Hearthpwn

I know this is stupid, but Hunter.  I hate playing against hunter.  I don't like playing as hunter.  I just don't like hunter

It's actually hard to pick between Shadow Rape Anduin or Evolve-Jade-Evolve-BL Shaman at the moment. Considering how consistently unfun shaman has been for me to play with and against, I have to pick Shaman overall.

Quote from Vanille159 >>

Mage, just because of the Ice Block... And because i NEVER get my Eater of Secrets at the right time :/

Priest for sure...Highlander priest is like the old miracle except it doesn't have weakness against aggro...Big Priest is also extremely frustrating to play against...Turn 4 Barne into 1/1 that summons a 12/12 dragon is not fun.

Quote from Wrathian >>

Priest for sure...Highlander priest is like the old miracle except it doesn't have weakness against aggro...Big Priest is also extremely frustrating to play against...Turn 4 Barne into 1/1 that summons a 12/12 dragon is not fun.

Priest. I hate that class so much i have dusted all my priest cards

Priest. Even before Priest was good it was a awful experience to play against. Just Quest Mage is more awful but you run at least not every second game into them...

I picked Hunter, but it would be a close race between them, and Paladin. 

As much as I rail on Priests, fast aggro like Hunter and Murlocadin are what usually break my win streaks ....because I usually ladder with .... fast aggro. Occasionally I get wrecked by a Priest or Shaman, but it is because they drew their cards well, and I drew mine poorly. More often than not, They are dead or dying before they get a chance to assemble their puzzle. 

But other aggro decks ... thats the big issue for me. It usually takes 1 bad turn, and the game is over. And if we both draw right, then it comes down to who went first. Those are the matches I hate, because they always seem to be what slams the door on a good win streak. 

None tbh, the game is pretty well balanced. All classes are perfectly viable, you just need to know how to play the matchups and optimally, at a push I'd probably ban mage since they have four very viable archetypes and it's often challenging to mulligan against plus they can easily hide the quest, although quest mage probably being the easiest to face.

Priests have always been the biggest doucheclowns in the game. Because they're such a reactive class, even when they were bad, they still pissed me off due to their thievery and ability to see what's in my hand and deck.

I would just ban everything.  Make ladder actually unplayable until they pay attention to card balance.  

Priest for sure! I can't stand playing against this hero. It's like pulling teeth every time you play vs. a priest!

I already banned warrior. If you know what I mean

I'd say Warrior before the latest nerf. Now, it's mage for me. What a dull and uninteractive class...

Druid. Currently they have the best aggro and control deck in game, which are very difficult matchups for most decks.

If there's an archetype I hate, I just play a deck that beats it.

The desire to ban a class is a sign of weakness.