Hearthpwn

Quote from Kaladin >>

i should have played around it.

 That's why I don't play slow hunter decks if it doesn't have board clears, you just get board pressured to death after transitioning into the DK, and feel hopeless since there's nothing you can do about it but hope to pull a dreadscale or bloatbat with poison.

i should have played around it. 

now have a 17% winrate with cube hunter.

tell me how this is a good deck.

should have played around topdeck 2nd savage roar.

edit: to be clear, i won this one, but it's just really frustrating when everyone constantly draws so well against me.

my fault for not playing around rokdelar giving double crushing walls double wahtever the fuck that 1 mana 2 damage spell is

my fault for not playing around triple animal companion rolling triple leokk

i shouldn't have played a turn 4 8/8, this loss is on me.

my fault for trying to set up a multiple turn board clear with geddon,

instead of playing around topdeck sound the bells.

Quote from Kaladin >>

my fault for trying to set up a multiple turn board clear with geddon,

instead of playing around topdeck sound the bells.

 Mate do you ever win any games.?

Quote from Kaladin >>

"cube hunter is really good guys"

 Why would you hero power on 3 mana and not play Terrorscale Stalker? You can play cards for tempo and board control you know...

I get this is the salt thread but it's obvious from so many of your posts that you misplay constantly. Stop whining and learn to play better bud.

Quote from latinvampire >>

Quote from Fog_za >>

Quote from Arivaali >>

Quote from Oneru >>

Can't wait until those bloody Death Knights rotate out, man I'm sick of the way Gul'dan and Jaina suck all the fun out of long games.

 I'd add Deathstalker Rexxard to this list.  "Rexxard" is not a typo.

 I defended Rexxar recently, but I definitely think it's undercosted now. Coining out a win condition on turn 5 is a bit much. Hunter is gonna suck after rotation.

 Oddly enough, I did this a few pages back myself.  I do wonder if the original cost of the card factored in the beast buckets were originally only those "printed" linearly to KofFT.  Adding in latter beasts from post expansions....should this make the card more expensive?

Dunno.

I do know the frustration of having being on the receiving end of it's Clutch card potential though.

 I think if Hagatha costs 8, Rexxar can at least cost 7.

You can be edgy like I was, and play ww pipers instead. Its guaranteed keleseth, but while we all hate the card, tracking is just better

I have lost for the 6th time in a row. 

Send Halp.

Quote from Calimahr >>

What is with all the hate against netdecks? If you want to climb in ranked, you gotta have the best decks, and there are statistically a few decks that are better than others. It's always been like this.

 

21-25 rank players surely want to climb in ranked.

im sorry guys

i hope you all get to be moderators so you can decide what im allowed to post

seems thats what you want.

misplay sometimes? sure.  but its within the rules of this thread and forum to post frustrating things.

6 games queued so far this morning

5 worst possible matchups for my deck.

seems about right.

Quote from Calimahr >>

Quote from Arivaali >>

Quote from Calimahr >>

What is with all the hate against netdecks? If you want to climb in ranked, you gotta have the best decks, and there are statistically a few decks that are better than others. It's always been like this.

 

21-25 rank players surely want to climb in ranked.

 Uh, yes? Yes they do?

Now I understand that it is somewhat unfair to be new to the game and have to face down decks with 5 legendaries in it that systematically crush you, but that is a structural issue created by how blizzard matches its opponents, not by the fact that people choose to play decks that have statistically been proven to have a high winrate,

 No, I'm not new, I want to play decks I want and play against players like me, but there is no place for fun it seems. There are many crap sick players who like to humiliate others. That's the only reason why they can not climb in ladder with these decks. I would not say that if they did not spam emotes in the process.

Quote from Calimahr >>

 Well, having bad manners and netdecking is not the same thing. One can use a netdeck and be polite at the same time (like me, for instance). And you can still play and have fun by using custom-created decks. If you think it is fun, then go ahead ^^ But don't expect to win with them compared to decks that are created for winning.

I'm wanting to say that there are many people who are doing both(netdeck + spam emotes). 
Anyway, if I meet player with netdeck and he is not spamming emotes I still hate him, as he ruins fun.

People still playing Big decks in Wild are literally the most boring people ever

Quote from Calimahr >>

Quote from Arivaali >>

Quote from Calimahr >>

 Well, having bad manners and netdecking is not the same thing. One can use a netdeck and be polite at the same time (like me, for instance). And you can still play and have fun by using custom-created decks. If you think it is fun, then go ahead ^^ But don't expect to win with them compared to decks that are created for winning.

I'm wanting to say that there are many people who are doing both(netdeck + spam emotes). 
Anyway, if I meet player with netdeck and he is not spamming emotes I still hate him, as he ruins fun.

Fair enough. I can get hating on Netdecks in casual.

 Yeah, that's horrible. Even worse thing is that if I lose 10 or more games in a row to netdeckers in casual, I start to play against new players. I can not understand that polarity, where is the middle? Or there are only netdeckers and new players? I can not play against both of them.

Wild Cubelock 3 times in a row into Standard Heal Zoolock (in Wild) 4 times in a row. Wasn't aware that it's National Warlock Degeneracy Day.