Hearthpwn

So I found a fun little thing to do. Once you hit a ranked floor and can't drop, you can pick a popular meta deck, then build a deck specifically to counter that 1 deck, then queue up until you queue into it (and concede otherwise).

I came up with this anti-pirate pirate warrior deck that's close to 100% win vs pirate warrior and EXTREMELY infuriating to play against. Anyone have any other cool counter-deck ideas?

I love you sir!  You are truly doing God's work!

Ooh, I like that idea. I ran about an 85%+ win rate against quest rogues with an aggro hunter deck up to rank 5, but I'll bet I could push it pretty close to 100% if I weren't concerned about any other matchups. That's probably the only deck I hate enough to really thwart. I might give it a shot and rope every single turn.

Ehmm, sure, but why? If you're doing it just because you'll eventually annoy a pirate warrior sure go ahead, but if you're just doing it to eventually guarantee a win and start climbing from there it's better to queue up a meta deck.

did you saw the reddit post some weeks ago where someone met a guy at rank 18000 legend or something who was insta conceding against him? he added him and asked him why and he answered that he is playing a deck to win against pirate warrior only (similar as you) but it is way more funny if you are doing it to prevent rank 1 pw players hitting legend - ultimate gatekeeper :D

Quote from Maukiepaukie >>

Ehmm, sure, but why? If you're doing it just because you'll eventually annoy a pirate warrior sure go ahead, but if you're just doing it to eventually guarantee a win and start climbing from there it's better to queue up a meta deck.

I tried that for fun, and queued into something like 17 straight matches that weren't my target (Pirate Warrior) and then gave up from boredom.

That's incredible

I would like to do that on Quest Rogue. Someone suggest me a great antiroguequestdeck? 

Quote from n3r0s1 >>

I would like to do that on Quest Rogue. Someone suggest me a great antiroguequestdeck? 

Quote from iMPose >>

I tried that for fun, and queued into something like 17 straight matches that weren't my target (Pirate Warrior) and then gave up from boredom.

I made a very defensive control shaman to mainly deal with pirate warriors, Mage decks that just go face with a bunch of stalling and spells, and midrange hunters. It works​ quite well.

You know there are other decks that can beat pirate warrior and are also good against other decks, like many of the pally variants, and you don't even have to run crawler. 

Quote from JosarHearth >>

You know there are other decks that can beat pirate warrior and are also good against other decks, like many of the pally variants, and you don't even have to run crawler. 

I think everyone that thinks this is a good idea, needs to follow some anger-management classes.

Not sure what ya'll trying to achieve, but it certainly isn't going to stop anyone from playing Pirates or Quest Rogue. If you're just in it to completely obliterate the deck you hate playing against a few times, at the cost of losing/conceding to all other decks, then I guess you can, but what's the point? I really don't see it.

It's just a card game guys. Don't let the pirates get under your skin. Take a sad song, and make it better!

there are plenty of people pirate hunting at rank 5 to be honest,  the rest of the meta is basically rogue hunting