I know the posibilities that a new class goes into next expansion are slim at least. But as an intelectual exercise i ask you those two questions.
the first one referes to your preferences. To see wich is the class more popular in this forum.
The second is that the wich class has more numbers to be the first ( you can also include the order in post) For a lot of people may be DK as it was the first one in WOW, ( but team 5 may want to reserve that class to not be the novate or to implement in a crisis of sales time) also if finally comes a Pandaria themed ampliation it could be monk. As to coincide with "legion release could aso be DH.
Boy a new class chance is not slim is not existent, why you want to hurt yourself. Blizzard is still figuring out how to balance the game, they don't have any time to introduce a new class that will inevitably bring caos with all other existent class and neutral cards.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Follow on Twitter for news, meta analysis and funny Hearthstone related stuff!
Blizzard already doesn't really care about balancing the game, it just about removing skill-based decks. So Demon Hunter. Good for WoW:Legion promotion.
It is really funny how people are not comparing Hearthstone and WoW at all...was classic WoW balanced when it launched? Like when classic WoW launched, the balance was so inappropriate that there was a huge shitstorm going around. Fury warrior was just messing around with all other classes and rogue just pushed the dps ranking to another galaxy! Still Blizz released more and more classes with each expansion. You see what I am trying to say? You won't really ever be able to balance every class to the same level. There will always be a better class and a worse class. This is why implementing a new class will be possible, but I guess not now and not with the spring expansion but with the spring expansion in 2018, we might actually see it. 3 years is the perfect time to be able to see how things work and to make classes kinda balanced
Death Knights would have a lot of deathrattle and undead synergy, Demon Hunters would be like a Rogue-Warlock hybrid, with fel and weapons, and Monks would be like Paladins, but a bit less of the "Change attack/health" aspect, and a lot more buff cards (don't forget the brews).
If they must release a new class, I would want to see Monk. However, as others have said, the game is still in need of balancing and polishing, so releasing a new class could potentially just kill the game altogether.
What I prefer to see instead is the addition of Specializations. One specialization, for example, might be called "Tank" and start your hero with 40 or 50 HP. The idea would be to further enhance your deck's potential based on its design strategy. (There's nothing worse than getting faced down on turn 6 by an Aggro Mage with a perfect draw for 30 face damage from hand, thinking, "If only I had 10 more HP".)
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"Nerf Paper," said Rock.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
First of all excuse my english as im not native.
I know the posibilities that a new class goes into next expansion are slim at least. But as an intelectual exercise i ask you those two questions.
the first one referes to your preferences. To see wich is the class more popular in this forum.
The second is that the wich class has more numbers to be the first ( you can also include the order in post) For a lot of people may be DK as it was the first one in WOW, ( but team 5 may want to reserve that class to not be the novate or to implement in a crisis of sales time) also if finally comes a Pandaria themed ampliation it could be monk. As to coincide with "legion release could aso be DH.
Feel free to post your impresions and thx.
Boy a new class chance is not slim is not existent, why you want to hurt yourself. Blizzard is still figuring out how to balance the game, they don't have any time to introduce a new class that will inevitably bring caos with all other existent class and neutral cards.
Follow on Twitter for news, meta analysis and funny Hearthstone related stuff!
Blizzard already doesn't really care about balancing the game, it just about removing skill-based decks. So Demon Hunter. Good for WoW:Legion promotion.
Hall of Fame (ignore list): aleathas, Baylith, cendol, DiamondDM13, Dominieq, doomr, glitterprincess, hamtarofr, Heck, Jwigg33, Kaladin, Krewger, Legend_Entomber, libertyprime, Maukiepaukie, PandarenHero, randjob, s2mikey, SchruteBucks, The_Giratina, TheWamts, ticandtac, tictactucroc, tsudecimo, WaffleMonstr
It is really funny how people are not comparing Hearthstone and WoW at all...was classic WoW balanced when it launched? Like when classic WoW launched, the balance was so inappropriate that there was a huge shitstorm going around. Fury warrior was just messing around with all other classes and rogue just pushed the dps ranking to another galaxy! Still Blizz released more and more classes with each expansion. You see what I am trying to say? You won't really ever be able to balance every class to the same level. There will always be a better class and a worse class. This is why implementing a new class will be possible, but I guess not now and not with the spring expansion but with the spring expansion in 2018, we might actually see it. 3 years is the perfect time to be able to see how things work and to make classes kinda balanced
Just remember the good times!
They should release two new classes all with classic cards, plus new ones from the expansion, why not? It would bring a lot. More to the table,
Let me change your mind...
Death Knights would have a lot of deathrattle and undead synergy, Demon Hunters would be like a Rogue-Warlock hybrid, with fel and weapons, and Monks would be like Paladins, but a bit less of the "Change attack/health" aspect, and a lot more buff cards (don't forget the brews).
Cheap decks are my specialty.
(Deck in making)
If they must release a new class, I would want to see Monk. However, as others have said, the game is still in need of balancing and polishing, so releasing a new class could potentially just kill the game altogether.
What I prefer to see instead is the addition of Specializations. One specialization, for example, might be called "Tank" and start your hero with 40 or 50 HP. The idea would be to further enhance your deck's potential based on its design strategy. (There's nothing worse than getting faced down on turn 6 by an Aggro Mage with a perfect draw for 30 face damage from hand, thinking, "If only I had 10 more HP".)
"Nerf Paper," said Rock.