Is this just me or do i feel this site is just people posting their good decks we all have seen thousands of times. i don't want boring tier 1 netdecks like fel DH, i want people actually making interesting decks. i do see interesting decks (right now there is actually a good chunk of fun decks.) i often make an interesting new deck i bet you haven't seen before that is actually a fine deck gets 0 upvotes but a boring deck we see all the time gets like 5. not insane but it's still kinda sad. There is still many fun decks but atleast just as many boring ones, like moonbeam otk was fun when it started, now there is like 10+ of them on this site.
I didn't realise moonbeam druid was a thing, I built one for the challenge and it performed very well and one of the more fun otk decks I've played for a while bc it's not just sitting and wiping boards the whole game but yeah I agree, creativity with the decks is why I play Hearthstone and sometimes I lose to a deck and think "damn that looks good/fun" and attempt to make a version myself but that's as far as I go with netdecking. I do wish there was some game mode that would allow for more freedom and fun but that is probably impossible to design and build and actually have it work as intended
I was playing duels the other day and my opponent had a deck full of face damage spells.
He beat me, but my God, that seemed like the most boring deck conceivable. Like face Hunter, but even more boring. I honestly couldn't believe someone thought that was be a good time, for either person.
Let’s, for the sake of the topic title, say there aren’t enough interesting decks on HSReplay. Where do play your sub optimal (interesting) deck? Standard (ladder) which is full of optimal (meta) decks…
PS
I made some interesting decks (in my opinion), but they never make it to the front page. Also i wouldn’t play them in Standard (ladder). I don’t play for rank, but even bronze is full of (optimal) meta decks which are usually (a lot) better.
I build my own decks quite frequently or use meta decks and shift them to fit my style.
If I'd post one of these ppl would call them meta decks. My goal is to get my own idea to legend material, therefor even if it was unique in the first place, the finetuning will make it more and more meta-oriented.
Great example is my Ambassador warrior Version. It's just as good (similar) as the regular Control decks just different in the win con. This Deck was unique in it's concept since I ran a truckload of dredge cards but I had to cut most of them to be competetive.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Is this just me or do i feel this site is just people posting their good decks we all have seen thousands of times. i don't want boring tier 1 netdecks like fel DH, i want people actually making interesting decks. i do see interesting decks (right now there is actually a good chunk of fun decks.) i often make an interesting new deck i bet you haven't seen before that is actually a fine deck gets 0 upvotes but a boring deck we see all the time gets like 5. not insane but it's still kinda sad. There is still many fun decks but atleast just as many boring ones, like moonbeam otk was fun when it started, now there is like 10+ of them on this site.
I didn't realise moonbeam druid was a thing, I built one for the challenge and it performed very well and one of the more fun otk decks I've played for a while bc it's not just sitting and wiping boards the whole game but yeah I agree, creativity with the decks is why I play Hearthstone and sometimes I lose to a deck and think "damn that looks good/fun" and attempt to make a version myself but that's as far as I go with netdecking. I do wish there was some game mode that would allow for more freedom and fun but that is probably impossible to design and build and actually have it work as intended
Almost every deck on the front page is new to me, not something I've ever seen in-game. So I guess my answer is no.
I was playing duels the other day and my opponent had a deck full of face damage spells.
He beat me, but my God, that seemed like the most boring deck conceivable. Like face Hunter, but even more boring. I honestly couldn't believe someone thought that was be a good time, for either person.
Let’s, for the sake of the topic title, say there aren’t enough interesting decks on HSReplay. Where do play your sub optimal (interesting) deck? Standard (ladder) which is full of optimal (meta) decks…
PS
I made some interesting decks (in my opinion), but they never make it to the front page. Also i wouldn’t play them in Standard (ladder). I don’t play for rank, but even bronze is full of (optimal) meta decks which are usually (a lot) better.
Well a pure fun Deck isnt fun since it wont work.
I build my own decks quite frequently or use meta decks and shift them to fit my style.
If I'd post one of these ppl would call them meta decks. My goal is to get my own idea to legend material, therefor even if it was unique in the first place, the finetuning will make it more and more meta-oriented.
Great example is my Ambassador warrior Version. It's just as good (similar) as the regular Control decks just different in the win con. This Deck was unique in it's concept since I ran a truckload of dredge cards but I had to cut most of them to be competetive.