Hearthpwn

There's no longer a reason to deck build in HS because Tier 1 decks will easily beat your counter deck, Razakus and Keleseth rogue have no counter whill Secret Paladin was countered by BGH and other tier 2 decks

Fix your game blizz because if i cant deck buiild there is no reason to throw $50 on packs

The current meta may not be as bad as it was before the Druid nerfs, but this is still bad. Even though I do have a level of respect for Ben Brode and Mike Donais, I personally am and have been losing faith in T5 to keep the game in check. There will always be decks better than others, because it' s impossible to perfectly balance a game like Hearthstone, but when certain decks are too powerful, it shouldn't be that difficult to nerf cards enough to make those powerhouse decks on par with the rest of the meta at the very least.

I respectfully disagree. Although some things can be construed as bad game design (looking at Raza & Anduin combo) you can still win quite easily with your own deck. Hell I climb with miracle rogue!

Quote from Ragnarok231 >>

There's no longer a reason to deck build in HS because Tier 1 decks will easily beat your counter deck, Razakus and Keleseth rogue have no counter whill Secret Paladin was countered by BGH and other tier 2 decks

 

Fix your game blizz because if i cant deck buiild there is no reason to throw $50 on packs

I think the meta is ok to good, not great and not bad, almost every class have a decent deck, there is no oppresive class and the paper-rock-scissors system works fine, people complain because they are used to netdecking a "overpower" deck or the counter to that deck, in this meta you can do that, and you have to think a bit more,adjust and netdeckers hate that

Razakus Priest and Tempo Rogue don't have counters? Have you tried an aggro deck? Exodia Mage > Razakus Priest. Any deck that can flood the board > Tempo Rogue. Razakus Priest is also Tier 3. So, LOL to your title.