I don't think that's going to be the warrior DK... if that's the warrior DK - EVERY. SINGLE. DECK. will run multiple oozes making the warrior DK redundant unless it gives the weapons immunity from removal effects like ooze.
so far all the ooze said "weapon" so maybe it will only destroy the first one
I don't think that's going to be the warrior DK... if that's the warrior DK - EVERY. SINGLE. DECK. will run multiple oozes making the warrior DK redundant unless it gives the weapons immunity from removal effects like ooze.
With the Jade Killer and all the heavy DK stuff, there's an awful lot of cards that 'every' deck has to run so far. Hope people can find room for it all.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Free to try and find a game, dealing cards for sorrow, cards for pain.
I don't think that's going to be the warrior DK... if that's the warrior DK - EVERY. SINGLE. DECK. will run multiple oozes making the warrior DK redundant unless it gives the weapons immunity from removal effects like ooze.
so far all the ooze said "weapon" so maybe it will only destroy the first one
Which is why people would run multiples. It would be worth the deck slots because the lead warriors would gain using 2 weapons would crush almost every deck without removal.
And be worthless against just about every other class.
Nobody actually playing competitively is going to meta four cards in just for the off chance of facing warriors with the death knight in it. Thinking otherwise is absurd.
With Uther of the Ebon Blade, Rogue finally getting a decent weapon, Pirate/taunt warrior and potential DK warrior, I'm looking forward to getting some use out of my Gluttonous Ooze.
I don't think they will ever do dual wielding, because of many reasons:
- where would the secound Weapon be?
- How would your Weapons lose durability? both at the same time? last equiped first? same goes for dealing damage
- how does dual wielding interact with effects that destroy Weapons?
there are too many factors that would just be too complicated to solve, for dual wielding to be a thing.
- The place where normally hero power is. If it is passive, the place is no longer required
-Dealing damage will be like zombeast i guess. And they both lose 1 durability for 1 attack. If it won't like that, there is no point to dual wielding. Just a passive hero power as "Your weapons have windfurry" is the same effect.
-it is complicated one but i guess it can be chosen randomly or in order like which weapon is equipped first/last.
But it isn't imposible to put dual wielding in HS in my opinion.
A BIG BUT; Warrior with dual wielding is just weird while Rogue is always dual-wielding. If there is a mechanic like that Rogue deserves it more.
Memedeck-seeker. Always tries to build new decks. Hates tournements, streamers, netdecks and poor-o players. ah, but a tournement mode could be great !!!
I dunno, ooze is great and i ran it because of the amount of Mediv i was seeing + taunt warrior (last season). If we see an increase in pirate warrior, then armed with dual wield shenanigans for their end-game, ill be running 2 oozes for shits and gigs.
Not to mention possible freezie sham weapons + lame ass spirit claws and jade dildos.
Maybe there's another part of the hero power, i mean the passive part of using 2 weapons at once and a hero power of shuffling a random weapon in your deck?
I think it's pretty obvious he was playing around, tying to stir some hype up. He likes doing that sort of thing. See: giving hints on what his reveal was going to be.
So, Trump just leaked some information about Warrior's DK Hero power when reviewing the new card Forge of Souls.
As it seems, Warriors will have a passive Hero power that will allow you to have two weapons equiped at the same time.
Here's the source:
https://clips-media-assets.twitch.tv/25945001424-offset-5582-1280x720.mp4#t=0
What do you think about it?
Time for Trump go to Blizzard Jail with Toast...
Maybe Garrosh will have magnataur effect
Vote for my Card Design Submission! I love this one!
Nah, that's not a troll. Look at his reaction, he's like "damn, I shouldn't have said that, I fucked up".
I'm pretty sure this is legit.
Free to try and find a game, dealing cards for sorrow, cards for pain.
With Uther of the Ebon Blade, Rogue finally getting a decent weapon, Pirate/taunt warrior and potential DK warrior, I'm looking forward to getting some use out of my Gluttonous Ooze.
- The place where normally hero power is. If it is passive, the place is no longer required
-Dealing damage will be like zombeast i guess. And they both lose 1 durability for 1 attack. If it won't like that, there is no point to dual wielding. Just a passive hero power as "Your weapons have windfurry" is the same effect.
-it is complicated one but i guess it can be chosen randomly or in order like which weapon is equipped first/last.
But it isn't imposible to put dual wielding in HS in my opinion.
A BIG BUT; Warrior with dual wielding is just weird while Rogue is always dual-wielding. If there is a mechanic like that Rogue deserves it more.
Memedeck-seeker. Always tries to build new decks. Hates tournements, streamers, netdecks and poor-o players.
ah, but a tournement mode could be great !!!
we just got the "Draw two weapons from your deck" card so I don't see how this could be wrong.
Also, trump is reliable...
I exist, I think.
I dunno, ooze is great and i ran it because of the amount of Mediv i was seeing + taunt warrior (last season). If we see an increase in pirate warrior, then armed with dual wield shenanigans for their end-game, ill be running 2 oozes for shits and gigs.
Not to mention possible freezie sham weapons + lame ass spirit claws and jade dildos.
If that's the Warrior DK Hero Power, I'm going to be HUGELY disappointed. Worthless.
That would be the most un fun warrior DK ever...
Maybe there's another part of the hero power, i mean the passive part of using 2 weapons at once and a hero power of shuffling a random weapon in your deck?
If it's a true leak text could be that when you play a second weapon its stats and text are added to your currently equipped weapon.
I think it's pretty obvious he was playing around, tying to stir some hype up. He likes doing that sort of thing. See: giving hints on what his reveal was going to be.
He was just screwing around