users who creates these topics?
Im not salty. Im just making a statement. This should not happen especially while being in the beggining of a game. I can understand when near the end of a game while 6 or 7 card remains in the deck but at the beginning of a game this is simply insulting. Because this deck already has way to get it back.
The fact that this is a possibility is simply wrong. I know shuffle mean it can be anywhere..but seriously i have played cards game for almost 20 years and never this kind of shuffle happen except if you cheat it. So because this is a coded game it happen is simply wrong.
Im not salty at all im just expressing my concern about something that i find unpleasent in the game. I never call it broken or whatever. I just think its weird that it happen so often now.
Im here to discuss not cry.
Keep in mind that i, like many others run an ooze in the deck to counter decks with weapons. How would any react if after playing the counter the opponent draw it again? What about the weapon in question being a legendary card that only as 1 copy in the whole deck. This is like countering the counter without having to do nothing. That is why i started the topic.
It aint a question of being salty or being unlucky or etc. Its a question of logic.
Thanks for reading.
Look at this thing and let me know what you think!
When did i refute anybody argument?
Right now the only comment are : bad luck, the deck was empty, its the way it work, your salty.
A simple fix would be to not having being a possibility of being place on top of the deck until a certain amount of card remain in the deck.
By the way im open to any way to fix it and i never shut down any argument speaking a way to deal with it. Please read the comments before making that kind of statement.
Why so agressive?
Why do you need to call me stupid and ignorant.
In the comment you quote i already say that shuffle mean anywhere...
Please read the comments before posting.
I wish it would happen to me only 3 times in 4 days... Haha.
Seriously though, if people have issues with these threads they just shouldn't bother responding to them. It does belong in the salt thread though.
Twitch name: Anatak15
NA Legend Season 48, 49, 52, 53, 54, 74
So your "proposal" is that just kingsbane be impossible to top deck?
What about OP 1-drops? Can we make those impossible to get on turn 1?
Can we make Reno Jackson impossible to draw on turn 6?
Should it be impossible to topdeck lethal?
There's no basis for your proposal, it's a strict nerf that just says "if you play this card, your luck must be worse than every other deck". This is a salt-solution. It doesn't make the game better, it doesn't balance out an unbalanced card/mechanic, and it doesn't even make sense logically. There's SO MANY decks right now that can highroll into an instant win scenario right now, why pick one win condition for one deck and single it out? Don't talk completely out of your ass and then get defensive about it like you're the victim.
Look at this thing and let me know what you think!
You should stop playing this game...or at least stop sharing your "wisdom" about how it works since it is utter bullshit.
Okay, so first of all, people are trying to give reasons for why this would be a bad idea. You just keep saying that they’re attacking you. That’s not trying to hold a discussion. That’s playing the victim.
Also, to the guy saying people shouldn’t respond to posts they have issues with, it wouldn’t be a discussion if that were the case. That’s called an echo chamber. People responding with why it bothers them is what makes it a discussion.
By all means you guys are cry babies.
Instead of giving your opinion about the subject you instead write names to blast. Mostly because its a deck you own and you dont want it to be change.
I though this is a forum... i was wrong there is nothing here except kids that adds nothing to the discussion and probly even dont bother read the damn comments before posting.
Instead of calling me ignorant why dont you teach me your knowledge.
Why cant nobody be civilised in a forum why is it needed to be such an agressive behavior all time for no reason at all.
This was my first topic and my last because clearly im too old for this kind of ignorant poorly though bullshit that i get from it.
Goodbye and thanks for showing me the true color of this crapy forum website.
Look at this thing and let me know what you think!