Hearthpwn

Quote from scorpyon >>

Quote from CheeseEatingSurrenderMonkey >>

Quote from Mot1ons >>

I'm glad hunter got shafted. Finally no more hunter face decks.

Can you imagine? Pirate warrior, face hunter, face shaman, anyfin pala. 

This game suffers a big disease called aggro and it needs to be toned down.
Time for warrior to get the shaft next expansion.

What's the point of all these expensive legendaries when people only play with cheap cards anyway?

You know that current face decks are at least as effective as FH was back in the days right ? And that it is precisely warrior - the supposed "control" class - that is leading the charge ?

Back on topic though, I agree that Hunter's current status is linked to the current meta rather than the class itself (this isn't true for Paladin). It gets out-SMOrced by pirate decks and out-valued by Reno decks. Give Hunter a 1 AND 2 mana weapon and it will join Shaman and Warrior in the SMOrc fiesta.

I totally agree with you - apart from the idea that Warrior is supposed to just be a "Control" class. I'm certain it was never intended to be only this. There were plenty of options for Aggro Warriors even early on - but they were just pants! Heh!