Hearthpwn

Quote from negailestingaz >>

I played over 60 games in rank 5 patiently over the weekend

 

Win rate only 45%- why you ask? because of 60 games 28 hunters. Yes half of it.

Until COW is out of rotation this game is ruined. its pointless.

In my run to rank 20 ~10 I only faced shamans. One time 7 in a row

You're LUCKY

Quote from iandakar >>

Quote from Remster101 >>

Quote from RabiezMiddleFinger >>

Just came came after taking a break. I skipped the entire Wrath expansion because I hated it.

Now I came back and started playing. Started ranking up. Got to rank 10 and then I faced nothing but hunter. 5 in a row to be exact.

Turned the game off.

Is it back to this again? Is it hunter meta deluxe all over again like Naxx was I just really unlucky?

  Rank 10 isn't the meta.

 It is for rank 10.  There's multiple metas.  Tempostorm only reports the high end version.  For the majority of players, it's not too relevant as they are in the lower ranks.  For most folks, the rank 15-5 meta is the meta they really care about.

Though the point of the replies is to let the OP know that his 5 hunter experience isn't THAT typical.  Hunter is popular but not as nasty as they were when he first played and shamans are much more common.  

Quote from loshmi123 >>

Quote from Remster101 >>

Quote from RabiezMiddleFinger >>

Just came came after taking a break. I skipped the entire Wrath expansion because I hated it.

Now I came back and started playing. Started ranking up. Got to rank 10 and then I faced nothing but hunter. 5 in a row to be exact.

Turned the game off.

Is it back to this again? Is it hunter meta deluxe all over again like Naxx was I just really unlucky?

  Rank 10 isn't the meta.

 

what you wanna say? that hunters arent all over the place in legend ranks?

Quote from Remster101 >>

Quote from iandakar >>

Quote from Remster101 >>

Quote from RabiezMiddleFinger >>

Just came came after taking a break. I skipped the entire Wrath expansion because I hated it.

Now I came back and started playing. Started ranking up. Got to rank 10 and then I faced nothing but hunter. 5 in a row to be exact.

Turned the game off.

Is it back to this again? Is it hunter meta deluxe all over again like Naxx was I just really unlucky?

  Rank 10 isn't the meta.

 It is for rank 10.  There's multiple metas.  Tempostorm only reports the high end version.  For the majority of players, it's not too relevant as they are in the lower ranks.  For most folks, the rank 15-5 meta is the meta they really care about.

Though the point of the replies is to let the OP know that his 5 hunter experience isn't THAT typical.  Hunter is popular but not as nasty as they were when he first played and shamans are much more common.  

 Ok I'll bite.

If the meta is different at rank 10 then why are you talking about the shaman meta which is most prevalent at under rank 5 and legend? That doesn't seem to be relevant to the rank 10 meta in which he played against 5 hunters.

Because I was referring to the rank 15-5 meta when I said that, not the 5-legend rank.

Unless someone has some data that says that the rank 10ish zone has gone full hunter recently.  

Quote from iandakar >>

Quote from negailestingaz >>

I played over 60 games in rank 5 patiently over the weekend

 

Win rate only 45%- why you ask? because of 60 games 28 hunters. Yes half of it.

Until COW is out of rotation this game is ruined. its pointless.

What deck are you playing?

Quote from nevr3000 >>

Quote from negailestingaz >>

 It is not really a point what deck i am playing, the problem is the ratio of hunters.

Basically i have decks that runs 70%+ rate and should easily climb to legend (my own versions of CW, Control paladin, healing shaman etc - basically control decks). 

There is a twist to it - That 70% is if i exclude hunter matchup. I get that my decks are very bad against hunters and i dont mind that. Its that rock , paper, scissors thingy which i am again fine with it.

But the fact that 50% of the matches are Hunters simply negates any attempt to rank with control deck. 

So not even COW is a problem, problem is amount of hunters. If i am as player forced to play a deck that directly counters ONE deck and ONE only - than i would not call it a healthy meta imho. 

 If you aren't adjusting to the majority of the meta, you are rewarding them for playing hunter.

I face so much drood maly, yogg, etc ... at rank 4 some mid sham (not so much face right now) hunt, demo (discolock is actually a thing) the truth is the meta is pretty fast but their is a real diversity of class. Priest, pal and rogue appart xD. It's obvious that it cant be possible to have 15 tier 1 deck it's a fact. Actually their is like 5 or 6 good tier 2 decks that can make it to upper ranks without problems. Perhaps not legend but actually very few people hit legend (or care about it). I hit legend once with face sham and now i don't care, i play what i want and i keep myself around rank 4 and that is find, you have good reward you play fun decks. Just chill people, it's a game.

If you're not playing Hunter, you're not trying.

Quote from negailestingaz >>

Quote from iandakar >>

Quote from negailestingaz >>

I played over 60 games in rank 5 patiently over the weekend

 

Win rate only 45%- why you ask? because of 60 games 28 hunters. Yes half of it.

Until COW is out of rotation this game is ruined. its pointless.

What deck are you playing?

 It is not really a point what deck i am playing, the problem is the ratio of hunters.

Basically i have decks that runs 70%+ rate and should easily climb to legend (my own versions of CW, Control paladin, healing shaman etc - basically control decks). 

There is a twist to it - That 70% is if i exclude hunter matchup. I get that my decks are very bad against hunters and i dont mind that. Its that rock , paper, scissors thingy which i am again fine with it.

But the fact that 50% of the matches are Hunters simply negates any attempt to rank with control deck. 

So not even COW is a problem, problem is amount of hunters. If i am as player forced to play a deck that directly counters ONE deck and ONE only - than i would not call it a healthy meta imho. 

I took a big break from visiting HS related sites, where half of the people whine about cards that ruin the game. The game itself felt better all of a sudden.