I have everything for taunt druid but hadronox and oakheart. The deck looks fun/good and I really want to play it, but I don't have enough dust to craft both. Would it be worth crafting hadronox and taking oakheart out for something else? Plz help
I'm pretty sure there's lists on here (or maybe /r/hearthstone) without Oakheart, I know the first version I ran didn't have him but I can't find the list right now.
Having played the deck I'll tell you that the deck is powerful but it can really beat itself. You get really bad topdecks when you put two naturalize and two witching moon in your deck. You're very reliant on finding Hadronax, and Oakheart basically gives you two copies, adding consistency. So the deck is playable without Oakheart, and that version plays more bad topdecks like the 9 mana 2/4 dragon recruiter guy, but overall the deck is better with him in it. Good luck.
I've ran both versions with and without Oakheart. While the Oakheart version is more consistent, the deck is still viable and enjoyable to play without him. Go for it. It's a game and you play it to have fun, so have fun.
I have Oakheart and removed him as he would always show up at the wrong time, or be wouldn't even pull Hadronox, as Ironbark Golem is 3 attack as well. He kind of adds consistency but not much, and he's a dead draw 9 mana do nothing if you have Hadronox in hand already. I replaced him with more draw, and silence+weapon removal tech cards to better stomp cubelock.
I have everything for taunt druid but hadronox and oakheart. The deck looks fun/good and I really want to play it, but I don't have enough dust to craft both. Would it be worth crafting hadronox and taking oakheart out for something else? Plz help
yes
What
I'm pretty sure there's lists on here (or maybe /r/hearthstone) without Oakheart, I know the first version I ran didn't have him but I can't find the list right now.
Having played the deck I'll tell you that the deck is powerful but it can really beat itself. You get really bad topdecks when you put two naturalize and two witching moon in your deck. You're very reliant on finding Hadronax, and Oakheart basically gives you two copies, adding consistency. So the deck is playable without Oakheart, and that version plays more bad topdecks like the 9 mana 2/4 dragon recruiter guy, but overall the deck is better with him in it. Good luck.
Here's a non Oakheart list:
http://www.hearthstonetopdecks.com/decks/cube-taunt-druid-deck-list-guide/
Oakheart wasn't even part of the original lists nor is he needed. I've taken the deck to rank 5 without Oakheart or the Lich King.
Oakheart helps with pulling Hadronox when he'S hiding at the bottom of your deck, but if on average.
Aat this point you also should consider that Hadronox Druid is much harder to make work now that people start teching against it.
I tried having fun once. It was awful.
I like oakheart and dragonhatcher but it's not required for the deck to win. You could just add in some more cycle or ramp in his place.
Naturalize is all you need, not Oakheart :)
- Click Here To Join Us On Discord! -
I've ran both versions with and without Oakheart. While the Oakheart version is more consistent, the deck is still viable and enjoyable to play without him. Go for it. It's a game and you play it to have fun, so have fun.
I have Oakheart and removed him as he would always show up at the wrong time, or be wouldn't even pull Hadronox, as Ironbark Golem is 3 attack as well. He kind of adds consistency but not much, and he's a dead draw 9 mana do nothing if you have Hadronox in hand already. I replaced him with more draw, and silence+weapon removal tech cards to better stomp cubelock.
As others have pointed out, Oakheart is only played in about one-third of the Hadronox lists.
Here's a link to a bunch of decks -
https://hsreplay.net/archetypes/149/taunt-druid
Hit the "Popular Decks" tab and pick your poison.