Hmm, both vote-options seem pretty stupid. Makes me feel like an US-citizen during the last presidental election. *boing*
But yea, I don't really mind opening any legendary. It's just that I prefer some over the others, but I wouldn't say I'm "scared" to open the princes.^^
How is that stupid? If you're not spending any money on the game you only get maybe 50-60 packs to open per expansion total and that's it. So if you are a competitive player that wants to be able to build strong decks and win it feels really bad if the legendaries you open in your extremely limited amount of packs are bad or unplayable versus strong and good cards. I can really appreciate people who like playing the game for fun or experimenting with bad cards but not everyone enjoys that style of hearthstone.
The 4 mana one isnt THAT bad,its playable atleast.
It's awful. Even if it had the effects without the condition it would still be awful.
Right. Because preventing at least four damage and healing at least four against pirate warrior is absolutely terrible. The card is a decent and situational card that is helpful as an anti-aggro tool in classes that struggle with healing (warlock, rogue, and hunter). Ofc the restriction on it can make it unplayable in those classes but if it didn't have the restriction is would see plenty of play.
Ok, do prologue first and get the random DK, this will enhance RNG opening packs (or not). By the way, I'm a free player, need to work hard in order to be able to follow up the meta
You do the prologue AFTER you open your packs. The prologue guarantees a Death Knight. Doing it first reduces your available legendary pool by 1 (always by a death knight) so your chances of opening a prince is increased. Packs first, prologue second
How is that stupid? If you're not spending any money on the game you only get maybe 50-60 packs to open per expansion total and that's it. So if you are a competitive player that wants to be able to build strong decks and win it feels really bad if the legendaries you open in your extremely limited amount of packs are bad or unplayable versus strong and good cards. I can really appreciate people who like playing the game for fun or experimenting with bad cards but not everyone enjoys that style of hearthstone.
It's stupid, because I'm certain that there are lots of people that are neither scared of opening them, nor are they Kripp and are getting all cards on day one ... I wasn't expecting that I would have to explain that; thought my comparison to the election made that pretty clear.^^
At one point, you just resign yourself. I have reached that point. If I get nothing but princes this expansion, it wouldn't matter because I have the backup plans of grinding arena to dust and back.
I actually won't be too disappointed unless I open Keleseth. Taldaram and Valanar have applications I want to experiement with. Taldaram might be interesting with Rogue deathknight. Valanar might be a solid 4 drop in rogue to gain a bit of health and tank damage. Keleseth only seems good in a zoo style deck and requires being in your hand very early to be any good. Not a deck I am interested in high rolling with.
Well technically the 2 cost one could be ran over the hand buff 2 mana card for pally if you do a 4 spell 26 monster deck. Best case scenario you turn 1 use your 1 mana hand buff card, turn 2 use the 2 mana prince and then the other some 22 cards get essentially the meanstreet buff if they would be in your hand. Most of the time they all only get one or two buffs anyways so if they are all guaranteed 1 to start your deck becomes a lot stronger right off the bat.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
His point is there's no option for people who legitimately don't care
hopefully everyone is scared to open these. They are more of the unplayable lore characters like illidan
My biggest fear is Prince Valanar, I'm pretty OK with the others.
At least people won't be triple unlocking a Prince...If you get a Prince your odds keep getting greater you get the good ones.
Keleseth is on my wishlist. The others will be greeted with some swearing.
12 wins in ArenA with: Mage and Paladin, first time legend with Rogue
Wow 25% of people on this site are kripp he must have a lot of accounts
I've already prepared myself to open prince 3 and prince 4 and then get the Druid DK for free (not a bad card imo, just the least cool).
So I am ready. If this is the case, the first thing im crafting is a golden lich king to make myself feel better.
At one point, you just resign yourself. I have reached that point. If I get nothing but princes this expansion, it wouldn't matter because I have the backup plans of grinding arena to dust and back.
So Option Three is it.
When the weak court death, they find it.
Prince Taldaram has some potential. So I'll probably open the other two from my first packs...
Wow Kripp voted 41 times already
I actually won't be too disappointed unless I open Keleseth. Taldaram and Valanar have applications I want to experiement with. Taldaram might be interesting with Rogue deathknight. Valanar might be a solid 4 drop in rogue to gain a bit of health and tank damage. Keleseth only seems good in a zoo style deck and requires being in your hand very early to be any good. Not a deck I am interested in high rolling with.
I thought for sure Hearthstone would make some kind of exodia effect if you played all 3 in a deck.
I can't believe they couldn't find a cool synergy for running all 3 princes.
They could have at least scrapped them for something iconic like Lord Marrowgar. How is he missing from this expansion??
Lady Deathwhisper too.
Well technically the 2 cost one could be ran over the hand buff 2 mana card for pally if you do a 4 spell 26 monster deck. Best case scenario you turn 1 use your 1 mana hand buff card, turn 2 use the 2 mana prince and then the other some 22 cards get essentially the meanstreet buff if they would be in your hand. Most of the time they all only get one or two buffs anyways so if they are all guaranteed 1 to start your deck becomes a lot stronger right off the bat.