Hearthpwn

Recently I've seen alot of complains about this meta (Quest Rogue, Exodia Mage etc...) and was wondering if this meta is worse or better than Gadgetzan's meta, so I wanted to hear your thoughts on the meta so far. (I know it haven't even been a week since the release of Un'Goro, but what do you think of it as of right now?)

Much much much better. Quest rogue is nowhere to aggro shaman.Exodia mage takes 10+ turns to set up, also takes some tought to play. There are a LOTS of viable decks right now, this meta is actually prett good.

Even with Quest Rogue and Quest Mage Un'Goro meta is much healthier because you can come with your own idea and deck and make a decent winrate.

Gadgetzan birthed two of the most cancerous decks to ever exist. Un'goro is infinitely superior..

Long games (12-15 turns), interesting decks..!ELEMENTALS!..ungoro is amazing

Un'Goro meta with no quests.

Aggro meta

/jk

/srs

The meta is still in flux, but right now sure, it's a lot better.

Considering each class has 2 or more viable builds in these early stages, definitely Un'goro.

un'goro meta for sure, gadgetzan meta spawned an anticounterable pirate warrior which un'goro made sure to keep in check, thanks Tar Creeper and tol'vir stoneshapper, plus even if there are decks that are sometimes able to win by turn 6/7 quest rogue is nowhere near the consistent turn 5 wins that pirate warriors had in the past and still has against some decks

Quote from Macinstosh >>

Gadgetzan birthed two of the most cancerous decks to ever exist. Un'goro is infinitely superior..

How is this even a question? Go back to ALL posts in January and February and that will give you an idea

You're stalely asking me "would I want a meta that's infested with pointlessly crazy quests or would I want a meta that literally chased me away from the game."

Just lower the usage of the goddamn quests, not every deck needs them.

And no, I do NOT want to see Pirate Warrior and Aggro Shaman's dirty faces again. NEVER. I used to fucking LIKE this game.