I've played since closed beta and I've played aggro, control, tempo and midrange and I've won and lost against all archetypes. So I'm wondering what is strong against what?
It's very simple. Scissors cuts paper, paper covers rock, rock crushes lizard, lizard poisons Spock, Spock smashes scissors, scissors decapitates lizard, lizard eats paper, paper disproves Spock, Spock vaporizes rock, and, as it always has, rock crushes scissors.
aggro decks always have advantage since their mana curve is low and they have to worry about less drawing bad also no match up is unwinabble its all about opponent drawing good or bad. control decks lack of early cards and key cards at the right time. thats why aggro was always dominant in hs
aggro decks always have advantage since their mana curve is low and they have to worry about less drawing bad also no match up is unwinabble its all about opponent drawing good or bad. control decks lack of early cards and key cards at the right time. thats why aggro was always dominant in hs
No, the reasons are ladder and reward systems. Control Warrior has pretty much always crushed most of the aggro decks but an aggro deck with 55% wr can climb as fast as a fatique deck with 75% wr (not counting win streaks which favor good wr over speed).
Just play mid-range shaman and you don't have to worry about it.
Generally in HS fast decks are vastly superior to slow decks, unless you're competing for upper legend ranks or tournaments (the faster decks might still be better, but at that point WR and countering the meta is everything).
This isn't just because of the speed of the matches (though that matters the most), but because low-mana cards are (as a rule of thumb) highly undercosted compared to high-mana cards.
I've played since closed beta and I've played aggro, control, tempo and midrange and I've won and lost against all archetypes. So I'm wondering what is strong against what?
Aggro vs tempo
Control vs Midrange
Woeden#1173 - NA
It is obviously not that simple, and you should already know it, since you are playing since closed beta.
It's very simple. Scissors cuts paper, paper covers rock, rock crushes lizard, lizard poisons Spock, Spock smashes scissors, scissors decapitates lizard, lizard eats paper, paper disproves Spock, Spock vaporizes rock, and, as it always has, rock crushes scissors.
This is going nowhere...
Woeden#1173 - NA
I as well have been playing since the closed beta and there is no way to classify it like that. You want like a full rundown?
Omicron016#1732
aggro decks always have advantage since their mana curve is low and they have to worry about less drawing bad also no match up is unwinabble its all about opponent drawing good or bad. control decks lack of early cards and key cards at the right time. thats why aggro was always dominant in hs
Braindead deck>high skill cap deck
Very braindead deck>braindead deck
Insanly braindead deck>very braindead deck. Hearthstone in nutshell since post naxx(after the pleasant break of patron era)
It doesn't matter whether is midface,face,or burn''tempo''.The stupiest the deck is the better!
Just play mid-range shaman and you don't have to worry about it.
Generally in HS fast decks are vastly superior to slow decks, unless you're competing for upper legend ranks or tournaments (the faster decks might still be better, but at that point WR and countering the meta is everything).
This isn't just because of the speed of the matches (though that matters the most), but because low-mana cards are (as a rule of thumb) highly undercosted compared to high-mana cards.
There once was a man from Nantucket...
Woeden#1173 - NA
Hamburgers
There once was a man from Nantucket...