⚙
Learn More
Cosmetics
Related Cards
Card Pools
✕
×
PopCard Settings
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Elements settings
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
Ok everyone, I built a Control Paladin and am crushing everyone at the moment from ranks 8 to 5. I went on a 9-1 win streak so far. Before the Nerfs, I was at about 63% at 17-10 with a slightly different version. Give it a go if you like Paladin and Control decks. I put in Azalina Sunsorrow for the memes, but only played her 1 time in the 10 games so far, so feel free to replace her with any tech choice you want.
one day, my deck creations will be shared by all!! oh dare to dream!!!
LuL
I don't wanna be that guy but the nerfs were yesterday and people are still testing out all sorts of decks, so the winrates can be pretty skewed if you know what you're doing, kinda like when Toast got to legend with some 90% winrate Shudderwock deck when the expansion was brand new, and we all know how most Shudderwock decks ended up turning out.
I'm a big Control Paladin fan, and I've used similar decks like this before. Problem with this kind of build is that you will always lose to other Control decks (Taunt Druid, Shudderwock Shaman, etc) who have a more solid win condition. The only way Control Paladin is even viable atm is using the OTK combo deck. Here is the one I used a while back, but haven't tested it post-nerf:
EDIT: Zola makes it more of an OTK ;)
https://outof.cards
Grats. Thought Uther of the Ebon Blade was unplayable when I was looking at HSreplay, but it's good that you are proving the data wrong.
Not sure if hyped yet.
OmegaLul
I just want to let you know that 17-10 is not enough games to show the true performance quality of a deck. Even if it was 25-2 it still wouldn't change my mind. There is an element to playing more than 100 games with a deck where you realize 1 of the 3 things.
1. Is it because the deck is good
2. Is it because the player is insanely lucky with a bad deck
3. is the deck pilot actually carrying a bad deck.
usually 100+ games with multiple people playing the deck can figure this out. Chances are you're sitting on 2 right now. There is a possibility that you're a god at hearthstone and 3 is the truth. But I strongly doubt 1 is the case because 1 is like secret pally before year of the kraken where literally a bad player can win with the deck with bad luck.
Not throwing shade or anything, it's cool that your deck works, all I'm saying is that the meta is far from settling down just yet. If you're still winning a lot with it in a week or two then it's definitely working and it's a good deck after the nerfs. What I was trying to say is that whenever there's a big change in the game, people start experimenting with a lot of decks and not everyone is a good deck builder, so it's very easy to go on winstreaks with new decks, and that's why I used the extreme example of Toast's Shudderwock deck. 90% winrate is definitely meta breaking until it settles down and it ends up having just 40% winrate or so.
Just keep playing it, testing it out and having fun, but having success early on is hardly a proof for the test of time.
LOL
Dead but dreaming
It is, but I think control paladin is weaker when lightlord rotated out from standard. I think control paladin is viable in wild with N'Zoth package.