I've been mulling over it a bit and I really want to try and make a the deck work, but is it too greedy or slow to run Lord Jaraxxus and Bloodreaver Gul'dan in the same deck? I feel like there is good synergy there, especially if you can run Jaraxxus first. Plus, I've had so many games where I need Guldan, like now, and he's in the last 5 cards of the deck. Could running Jaraxxus as well be kind of an extra stall until guldan, or even another win condition when Guldan isn't anywhere to be found? Would like some opinions.
I have seen it used against me, but it is kinda just a meme. With the meta as it is, 15 hp at that point in the game is usually facing lethal. And you definitely do not want to Jaraxxus after you pop Gul'dan .... the loss of the lifesteal hero power would be bad. With the perfect setup, you can pop Jaraxxus, summon a few demons, and them pop Gul'Dan, and resummon them ... but like I said ... perfect conditions.
The nice thing is, most warlock decks have some room to experiment, so it's not gonna kill the deck if you try it ... and who knows, you may get lucky
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I wanna glide down, over Mulholland I wanna write her, name in the sky I wanna free fall, out into nothin' Gonna leave this, world for awhile
If you're in a situation where you have to play your Bloodweaver before Jaraxxus or not needing Jaraxxus anytime soon; you can at least use Jaraxxus as a minion through Kruul and resummon with Bloodweaver