People have been net-decking at rank 20 at least since I started almost 2 years ago and I imagine it's been that way for a while. Look on the bright side. There's no meta snapshot for KFT yet.
why would someone do his own deck while he can netdeck the same idea but with a better build, what is boring is people constantly opening retarded threads like yours about either netdeck, war face, supposedly lowered legendary drop rates or whatever other shit you can come with
most players just don't care trying shit decks in ranked moreover when most of them are ridiculously expensive or play with shit cards useless everywhere but in this sole deck
Honestly, the only thing pissing me off is that I have to test dumb casual decks in ranked at this point in time already because Casual is still flooded with Pirate cancer and doesn't allow any casual decks to be played unless you load over a third of your deck with anti-aggro cards.
So yeah...And btw.. how do you know they are using net-decks if you dont use netdecks yourself?
If you are facing of the exact same deck 9 times in a row i think you might be able to figure one thing or another without any major degree in statistics.
not to mention you can look up net decks without actually net decking.
Honestly, the only thing pissing me off is that I have to test dumb casual decks in ranked at this point in time already because Casual is still flooded with Pirate cancer and doesn't allow any casual decks to be played unless you load over a third of your deck with anti-aggro cards.
If your deck is constantly beaten by a popular, cheap, effective deck then your deck isn't good enough. That's pretty much the definition. If you're testing a deck for ladder, you need to face the decks you're going to face, otherwise it's a pretty pointless test.
Honestly, the only thing pissing me off is that I have to test dumb casual decks in ranked at this point in time already because Casual is still flooded with Pirate cancer and doesn't allow any casual decks to be played unless you load over a third of your deck with anti-aggro cards.
If your deck is constantly beaten by a popular, cheap, effective deck then your deck isn't good enough. That's pretty much the definition. If you're testing a deck for ladder, you need to face the decks you're going to face, otherwise it's a pretty pointless test.
I wasn't testing a deck for ladder, I was trying to fuck around with Thief Priest because I pulled Archbishop in one of my packs and figured "might as well make something dumb". The shitshow happening in Casual these days has now fully convinced me to just go play ranked to play fun decks, since everyone seems to follow the direction of just farming for Quests in Casual. I've met more Pirate Warriors there in the 30 minutes of playing it than I have in a good 20 hours of Wild and Standard ranked.
EDIT: 30 minutes/20 hours since KFT release.
I'm not even pissed that they're bringing "meta decks" in casual. I'm pissed that they're bringing the "game's over by turn 4" bullshit into the format supposed to be for casual decks, none of which can stand any freaking chance unless they happen to be running a slew of cheap taunts or super cheap removal.
have you played hs for a long time? this happens every time. some people are not imaginative, some people don't have gold or money and want to invest in just one or two good decks. it is what it is, i wish it wasn't but it's quite normal.
this is how online card games work, if you really want to nt face netdecks yous hould just join a local hobbyshop, most players don't have the money for getting the top tier meta build sin physical so you end-up facing a lot of cool stuff, some hobby shops actually willingly ban meta decks from some of their tournaments, to allow players with lower budgets a chance to win.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
2 out of 3 game i played people copied their decks from hearthpwn
Welcome to hearthstone
I play 2 other digital card games and it's the same thing there. Idk what you are expecting?
most players are unimaginative sheep
news at 11.
People often play to win in ranked. Still am happy to see a goofy card on occasion. Looking at you Archbishop Benedictus.
Not sure if hyped yet.
People have been net-decking at rank 20 at least since I started almost 2 years ago and I imagine it's been that way for a while. Look on the bright side. There's no meta snapshot for KFT yet.
It's rank 20, is it really a big deal if they're netdecking?
Well this is kinda good thing because mostly people who net deck on lower rank don't know how to play said deck anyway
"Ermmm makes sense to netdeck bro, pro players spend a lot of time, we don't have minds to think"
why would someone do his own deck while he can netdeck the same idea but with a better build, what is boring is people constantly opening retarded threads like yours about either netdeck, war face, supposedly lowered legendary drop rates or whatever other shit you can come with
caca
caca
Honestly, the only thing pissing me off is that I have to test dumb casual decks in ranked at this point in time already because Casual is still flooded with Pirate cancer and doesn't allow any casual decks to be played unless you load over a third of your deck with anti-aggro cards.
Only 3rd day and already people are whining xD
have you played hs for a long time? this happens every time. some people are not imaginative, some people don't have gold or money and want to invest in just one or two good decks. it is what it is, i wish it wasn't but it's quite normal.
this is how online card games work, if you really want to nt face netdecks yous hould just join a local hobbyshop, most players don't have the money for getting the top tier meta build sin physical so you end-up facing a lot of cool stuff, some hobby shops actually willingly ban meta decks from some of their tournaments, to allow players with lower budgets a chance to win.